供应相关数据和敏捷项目管理--它们之间有什么关系?

Volker Amelung, W. Hoffmann, Thomas Elter, M. Klinkhammer-Schalke, U. Marschall, O. Schmalz
{"title":"供应相关数据和敏捷项目管理--它们之间有什么关系?","authors":"Volker Amelung, W. Hoffmann, Thomas Elter, M. Klinkhammer-Schalke, U. Marschall, O. Schmalz","doi":"10.24945/mvf.06.23.1866-0533.2561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cochrane postulates that ‚the best available evidence‘ (www.cochrane.org) must be the basis for medical decisions and that the quality of the study design is therefore crucial. From this it can be concluded that, in addition to randomised controlled trials (RCTs), healthcare-related data can also be used. Questions relating to particularly rare diseases, which increasingly include ever smaller subgroups of common diseases (individualised therapies, e.g. based on certain genetic characteristics), as well as increasingly important endpoints such as Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) cannot be clarified in an RCT. Instead of a specific study design, the focus should be on the quality of studies. It is therefore by no means a question of weakening requirements, but rather of consistently increasing the quality of studies in which new data sources can also be included. The following text is a reflection on the workshop ‚RWE - Fit-for-purpose‘ at the MSD Health Forum 2023, on the one hand, and some thoughts on the undogmatic handling of data sources based on ideas from management theory, on the other.","PeriodicalId":486737,"journal":{"name":"Monitor Versorgungsforschung","volume":"42 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Versorgungsnahe Daten und agiles Projekt- management – was hat das miteinander zu tun?\",\"authors\":\"Volker Amelung, W. Hoffmann, Thomas Elter, M. Klinkhammer-Schalke, U. Marschall, O. Schmalz\",\"doi\":\"10.24945/mvf.06.23.1866-0533.2561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cochrane postulates that ‚the best available evidence‘ (www.cochrane.org) must be the basis for medical decisions and that the quality of the study design is therefore crucial. From this it can be concluded that, in addition to randomised controlled trials (RCTs), healthcare-related data can also be used. Questions relating to particularly rare diseases, which increasingly include ever smaller subgroups of common diseases (individualised therapies, e.g. based on certain genetic characteristics), as well as increasingly important endpoints such as Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) cannot be clarified in an RCT. Instead of a specific study design, the focus should be on the quality of studies. It is therefore by no means a question of weakening requirements, but rather of consistently increasing the quality of studies in which new data sources can also be included. The following text is a reflection on the workshop ‚RWE - Fit-for-purpose‘ at the MSD Health Forum 2023, on the one hand, and some thoughts on the undogmatic handling of data sources based on ideas from management theory, on the other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":486737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monitor Versorgungsforschung\",\"volume\":\"42 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monitor Versorgungsforschung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24945/mvf.06.23.1866-0533.2561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monitor Versorgungsforschung","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24945/mvf.06.23.1866-0533.2561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科克伦认为,"最佳可用证据"(www.cochrane.org)必须是医疗决策的基础,因此研究设计的质量至关重要。由此可以得出结论,除了随机对照试验 (RCT),还可以使用与医疗保健相关的数据。与罕见病有关的问题,尤其是罕见病,越来越多地包括常见病中越来越小的亚组(个体化疗法,如基于某些遗传特征的疗法),以及越来越重要的终点,如患者报告结果测量法(PROM)和患者报告体验测量法(PREM),都无法通过随机对照试验来阐明。与其关注特定的研究设计,不如关注研究的质量。因此,这绝不是一个弱化要求的问题,而是一个不断提高研究质量的问题,在研究中也可以纳入新的数据源。以下内容一方面是对 2023 年 MSD 健康论坛 "RWE - 适合目的 "研讨会的反思,另一方面是基于管理理论思想对无教条地处理数据源的一些思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Versorgungsnahe Daten und agiles Projekt- management – was hat das miteinander zu tun?
Cochrane postulates that ‚the best available evidence‘ (www.cochrane.org) must be the basis for medical decisions and that the quality of the study design is therefore crucial. From this it can be concluded that, in addition to randomised controlled trials (RCTs), healthcare-related data can also be used. Questions relating to particularly rare diseases, which increasingly include ever smaller subgroups of common diseases (individualised therapies, e.g. based on certain genetic characteristics), as well as increasingly important endpoints such as Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) cannot be clarified in an RCT. Instead of a specific study design, the focus should be on the quality of studies. It is therefore by no means a question of weakening requirements, but rather of consistently increasing the quality of studies in which new data sources can also be included. The following text is a reflection on the workshop ‚RWE - Fit-for-purpose‘ at the MSD Health Forum 2023, on the one hand, and some thoughts on the undogmatic handling of data sources based on ideas from management theory, on the other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信