{"title":"澳大利亚卫生服务管理课程:关于教学大纲的讨论","authors":"Margaret Yen, Judith Anderson","doi":"10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.1985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this research was to understand core knowledge areas offered by Masters courses in health services management in Australian universities.\nDesign: A Google search identified relevant Masters’ degrees in health services management. Course syllabus was then extracted from each university’s website. Common core subjects were then collated and compared.\nSetting: Data for this study was collected from Australian university websites.Main outcome measures: Findings were compared with those presented in a similar study conducted in 2013. Interpretation was also informed by an appraisal of key issues that characterise the current context of health care in Australia.\nResults: Masters’ degrees in health services management were offered by 18 universities. Common core subjects included management, evaluation, evidence, health system, governance, law and human resource management. A comparison with an earlier study conducted by Ritchie and Yen [1] found an increase in the following subjects: health system, quality management, health economics, policy and research, and a decrease in health information, epidemiology and resourcing. New knowledge areas included leadership, planning and project management, change management, and strategy.\nConclusions: This paper presents a discussion on knowledge areas that comprise syllabus in masters level health services management education nationally. Key findings revealed differences between courses and the responsiveness of core syllabus to the current health care environment. The emergence of leadership, planning and project management was unsurprising while an absence of subjects that gave explicit reference to First Nations peoples was a notable finding.","PeriodicalId":42935,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","volume":"86 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australian Health Services Management Courses: A discussion on syllabus\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Yen, Judith Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.1985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this research was to understand core knowledge areas offered by Masters courses in health services management in Australian universities.\\nDesign: A Google search identified relevant Masters’ degrees in health services management. Course syllabus was then extracted from each university’s website. Common core subjects were then collated and compared.\\nSetting: Data for this study was collected from Australian university websites.Main outcome measures: Findings were compared with those presented in a similar study conducted in 2013. Interpretation was also informed by an appraisal of key issues that characterise the current context of health care in Australia.\\nResults: Masters’ degrees in health services management were offered by 18 universities. Common core subjects included management, evaluation, evidence, health system, governance, law and human resource management. A comparison with an earlier study conducted by Ritchie and Yen [1] found an increase in the following subjects: health system, quality management, health economics, policy and research, and a decrease in health information, epidemiology and resourcing. New knowledge areas included leadership, planning and project management, change management, and strategy.\\nConclusions: This paper presents a discussion on knowledge areas that comprise syllabus in masters level health services management education nationally. Key findings revealed differences between courses and the responsiveness of core syllabus to the current health care environment. The emergence of leadership, planning and project management was unsurprising while an absence of subjects that gave explicit reference to First Nations peoples was a notable finding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management\",\"volume\":\"86 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.1985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.1985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究旨在了解澳大利亚大学健康服务管理硕士课程所提供的核心知识领域:设计:通过谷歌搜索确定了相关的健康服务管理硕士学位。然后从每所大学的网站上提取课程大纲。然后对共同的核心科目进行整理和比较:研究数据来自澳大利亚大学网站:研究结果与 2013 年进行的一项类似研究的结果进行了比较。对澳大利亚医疗保健现状的关键问题进行了评估,并据此做出了解释:18所大学提供医疗服务管理硕士学位。共同的核心科目包括管理、评估、证据、医疗系统、治理、法律和人力资源管理。与 Ritchie 和 Yen [1] 早先进行的一项研究相比,发现以下科目有所增加:卫生系统、质量管理、卫生经济学、政策和研究,而卫生信息、流行病学和资源配置则有所减少。新的知识领域包括领导力、规划和项目管理、变革管理和战略:本文对全国卫生服务管理硕士教育大纲的知识领域进行了讨论。主要研究结果显示了不同课程之间的差异,以及核心教学大纲对当前医疗环境的适应性。领导力、规划和项目管理的出现不足为奇,而缺乏明确提及原住民的科目则是一个值得注意的发现。
Australian Health Services Management Courses: A discussion on syllabus
Objective: The aim of this research was to understand core knowledge areas offered by Masters courses in health services management in Australian universities.
Design: A Google search identified relevant Masters’ degrees in health services management. Course syllabus was then extracted from each university’s website. Common core subjects were then collated and compared.
Setting: Data for this study was collected from Australian university websites.Main outcome measures: Findings were compared with those presented in a similar study conducted in 2013. Interpretation was also informed by an appraisal of key issues that characterise the current context of health care in Australia.
Results: Masters’ degrees in health services management were offered by 18 universities. Common core subjects included management, evaluation, evidence, health system, governance, law and human resource management. A comparison with an earlier study conducted by Ritchie and Yen [1] found an increase in the following subjects: health system, quality management, health economics, policy and research, and a decrease in health information, epidemiology and resourcing. New knowledge areas included leadership, planning and project management, change management, and strategy.
Conclusions: This paper presents a discussion on knowledge areas that comprise syllabus in masters level health services management education nationally. Key findings revealed differences between courses and the responsiveness of core syllabus to the current health care environment. The emergence of leadership, planning and project management was unsurprising while an absence of subjects that gave explicit reference to First Nations peoples was a notable finding.