关于国际单位制基本单位与国际单位制派生单位的区别

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Richard J. C. Brown
{"title":"关于国际单位制基本单位与国际单位制派生单位的区别","authors":"Richard J. C. Brown","doi":"10.1088/1681-7575/ad141b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This letter discusses the criteria that should be considered when deciding whether or not the distinction between base units and derived units in the International System of Units (SI) is useful, a debate that has been reignited following the 2019 revision of the SI. It is proposed that the correct question to ask is whether the concept of independent quantities, and the dimensional analysis it allows, remains useful—since that is the ultimate origin of the distinction between SI base units and SI derived units. Furthermore, the letter explains that this distinction is not related to whether the defining constants used in the revised SI after 2019 are any more fundamental than they were previously, nor whether the links between defining constants and SI base units are any less direct than they were prior to 2019. Finally, an opinion is offered that the concept of quantity dimensions and dimensional analysis remains useful, and certainly does no harm.","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the distinction between SI base units and SI derived units\",\"authors\":\"Richard J. C. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1681-7575/ad141b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This letter discusses the criteria that should be considered when deciding whether or not the distinction between base units and derived units in the International System of Units (SI) is useful, a debate that has been reignited following the 2019 revision of the SI. It is proposed that the correct question to ask is whether the concept of independent quantities, and the dimensional analysis it allows, remains useful—since that is the ultimate origin of the distinction between SI base units and SI derived units. Furthermore, the letter explains that this distinction is not related to whether the defining constants used in the revised SI after 2019 are any more fundamental than they were previously, nor whether the links between defining constants and SI base units are any less direct than they were prior to 2019. Finally, an opinion is offered that the concept of quantity dimensions and dimensional analysis remains useful, and certainly does no harm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metrologia\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ad141b\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metrologia","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ad141b","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这封信讨论了在决定国际单位制(SI)中基本单位和派生单位之间的区别是否有用时应考虑的标准。信中提出,正确的问题应该是独立量的概念及其所允许的尺寸分析是否仍然有用--因为这是区分国际单位制基本单位和国际单位制派生单位的最终起源。此外,信中还解释说,这种区别与 2019 年后修订的国际单位制中使用的定义常数是否比以前更基本无关,也与定义常数和国际单位制基本单位之间的联系是否不如 2019 年前那么直接无关。最后,有一种观点认为,数量维度和维度分析的概念仍然有用,而且肯定没有坏处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the distinction between SI base units and SI derived units
This letter discusses the criteria that should be considered when deciding whether or not the distinction between base units and derived units in the International System of Units (SI) is useful, a debate that has been reignited following the 2019 revision of the SI. It is proposed that the correct question to ask is whether the concept of independent quantities, and the dimensional analysis it allows, remains useful—since that is the ultimate origin of the distinction between SI base units and SI derived units. Furthermore, the letter explains that this distinction is not related to whether the defining constants used in the revised SI after 2019 are any more fundamental than they were previously, nor whether the links between defining constants and SI base units are any less direct than they were prior to 2019. Finally, an opinion is offered that the concept of quantity dimensions and dimensional analysis remains useful, and certainly does no harm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metrologia
Metrologia 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published 6 times per year, Metrologia covers the fundamentals of measurements, particularly those dealing with the seven base units of the International System of Units (metre, kilogram, second, ampere, kelvin, candela, mole) or proposals to replace them. The journal also publishes papers that contribute to the solution of difficult measurement problems and improve the accuracy of derived units and constants that are of fundamental importance to physics. In addition to regular papers, the journal publishes review articles, issues devoted to single topics of timely interest and occasional conference proceedings. Letters to the Editor and Short Communications (generally three pages or less) are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信