基于模糊逻辑的挡土墙稳定性预测

Esra Aslı Çubukçu, Esra Uray, Vahdettin Demir
{"title":"基于模糊逻辑的挡土墙稳定性预测","authors":"Esra Aslı Çubukçu, Esra Uray, Vahdettin Demir","doi":"10.20528/cjsmec.2023.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In geotechnical engineering, retaining walls are widely employed to solve the problem of supporting horizontal loads occurring between two different soil levels. In the traditional retaining wall design, stability checks continue until a safe design is obtained according to selected wall dimensions and soil properties. This design method is a process that is time-consuming and based on trial and error. In this study, the stability control of the retaining wall, which is a complex engineering design, has been carried out with fuzzy logic methods. Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference systems (ANFISs) including Grid Partition (ANFIS-GP) and Substructive Clustering (ANFIS-SC) have been utilized as fuzzy logic methods. The sliding stability criterion of the cantilever retaining wall has been obtained by performing 1024 retaining wall designs which are created using different wall dimensions. Ninety percent and ten percent of the 1024 sliding safety factor values acquired through numerical analyses were respectively allocated to the training and testing phases. The prediction performances of the methods have been evaluated by considering the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Coefficient of Determination (R²) obtained for the sliding safety factors during the training and testing stages. Upon juxtaposing the actual and anticipated sliding safety factors for a dataset comprising 1024 observations, it has become evident that the ANFIS-SC methodology outperforms the ANFIS-GP approach in terms of predictive accuracy. Furthermore, this analysis culminated in the determination that the application of fuzzy logic methods stands as an efficacious and dependable means for checking the stability criteria of retaining walls.","PeriodicalId":488266,"journal":{"name":"Challenge journal of structural mechanics","volume":" 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy logic based prediction of retaining wall stability\",\"authors\":\"Esra Aslı Çubukçu, Esra Uray, Vahdettin Demir\",\"doi\":\"10.20528/cjsmec.2023.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In geotechnical engineering, retaining walls are widely employed to solve the problem of supporting horizontal loads occurring between two different soil levels. In the traditional retaining wall design, stability checks continue until a safe design is obtained according to selected wall dimensions and soil properties. This design method is a process that is time-consuming and based on trial and error. In this study, the stability control of the retaining wall, which is a complex engineering design, has been carried out with fuzzy logic methods. Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference systems (ANFISs) including Grid Partition (ANFIS-GP) and Substructive Clustering (ANFIS-SC) have been utilized as fuzzy logic methods. The sliding stability criterion of the cantilever retaining wall has been obtained by performing 1024 retaining wall designs which are created using different wall dimensions. Ninety percent and ten percent of the 1024 sliding safety factor values acquired through numerical analyses were respectively allocated to the training and testing phases. The prediction performances of the methods have been evaluated by considering the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Coefficient of Determination (R²) obtained for the sliding safety factors during the training and testing stages. Upon juxtaposing the actual and anticipated sliding safety factors for a dataset comprising 1024 observations, it has become evident that the ANFIS-SC methodology outperforms the ANFIS-GP approach in terms of predictive accuracy. Furthermore, this analysis culminated in the determination that the application of fuzzy logic methods stands as an efficacious and dependable means for checking the stability criteria of retaining walls.\",\"PeriodicalId\":488266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Challenge journal of structural mechanics\",\"volume\":\" 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Challenge journal of structural mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2023.04.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenge journal of structural mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2023.04.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在岩土工程中,挡土墙被广泛用于解决两个不同土层之间的水平荷载支撑问题。在传统的挡土墙设计中,稳定性检查一直持续到根据选定的墙体尺寸和土壤特性获得安全设计为止。这种设计方法费时费力,而且需要反复试验。本研究采用模糊逻辑方法对挡土墙这一复杂工程设计进行稳定性控制。基于自适应网络的模糊推理系统(ANFIS),包括网格划分(ANFIS-GP)和子结构聚类(ANFIS-SC)被用作模糊逻辑方法。悬臂式挡土墙的滑动稳定性标准是通过 1024 个挡土墙设计得出的,这些设计采用了不同的墙体尺寸。通过数值分析获得的 1024 个滑动安全系数值中的 90% 和 10% 分别被分配到训练和测试阶段。通过考虑在训练和测试阶段获得的滑动安全系数的均方根误差 (RMSE)、平均绝对误差 (MAE) 和决定系数 (R²),对这些方法的预测性能进行了评估。将包含 1024 个观测值的数据集的实际滑动安全系数与预期滑动安全系数并列后,可以明显看出 ANFIS-SC 方法在预测准确性方面优于 ANFIS-GP 方法。此外,这项分析最终确定,应用模糊逻辑方法是检查挡土墙稳定性标准的一种有效而可靠的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fuzzy logic based prediction of retaining wall stability
In geotechnical engineering, retaining walls are widely employed to solve the problem of supporting horizontal loads occurring between two different soil levels. In the traditional retaining wall design, stability checks continue until a safe design is obtained according to selected wall dimensions and soil properties. This design method is a process that is time-consuming and based on trial and error. In this study, the stability control of the retaining wall, which is a complex engineering design, has been carried out with fuzzy logic methods. Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference systems (ANFISs) including Grid Partition (ANFIS-GP) and Substructive Clustering (ANFIS-SC) have been utilized as fuzzy logic methods. The sliding stability criterion of the cantilever retaining wall has been obtained by performing 1024 retaining wall designs which are created using different wall dimensions. Ninety percent and ten percent of the 1024 sliding safety factor values acquired through numerical analyses were respectively allocated to the training and testing phases. The prediction performances of the methods have been evaluated by considering the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Coefficient of Determination (R²) obtained for the sliding safety factors during the training and testing stages. Upon juxtaposing the actual and anticipated sliding safety factors for a dataset comprising 1024 observations, it has become evident that the ANFIS-SC methodology outperforms the ANFIS-GP approach in terms of predictive accuracy. Furthermore, this analysis culminated in the determination that the application of fuzzy logic methods stands as an efficacious and dependable means for checking the stability criteria of retaining walls.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信