教育研究素养：哲学基础与经验应用

Professions and Professionalism Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.7577/pp.5307

Kim Pedersen Phillips, Andreas Eriksen, Sølvi Mausethagen

{"title":"教育研究素养：哲学基础与经验应用","authors":"Kim Pedersen Phillips, Andreas Eriksen, Sølvi Mausethagen","doi":"10.7577/pp.5307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper offers a novel philosophical perspective on how research literacy should be conceptualised in the educational domain. Standard accounts of teacher research literacy consider it merely a subset of the skills of an educational researcher. Therefore, the accounts largely ignore the need to anchor or embed the mode of engagement with research in the particular demands of the professional role. By contrast, we argue that a virtue-based account of the epistemic agency involved in receiving testimony can help deliver a normatively attractive and empirically plausible account that is tailored to the role. We support the account with an original in-depth analysis of actual teacher engagement with research.","PeriodicalId":53464,"journal":{"name":"Professions and Professionalism","volume":"146 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational Research Literacy: Philosophical Foundations and Empirical Applications\",\"authors\":\"Kim Pedersen Phillips, Andreas Eriksen, Sølvi Mausethagen\",\"doi\":\"10.7577/pp.5307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper offers a novel philosophical perspective on how research literacy should be conceptualised in the educational domain. Standard accounts of teacher research literacy consider it merely a subset of the skills of an educational researcher. Therefore, the accounts largely ignore the need to anchor or embed the mode of engagement with research in the particular demands of the professional role. By contrast, we argue that a virtue-based account of the epistemic agency involved in receiving testimony can help deliver a normatively attractive and empirically plausible account that is tailored to the role. We support the account with an original in-depth analysis of actual teacher engagement with research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Professions and Professionalism\",\"volume\":\"146 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Professions and Professionalism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.5307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professions and Professionalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.5307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从一个新颖的哲学角度，阐述了在教育领域应如何构建研究素养的概念。关于教师研究素养的标准说法认为，它只是教育研究者技能的一个子集。因此，这些论述在很大程度上忽视了将参与研究的模式固定或嵌入专业角色的特殊要求中的必要性。与此相反，我们认为，以美德为基础的、关于接受证词所涉及的认识论机构的论述，有助于提供一种规范上有吸引力、经验上可信的论述，这种论述是为这一角色量身定制的。我们对教师参与研究的实际情况进行了独创性的深入分析，为这一观点提供了支持。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Educational Research Literacy: Philosophical Foundations and Empirical Applications

The paper offers a novel philosophical perspective on how research literacy should be conceptualised in the educational domain. Standard accounts of teacher research literacy consider it merely a subset of the skills of an educational researcher. Therefore, the accounts largely ignore the need to anchor or embed the mode of engagement with research in the particular demands of the professional role. By contrast, we argue that a virtue-based account of the epistemic agency involved in receiving testimony can help deliver a normatively attractive and empirically plausible account that is tailored to the role. We support the account with an original in-depth analysis of actual teacher engagement with research.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Professions and Professionalism Social Sciences-Education

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Professions and Professionalism (P&P) is an open-access, net-based, peer-reviewed and English-language journal. The Journal invites research-based empirical, theoretical or synoptic articles focusing on traditional professions as well as other knowledge-based occupational groups approached from any perspective or discipline. By prioritizing no single theoretical horizon or methodological approach, the journal creates a space for the development of the research field. Aims: To develop the study of professions and professionalism theoretically and empirically, To contribute to the development of the study of professions and professionalism as an international interdisciplinary field of research, To become an important publication channel for the international research community.