S. Fyodorov 眼科显微手术国家机构圣彼得堡分院的能量白内障手术:27 年经验分析

E.V. Boiko, M. Nemsitsveridze, S. Shukhaev, E.A. Simak
{"title":"S. Fyodorov 眼科显微手术国家机构圣彼得堡分院的能量白内障手术:27 年经验分析","authors":"E.V. Boiko, M. Nemsitsveridze, S. Shukhaev, E.A. Simak","doi":"10.25276/0235-4160-2023-3s-16-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. Based on a comparative analysis of the results of using various laser methods of cataract treatment in the process of developing energy surgery in the St. Petersburg branch The S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, to determine the advantages and disadvantages of the technologies used. Material and methods. Analysis of the results of laser cataract extraction, ultrasonic phacoemulsification and combined surgery is based on data from a study of 28 802 surgical interventions (Phacoemulsification (Phaco) – 15 520, laser cataract extraction (LCE) – 7945, FemtoPhaco – 5135, FemtoLCE – 202) performed over the period 1995–2022. Results.The operative complication rate was 0.6, 0.55, 0.5 and 0% for Phaco, LCE, FemtoPhaco and FemtoLCE respectively. Visual acuity after LCE and FemtoLCE >0.8 was observed in more than 70% of cases, and in other groups such a functional result was achieved in 57% of cases. Comparing the postoperative spherical equivalent, a significant difference was noted only between the FemtoPhaco and standard Phaco (p=0.03), and between FemtoLCE and LCE groups (p=0.01), it indicates the advantage of femtolaser support for cataract surgery getting in target refraction. Analysis of endothelial cells loss reflects a significant advantage in groups with femtolaser support (p=0.01; p=0.02), as well as in the group of LCE and FemtoLCE over standard Phaco (p=0.01; p=0.02, respectively). Conclusion. Laser cataract extraction is an effective and safe technology that can be compared to ultrasonic phacoemulsification. The use of femtosecond laser assistance provides significantly lower deviation from the planned postoperative refraction. Modern laser technologies are safe and can reduce the risk of endothelial loss more effectively than standard Phaco. Key words: laser cataract extraction, femtosecond laser, femto laser assisted cataract surgery, cataract phacoemulsification, endothelial cell density","PeriodicalId":424200,"journal":{"name":"Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery","volume":"73 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy cataract surgery in the St. Petersburg branch of the S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery State Institution: analysis of 27-year experience\",\"authors\":\"E.V. Boiko, M. Nemsitsveridze, S. Shukhaev, E.A. Simak\",\"doi\":\"10.25276/0235-4160-2023-3s-16-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose. Based on a comparative analysis of the results of using various laser methods of cataract treatment in the process of developing energy surgery in the St. Petersburg branch The S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, to determine the advantages and disadvantages of the technologies used. Material and methods. Analysis of the results of laser cataract extraction, ultrasonic phacoemulsification and combined surgery is based on data from a study of 28 802 surgical interventions (Phacoemulsification (Phaco) – 15 520, laser cataract extraction (LCE) – 7945, FemtoPhaco – 5135, FemtoLCE – 202) performed over the period 1995–2022. Results.The operative complication rate was 0.6, 0.55, 0.5 and 0% for Phaco, LCE, FemtoPhaco and FemtoLCE respectively. Visual acuity after LCE and FemtoLCE >0.8 was observed in more than 70% of cases, and in other groups such a functional result was achieved in 57% of cases. Comparing the postoperative spherical equivalent, a significant difference was noted only between the FemtoPhaco and standard Phaco (p=0.03), and between FemtoLCE and LCE groups (p=0.01), it indicates the advantage of femtolaser support