工艺参数对透明材料固体颗粒抗侵蚀性的影响

Q3 Engineering

Tribology in Industry Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.24874/ti.1495.06.23.08

Doğan Acar, Mohammad Hussain Danesh, Ömer Necati Cora

{"title":"工艺参数对透明材料固体颗粒抗侵蚀性的影响","authors":"Doğan Acar, Mohammad Hussain Danesh, Ömer Necati Cora","doi":"10.24874/ti.1495.06.23.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The solid particle erosion (SPE) performance of three different transparent materials, polycarbonate solid sheet, plexiglass (Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and laminated glass was investigated. Erosion tests were performed under different impact angles (20°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°) and impinging velocities (75, 150, and 200 m/s). As erodent particles, alumina (Al2O3) with 52 µm average diameter and silicon carbide (SiC), particles with two different dimensions (71, and 348 µm in diameters) were used. The results showed that polycarbonate specimens outperformed the other tested samples regardless of impact velocity and impinging angle conditions. When the erosion resistance of samples at 90° and 75 m/s is taken into consideration, the polycarbonate sheet was found to be at least 14 times more erosion resistant compared to plexiglass, and 23 times more resistant than the laminated glass materials. In addition, polycarbonate exhibited an incubation behavior at lower impact velocity, and with SiC erodent.","PeriodicalId":23320,"journal":{"name":"Tribology in Industry","volume":"7 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Process Parameters on the Solid Particle Erosion Resistance of Transparent Materials\",\"authors\":\"Doğan Acar, Mohammad Hussain Danesh, Ömer Necati Cora\",\"doi\":\"10.24874/ti.1495.06.23.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The solid particle erosion (SPE) performance of three different transparent materials, polycarbonate solid sheet, plexiglass (Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and laminated glass was investigated. Erosion tests were performed under different impact angles (20°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°) and impinging velocities (75, 150, and 200 m/s). As erodent particles, alumina (Al2O3) with 52 µm average diameter and silicon carbide (SiC), particles with two different dimensions (71, and 348 µm in diameters) were used. The results showed that polycarbonate specimens outperformed the other tested samples regardless of impact velocity and impinging angle conditions. When the erosion resistance of samples at 90° and 75 m/s is taken into consideration, the polycarbonate sheet was found to be at least 14 times more erosion resistant compared to plexiglass, and 23 times more resistant than the laminated glass materials. In addition, polycarbonate exhibited an incubation behavior at lower impact velocity, and with SiC erodent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tribology in Industry\",\"volume\":\"7 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tribology in Industry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24874/ti.1495.06.23.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribology in Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24874/ti.1495.06.23.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了聚碳酸酯实心板、有机玻璃（聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯（PMMA））和夹层玻璃这三种不同透明材料的固体颗粒侵蚀（SPE）性能。在不同的冲击角度（20°、30°、45°、60°和 90°）和冲击速度（75、150 和 200 米/秒）下进行了侵蚀试验。使用了平均直径为 52 微米的氧化铝（Al2O3）和碳化硅（SiC）颗粒作为侵蚀剂，这两种颗粒的直径不同（分别为 71 微米和 348 微米）。结果表明，无论冲击速度和冲击角度如何，聚碳酸酯试样的性能都优于其他测试样品。如果考虑到样品在 90° 和 75 m/s 下的抗侵蚀性，聚碳酸酯板材的抗侵蚀性至少是有机玻璃的 14 倍，是夹层玻璃材料的 23 倍。此外，聚碳酸酯在较低的冲击速度和使用碳化硅侵蚀剂的情况下也表现出了抗侵蚀性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Effect of Process Parameters on the Solid Particle Erosion Resistance of Transparent Materials

The solid particle erosion (SPE) performance of three different transparent materials, polycarbonate solid sheet, plexiglass (Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and laminated glass was investigated. Erosion tests were performed under different impact angles (20°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°) and impinging velocities (75, 150, and 200 m/s). As erodent particles, alumina (Al2O3) with 52 µm average diameter and silicon carbide (SiC), particles with two different dimensions (71, and 348 µm in diameters) were used. The results showed that polycarbonate specimens outperformed the other tested samples regardless of impact velocity and impinging angle conditions. When the erosion resistance of samples at 90° and 75 m/s is taken into consideration, the polycarbonate sheet was found to be at least 14 times more erosion resistant compared to plexiglass, and 23 times more resistant than the laminated glass materials. In addition, polycarbonate exhibited an incubation behavior at lower impact velocity, and with SiC erodent.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Tribology in Industry Engineering-Mechanical Engineering

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks

期刊介绍： he aim of Tribology in Industry journal is to publish quality experimental and theoretical research papers in fields of the science of friction, wear and lubrication and any closely related fields. The scope includes all aspects of materials science, surface science, applied physics and mechanical engineering which relate directly to the subjects of wear and friction. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: Friction, Wear, Lubricants, Surface characterization, Surface engineering, Nanotribology, Contact mechanics, Coatings, Alloys, Composites, Tribological design, Biotribology, Green Tribology.