完成猿猴的分子时间树

IF 2.8 Q2 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Jack M Craig, Grace L. Bamba, Jose Barba-Montoya, S. Hedges, Sudhir Kumar, Sankar Subramanian, Yuanning Li, Gagandeep Singh
{"title":"完成猿猴的分子时间树","authors":"Jack M Craig, Grace L. Bamba, Jose Barba-Montoya, S. Hedges, Sudhir Kumar, Sankar Subramanian, Yuanning Li, Gagandeep Singh","doi":"10.3389/fbinf.2023.1284744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primate infraorder Simiiformes, comprising Old and New World monkeys and apes, includes the most well-studied species on earth. Their most comprehensive molecular timetree, assembled from thousands of published studies, is found in the TimeTree database and contains 268 simiiform species. It is, however, missing 38 out of 306 named species in the NCBI taxonomy for which at least one molecular sequence exists in the NCBI GenBank. We developed a three-pronged approach to expanding the timetree of Simiiformes to contain 306 species. First, molecular divergence times were searched and found for 21 missing species in timetrees published across 15 studies. Second, untimed molecular phylogenies were searched and scaled to time using relaxed clocks to add four more species. Third, we reconstructed ten new timetrees from genetic data in GenBank, allowing us to incorporate 13 more species. Finally, we assembled the most comprehensive molecular timetree of Simiiformes containing all 306 species for which any molecular data exists. We compared the species divergence times with those previously imputed using statistical approaches in the absence of molecular data. The latter data-less imputed times were not significantly correlated with those derived from the molecular data. Also, using phylogenies containing imputed times produced different trends of evolutionary distinctiveness and speciation rates over time than those produced using the molecular timetree. These results demonstrate that more complete clade-specific timetrees can be produced by analyzing existing information, which we hope will encourage future efforts to fill in the missing taxa in the global timetree of life.","PeriodicalId":73066,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in bioinformatics","volume":"122 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Completing a molecular timetree of apes and monkeys\",\"authors\":\"Jack M Craig, Grace L. Bamba, Jose Barba-Montoya, S. Hedges, Sudhir Kumar, Sankar Subramanian, Yuanning Li, Gagandeep Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fbinf.2023.1284744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The primate infraorder Simiiformes, comprising Old and New World monkeys and apes, includes the most well-studied species on earth. Their most comprehensive molecular timetree, assembled from thousands of published studies, is found in the TimeTree database and contains 268 simiiform species. It is, however, missing 38 out of 306 named species in the NCBI taxonomy for which at least one molecular sequence exists in the NCBI GenBank. We developed a three-pronged approach to expanding the timetree of Simiiformes to contain 306 species. First, molecular divergence times were searched and found for 21 missing species in timetrees published across 15 studies. Second, untimed molecular phylogenies were searched and scaled to time using relaxed clocks to add four more species. Third, we reconstructed ten new timetrees from genetic data in GenBank, allowing us to incorporate 13 more species. Finally, we assembled the most comprehensive molecular timetree of Simiiformes containing all 306 species for which any molecular data exists. We compared the species divergence times with those previously imputed using statistical approaches in the absence of molecular data. The latter data-less imputed times were not significantly correlated with those derived from the molecular data. Also, using phylogenies containing imputed times produced different trends of evolutionary distinctiveness and speciation rates over time than those produced using the molecular timetree. These results demonstrate that more complete clade-specific timetrees can be produced by analyzing existing information, which we hope will encourage future efforts to fill in the missing taxa in the global timetree of life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\"122 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2023.1284744\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2023.1284744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

灵长目猿亚目包括新旧世界的猴类和猿类,是地球上研究最深入的物种。时间树数据库(TimeTree)中包含了 268 个猿形目物种,这是最全面的分子时间树,由数千项已发表的研究成果组合而成。然而,在美国国家生物信息局(NCBI)分类学中的 306 个命名物种中,有 38 个物种的分子序列至少存在于 NCBI GenBank 中,而这 38 个物种的分子序列却缺失了。我们开发了一种三管齐下的方法来扩展蚋形目时间树,使其包含 306 个物种。首先,我们搜索了 15 项研究发表的时间树中 21 个缺失物种的分子分歧时间。其次,利用松弛时钟搜索未定时的分子系统发生并按时间缩放,从而增加了 4 个物种。第三,我们根据 GenBank 中的基因数据重建了 10 个新的时间树,从而又增加了 13 个物种。最后,我们建立了最全面的蚋形目分子时间树,其中包含了有分子数据的所有 306 个物种。我们将物种分歧时间与之前在没有分子数据的情况下使用统计方法推算出的物种分歧时间进行了比较。后者的无数据推算时间与分子数据推算时间的相关性不大。此外,使用含有推算时间的系统进化论与使用分子时间树得出的进化独特性和物种分化率随时间变化的趋势不同。这些结果表明,通过分析现有信息可以生成更完整的特定支系时间树,我们希望这将鼓励未来填补全球生命时间树中缺失类群的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Completing a molecular timetree of apes and monkeys
The primate infraorder Simiiformes, comprising Old and New World monkeys and apes, includes the most well-studied species on earth. Their most comprehensive molecular timetree, assembled from thousands of published studies, is found in the TimeTree database and contains 268 simiiform species. It is, however, missing 38 out of 306 named species in the NCBI taxonomy for which at least one molecular sequence exists in the NCBI GenBank. We developed a three-pronged approach to expanding the timetree of Simiiformes to contain 306 species. First, molecular divergence times were searched and found for 21 missing species in timetrees published across 15 studies. Second, untimed molecular phylogenies were searched and scaled to time using relaxed clocks to add four more species. Third, we reconstructed ten new timetrees from genetic data in GenBank, allowing us to incorporate 13 more species. Finally, we assembled the most comprehensive molecular timetree of Simiiformes containing all 306 species for which any molecular data exists. We compared the species divergence times with those previously imputed using statistical approaches in the absence of molecular data. The latter data-less imputed times were not significantly correlated with those derived from the molecular data. Also, using phylogenies containing imputed times produced different trends of evolutionary distinctiveness and speciation rates over time than those produced using the molecular timetree. These results demonstrate that more complete clade-specific timetrees can be produced by analyzing existing information, which we hope will encourage future efforts to fill in the missing taxa in the global timetree of life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信