在主教堂和教堂之间:后统一时期安特里姆和唐恩的启蒙遗产

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frank Ferguson
{"title":"在主教堂和教堂之间:后统一时期安特里姆和唐恩的启蒙遗产","authors":"Frank Ferguson","doi":"10.24162/ei2023-12200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay looks at post 1798 tensions in Belfast, Antrim and Down, using a survey of literary and cultural texts. It notes a range of responses to the first two decades of the nineteenth century in those associated with United Irish aspiration and those associated with maintaining establishment control. On one hand there was a maintenance of the publication of United Irish political, cultural thought and language in the first two decades after the union through continued publication of collections of poetry and other works (Samuel Thomson, James Orr, William Drennan). The essay explores how this work took shape and how it responded to the trauma of 1798, particularly in how the Scots language was deployed as a cultural tool/ weapon in the early 1800s. Alongside this, I discuss the creation and development of a range of “Enlightenment” ventures such as Academical Institution, Poor House, Literary Society and question the extent of these undertakings by looking at how far these were “enlightenment” or were generated by factional, mercantile interests operating under the guise of philanthropic endeavours (e.g. extension of cotton industry in Belfast, economic expansion built on Transatlantic slave trade, imperialist/colonialist animus of many ventures, rewriting of recent history to fit establishment view). These developments are contextualised and questioned alongside the creation of post-Union “Union-ist” Agendas and Groupings (Conservative Anglican and Presbyterian alliances in the cultural sphere in the work of Bishop Thomas Percy, Thomas Romney Robinson, Hugh Porter and Thomas Stott). The trauma and memory of the late eighteenth century left a legacy played out in Belfast’s development post Union and in its articulation, or non-articulation as an Enlightenment space.","PeriodicalId":53822,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Irlandeses","volume":" 43","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between the Bishop’s Hall and the Hurchin: Enlightenment Legacies in Post-Union Antrim and Down\",\"authors\":\"Frank Ferguson\",\"doi\":\"10.24162/ei2023-12200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay looks at post 1798 tensions in Belfast, Antrim and Down, using a survey of literary and cultural texts. It notes a range of responses to the first two decades of the nineteenth century in those associated with United Irish aspiration and those associated with maintaining establishment control. On one hand there was a maintenance of the publication of United Irish political, cultural thought and language in the first two decades after the union through continued publication of collections of poetry and other works (Samuel Thomson, James Orr, William Drennan). The essay explores how this work took shape and how it responded to the trauma of 1798, particularly in how the Scots language was deployed as a cultural tool/ weapon in the early 1800s. Alongside this, I discuss the creation and development of a range of “Enlightenment” ventures such as Academical Institution, Poor House, Literary Society and question the extent of these undertakings by looking at how far these were “enlightenment” or were generated by factional, mercantile interests operating under the guise of philanthropic endeavours (e.g. extension of cotton industry in Belfast, economic expansion built on Transatlantic slave trade, imperialist/colonialist animus of many ventures, rewriting of recent history to fit establishment view). These developments are contextualised and questioned alongside the creation of post-Union “Union-ist” Agendas and Groupings (Conservative Anglican and Presbyterian alliances in the cultural sphere in the work of Bishop Thomas Percy, Thomas Romney Robinson, Hugh Porter and Thomas Stott). The trauma and memory of the late eighteenth century left a legacy played out in Belfast’s development post Union and in its articulation, or non-articulation as an Enlightenment space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios Irlandeses\",\"volume\":\" 43\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios Irlandeses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24162/ei2023-12200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Irlandeses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24162/ei2023-12200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过对文学和文化文本的调查,探讨了 1798 年后贝尔法斯特、安特立姆和唐地区的紧张局势。文章指出,在十九世纪的前二十年中,与统一爱尔兰的愿望相关的人和与维持统治相关的人做出了一系列反应。一方面,通过继续出版诗集和其他作品(塞缪尔-汤姆森、詹姆斯-奥尔、威廉-德伦南),在联合后的头二十年里,爱尔兰统一政治、文化思想和语言的出版物得以维持。这篇文章探讨了这些作品是如何形成的,又是如何对 1798 年的创伤做出回应的,尤其是在 19 世纪早期苏格兰语言是如何被用作文化工具/武器的。与此同时,我还讨论了一系列 "启蒙 "事业的创建和发展,如学术机构、济贫院、文学社等,并对这些事业的程度提出了质疑,研究这些事业在多大程度上是 "启蒙 "的,或者是由打着慈善事业幌子的派系和重商利益所催生的(例如:在伯明翰扩展棉花产业)。例如,贝尔法斯特棉花产业的扩展、建立在跨大西洋奴隶贸易基础上的经济扩张、许多企业的帝国主义/殖民主义敌意、改写近代史以适应当权者的观点)。这些发展与后英国统一时期的 "联盟主义 "议程和团体(托马斯-珀西主教、托马斯-罗姆尼-罗宾逊、休-波特和托马斯-斯托特在文化领域的保守派圣公会和长老会联盟)的创建一起,受到了语境的影响和质疑。十八世纪末的创伤和记忆在贝尔法斯特联邦后的发展中,以及在其作为启蒙空间的表达或不表达中,都留下了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between the Bishop’s Hall and the Hurchin: Enlightenment Legacies in Post-Union Antrim and Down
This essay looks at post 1798 tensions in Belfast, Antrim and Down, using a survey of literary and cultural texts. It notes a range of responses to the first two decades of the nineteenth century in those associated with United Irish aspiration and those associated with maintaining establishment control. On one hand there was a maintenance of the publication of United Irish political, cultural thought and language in the first two decades after the union through continued publication of collections of poetry and other works (Samuel Thomson, James Orr, William Drennan). The essay explores how this work took shape and how it responded to the trauma of 1798, particularly in how the Scots language was deployed as a cultural tool/ weapon in the early 1800s. Alongside this, I discuss the creation and development of a range of “Enlightenment” ventures such as Academical Institution, Poor House, Literary Society and question the extent of these undertakings by looking at how far these were “enlightenment” or were generated by factional, mercantile interests operating under the guise of philanthropic endeavours (e.g. extension of cotton industry in Belfast, economic expansion built on Transatlantic slave trade, imperialist/colonialist animus of many ventures, rewriting of recent history to fit establishment view). These developments are contextualised and questioned alongside the creation of post-Union “Union-ist” Agendas and Groupings (Conservative Anglican and Presbyterian alliances in the cultural sphere in the work of Bishop Thomas Percy, Thomas Romney Robinson, Hugh Porter and Thomas Stott). The trauma and memory of the late eighteenth century left a legacy played out in Belfast’s development post Union and in its articulation, or non-articulation as an Enlightenment space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Estudios Irlandeses
Estudios Irlandeses HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信