for cataract surgery getting in target refraction. Analysis of endothelial cells loss reflects a significant advantage in groups with femtolaser support (p=0.01; p=0.02), as well as in the group of LCE and FemtoLCE over standard Phaco (p=0.01; p=0.02, respectively). Conclusion. Laser cataract extraction is an effective and safe technology that can be compared to ultrasonic phacoemulsification. The use of femtosecond laser assistance provides significantly lower deviation from the planned postoperative refraction. Modern laser technologies are safe and can reduce the risk of endothelial loss more effectively than standard Phaco. Key words: laser cataract extraction, femtosecond laser, femto laser assisted cataract surgery, cataract phacoemulsification, endothelial cell density\",\"PeriodicalId\":424200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2023-3s-16-26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2023-3s-16-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的。根据对联邦国立圣彼得堡 S. Fyodorov 眼科显微外科分院在开展能量手术过程中使用各种激光方法治疗白内障的结果进行的比较分析,确定所使用技术的优缺点。材料和方法对激光白内障摘除术、超声乳化术和联合手术结果的分析是基于对1995-2022年期间进行的28 802例手术干预(超声乳化术(Phaco)- 15 520例,激光白内障摘除术(LCE)- 7945例,FemtoPhaco- 5135例,FemtoLCE- 202例)的研究数据。结果显示,Phaco、LCE、FemtoPhaco 和 FemtoLCE 的手术并发症发生率分别为 0.6%、0.55%、0.5% 和 0%。70%以上的病例在 LCE 和 FemtoLCE 术后视力大于 0.8,其他组别中 57% 的病例达到了这样的功能效果。比较术后球面等值,发现只有 FemtoPhaco 组和标准 Phaco 组(P=0.03)以及 FemtoLCE 组和 LCE 组(P=0.01)之间存在显著差异,这表明飞秒激光支持的白内障手术在获得目标屈光度方面具有优势。对内皮细胞损失的分析表明,使用飞秒激光支持的组别具有显著优势(p=0.01;p=0.02),LCE 和 FemtoLCE 组别也比标准 Phaco 组别具有显著优势(分别为 p=0.01;p=0.02)。结论激光白内障摘除术是一种有效、安全的技术,可与超声乳化术进行比较。使用飞秒激光辅助可显著降低术后屈光度的偏差。与标准超声乳化术相比,现代激光技术既安全又能更有效地降低内皮损失的风险。关键词: 激光白内障摘除术、飞秒激光、飞秒激光辅助白内障手术、白内障超声乳化术、内皮细胞密度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy cataract surgery in the St. Petersburg branch of the S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery State Institution: analysis of 27-year experience
Purpose. Based on a comparative analysis of the results of using various laser methods of cataract treatment in the process of developing energy surgery in the St. Petersburg branch The S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, to determine the advantages and disadvantages of the technologies used. Material and methods. Analysis of the results of laser cataract extraction, ultrasonic phacoemulsification and combined surgery is based on data from a study of 28 802 surgical interventions (Phacoemulsification (Phaco) – 15 520, laser cataract extraction (LCE) – 7945, FemtoPhaco – 5135, FemtoLCE – 202) performed over the period 1995–2022. Results.The operative complication rate was 0.6, 0.55, 0.5 and 0% for Phaco, LCE, FemtoPhaco and FemtoLCE respectively. Visual acuity after LCE and FemtoLCE >0.8 was observed in more than 70% of cases, and in other groups such a functional result was achieved in 57% of cases. Comparing the postoperative spherical equivalent, a significant difference was noted only between the FemtoPhaco and standard Phaco (p=0.03), and between FemtoLCE and LCE groups (p=0.01), it indicates the advantage of femtolaser support for cataract surgery getting in target refraction. Analysis of endothelial cells loss reflects a significant advantage in groups with femtolaser support (p=0.01; p=0.02), as well as in the group of LCE and FemtoLCE over standard Phaco (p=0.01; p=0.02, respectively). Conclusion. Laser cataract extraction is an effective and safe technology that can be compared to ultrasonic phacoemulsification. The use of femtosecond laser assistance provides significantly lower deviation from the planned postoperative refraction. Modern laser technologies are safe and can reduce the risk of endothelial loss more effectively than standard Phaco. Key words: laser cataract extraction, femtosecond laser, femto laser assisted cataract surgery, cataract phacoemulsification, endothelial cell density
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信