{"title":"近红外透射法与数字咬合射线摄影法在近端龋齿检测方面的比较","authors":"Veselina Todorova, Ivan Filipov","doi":"10.5272/jimab.2023294.5282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proximal caries is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Aim: to study the diagnostic accuracy of near-infrared transillumination (DIAGNOcam, KaVo) compared to digital bitewing radiography for initial proximal caries diagnosis. Materials and methods: 1600 proximal surfaces of premolars and molars of 50 patients were examined with DIAGNOcam and digital bitewing radiography, and the level of agreement between them was established. Results: for the diagnosis of proximal caries in dentin, a complete (100%) coincidence of the findings with the type of tooth and type of surface was established. For the diagnosis of proximal caries in enamel, a high level of agreement between the two methods was found, as transillumination with near-infrared light is more sensitive than digital bitewing radiography. Conclusion: DIAGNOcam is a promising screening device in clinical practice for early proximal caries detection.","PeriodicalId":339756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NEAR-INFRARED TRANSILLUMINATION COMPARED TO DIGITAL BITEWING RADIOGRAPHY FOR PROXIMAL CARIES DETECTION\",\"authors\":\"Veselina Todorova, Ivan Filipov\",\"doi\":\"10.5272/jimab.2023294.5282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proximal caries is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Aim: to study the diagnostic accuracy of near-infrared transillumination (DIAGNOcam, KaVo) compared to digital bitewing radiography for initial proximal caries diagnosis. Materials and methods: 1600 proximal surfaces of premolars and molars of 50 patients were examined with DIAGNOcam and digital bitewing radiography, and the level of agreement between them was established. Results: for the diagnosis of proximal caries in dentin, a complete (100%) coincidence of the findings with the type of tooth and type of surface was established. For the diagnosis of proximal caries in enamel, a high level of agreement between the two methods was found, as transillumination with near-infrared light is more sensitive than digital bitewing radiography. Conclusion: DIAGNOcam is a promising screening device in clinical practice for early proximal caries detection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2023294.5282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2023294.5282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
NEAR-INFRARED TRANSILLUMINATION COMPARED TO DIGITAL BITEWING RADIOGRAPHY FOR PROXIMAL CARIES DETECTION
Proximal caries is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Aim: to study the diagnostic accuracy of near-infrared transillumination (DIAGNOcam, KaVo) compared to digital bitewing radiography for initial proximal caries diagnosis. Materials and methods: 1600 proximal surfaces of premolars and molars of 50 patients were examined with DIAGNOcam and digital bitewing radiography, and the level of agreement between them was established. Results: for the diagnosis of proximal caries in dentin, a complete (100%) coincidence of the findings with the type of tooth and type of surface was established. For the diagnosis of proximal caries in enamel, a high level of agreement between the two methods was found, as transillumination with near-infrared light is more sensitive than digital bitewing radiography. Conclusion: DIAGNOcam is a promising screening device in clinical practice for early proximal caries detection.