住宅楼内停车位的征税问题。根据宪法法院 2023 年 10 月 18 日的判决,参见第 SK 23/19 号法律。第 SK 23/19 号法律

Tomasz Tomasz Wołowiec, M. Kępa, Iwona Florek
{"title":"住宅楼内停车位的征税问题。根据宪法法院 2023 年 10 月 18 日的判决,参见第 SK 23/19 号法律。第 SK 23/19 号法律","authors":"Tomasz Tomasz Wołowiec, M. Kępa, Iwona Florek","doi":"10.13166/jms/176403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 18 October 2023, the Constitutional Tribunal handed down its second 'revolutionary' verdict in three months on the grounds of property tax (ref. SK 23/19), once again stating the unconstitutionality of the provisions of the law governing it - this time only with regard to a specific interpretation of the provisions. Indeed, the Court found that both the definition of a building and the provisions on property tax rates are unconstitutional to the extent that they would result in the recognition that garages with separate ownership located in residential buildings are to be taxed at the rate for other (higher) buildings and not at the rate provided for residential buildings.","PeriodicalId":16359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of modern science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taxation of parking place in residential buildings. Glosa to the judgment of the constitutional \\ncourt of 18 October 2023 ref. Act No SK 23/19\",\"authors\":\"Tomasz Tomasz Wołowiec, M. Kępa, Iwona Florek\",\"doi\":\"10.13166/jms/176403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 18 October 2023, the Constitutional Tribunal handed down its second 'revolutionary' verdict in three months on the grounds of property tax (ref. SK 23/19), once again stating the unconstitutionality of the provisions of the law governing it - this time only with regard to a specific interpretation of the provisions. Indeed, the Court found that both the definition of a building and the provisions on property tax rates are unconstitutional to the extent that they would result in the recognition that garages with separate ownership located in residential buildings are to be taxed at the rate for other (higher) buildings and not at the rate provided for residential buildings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of modern science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of modern science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/176403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of modern science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/176403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023 年 10 月 18 日,宪法法庭就财产税问题做出了三个月内的第二次 "革命性 "判决(参见 SK 23/19),再次指出有关财产税的法律条款违宪--这一次仅涉及对条款的具体解释。事实上,法院认为,建筑物的定义和财产税率的规定都是违宪的,因为它们会导致承认住宅楼内拥有独立所有权的车库应按照其他(较高)建筑物的税率而不是住宅楼的税率征税。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taxation of parking place in residential buildings. Glosa to the judgment of the constitutional court of 18 October 2023 ref. Act No SK 23/19
On 18 October 2023, the Constitutional Tribunal handed down its second 'revolutionary' verdict in three months on the grounds of property tax (ref. SK 23/19), once again stating the unconstitutionality of the provisions of the law governing it - this time only with regard to a specific interpretation of the provisions. Indeed, the Court found that both the definition of a building and the provisions on property tax rates are unconstitutional to the extent that they would result in the recognition that garages with separate ownership located in residential buildings are to be taxed at the rate for other (higher) buildings and not at the rate provided for residential buildings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信