{"title":"共轭词中有什么?","authors":"Terrance Gatchalian","doi":"10.33137/twpl.v46i1.39252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops a syntactic account for Kirundi's two \"copulas\", the inflecting -ri and the invariant ni. I propose that these two morphemes correspond to two distinct syntactic positions, v and C respectively. This stands in contrast to a previous, semantic account for the analogous system in Kinyarwanda. I present morphological and distributional data which support the view that -ri lexicalizes v for two reasons: (i) to permit the projection of independently necessary verbal inflectional heads and to morphologically host the affixes that lexicalize them and (ii) to bind the eventuality variable introduced by location-denoting PP predicates. The two conditions are unified under the analysis that -ri, but not ni, indicates the presence of v. I argue that this account is able to capture a wider range of the distribution and properties of the two \"copulas\" than prior accounts.","PeriodicalId":442006,"journal":{"name":"Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics","volume":"12 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What's in a copula?\",\"authors\":\"Terrance Gatchalian\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/twpl.v46i1.39252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper develops a syntactic account for Kirundi's two \\\"copulas\\\", the inflecting -ri and the invariant ni. I propose that these two morphemes correspond to two distinct syntactic positions, v and C respectively. This stands in contrast to a previous, semantic account for the analogous system in Kinyarwanda. I present morphological and distributional data which support the view that -ri lexicalizes v for two reasons: (i) to permit the projection of independently necessary verbal inflectional heads and to morphologically host the affixes that lexicalize them and (ii) to bind the eventuality variable introduced by location-denoting PP predicates. The two conditions are unified under the analysis that -ri, but not ni, indicates the presence of v. I argue that this account is able to capture a wider range of the distribution and properties of the two \\\"copulas\\\" than prior accounts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"12 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/twpl.v46i1.39252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/twpl.v46i1.39252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文对基隆迪语的两个 "共轭词"--转折词 -ri 和不变词 ni--进行了句法解释。我认为这两个词素分别对应两个不同的句法位置,即 v 和 C。这与之前基尼亚卢旺达语中类似系统的语义解释形成了鲜明对比。我提出的形态学和分布学数据支持这样的观点,即-ri词化v有两个原因:(i) 允许投射独立的必要动词词性头,并在形态学上容纳使其词化的词缀;(ii) 结合由表示位置的PP谓词引入的事件变量。这两个条件在-ri(而非 ni)表示 v 的存在这一分析下得到了统一。我认为,与之前的解释相比,这一解释能够捕捉到这两个 "共轭词 "更广泛的分布和属性。
This paper develops a syntactic account for Kirundi's two "copulas", the inflecting -ri and the invariant ni. I propose that these two morphemes correspond to two distinct syntactic positions, v and C respectively. This stands in contrast to a previous, semantic account for the analogous system in Kinyarwanda. I present morphological and distributional data which support the view that -ri lexicalizes v for two reasons: (i) to permit the projection of independently necessary verbal inflectional heads and to morphologically host the affixes that lexicalize them and (ii) to bind the eventuality variable introduced by location-denoting PP predicates. The two conditions are unified under the analysis that -ri, but not ni, indicates the presence of v. I argue that this account is able to capture a wider range of the distribution and properties of the two "copulas" than prior accounts.