大型学术医疗中心自动配药柜库存管理模式比较

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Thomas Walczyk, John D. Hill, Carla Gill, Lisa Hurowitz, David Stimler, Gary Flax, Christopher Boreen, Edward Lau
{"title":"大型学术医疗中心自动配药柜库存管理模式比较","authors":"Thomas Walczyk, John D. Hill, Carla Gill, Lisa Hurowitz, David Stimler, Gary Flax, Christopher Boreen, Edward Lau","doi":"10.1177/00185787231214416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare and evaluate 2 methods of inventory management in automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs). Methods: Ten profiled ADCs had 2 inventory management models implemented over 2 months. Implementation of the models on each ADC involved adjustment of par levels (desired accessible quantities of medication) and removal of medications not used in the past 90 days or more. The par levels of 5 ADCs were adjusted using a formula developed based on the economic order quantity model. The par levels of the other 5 ADCs were adjusted using a formula based on historical average daily usage. The study endpoints include stock out rate, vend:fill ratio, quantity of expired medications, and inventory carrying cost. Results: The total of number of medications stocked in the 10 ADCs was reduced from 3035 in a 2-month pre-implementation period to 2932 in a 2-month post-implementation period yielding a reduction of inventory carrying cost by $11 011. The mean stock out rate in both study groups increased and vend:fill ratio decreased after implementation. The quantity of expired medications increased in the modified economic order quantity formula inventory management model and decreased in the average daily usage inventory management model. Conclusion: The implementation of 2 inventory management models on ADCs had a negative impact on stock out rate and vend:fill ratio, a mixed impact on quantity of expired medications, and a positive impact on inventory carrying cost reduction.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Inventory Management Models in Automated Dispensing Cabinets at a Large Academic Medical Center\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Walczyk, John D. Hill, Carla Gill, Lisa Hurowitz, David Stimler, Gary Flax, Christopher Boreen, Edward Lau\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00185787231214416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To compare and evaluate 2 methods of inventory management in automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs). Methods: Ten profiled ADCs had 2 inventory management models implemented over 2 months. Implementation of the models on each ADC involved adjustment of par levels (desired accessible quantities of medication) and removal of medications not used in the past 90 days or more. The par levels of 5 ADCs were adjusted using a formula developed based on the economic order quantity model. The par levels of the other 5 ADCs were adjusted using a formula based on historical average daily usage. The study endpoints include stock out rate, vend:fill ratio, quantity of expired medications, and inventory carrying cost. Results: The total of number of medications stocked in the 10 ADCs was reduced from 3035 in a 2-month pre-implementation period to 2932 in a 2-month post-implementation period yielding a reduction of inventory carrying cost by $11 011. The mean stock out rate in both study groups increased and vend:fill ratio decreased after implementation. The quantity of expired medications increased in the modified economic order quantity formula inventory management model and decreased in the average daily usage inventory management model. Conclusion: The implementation of 2 inventory management models on ADCs had a negative impact on stock out rate and vend:fill ratio, a mixed impact on quantity of expired medications, and a positive impact on inventory carrying cost reduction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231214416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231214416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较并评估自动配药柜 (ADC) 中的两种库存管理方法。方法:在两个月的时间里,对十个自动配药柜实施了两种库存管理模式。在每台自动配药柜上实施这两种模式时,都要对准量(所需可获得的药品数量)进行调整,并移除过去 90 天或更长时间内未使用的药品。根据经济订货量模型制定的公式调整了 5 个 ADC 的标准配置水平。其他 5 种 ADC 的面值水平则根据历史日均用量的公式进行调整。研究终点包括缺货率、销售与填充比、过期药品数量和库存账面成本。研究结果10 家 ADC 的库存药品总数从实施前 2 个月的 3035 种减少到实施后 2 个月的 2932 种,库存成本减少了 11 011 美元。实施后,两个研究组的平均缺货率均有所上升,销售与填充比有所下降。在修改后的经济订货量公式库存管理模式中,过期药品数量增加,而在平均每日用量库存管理模式中,过期药品数量减少。结论在 ADC 上实施两种库存管理模式对缺货率和售出/补货比有负面影响,对过期药品数量有喜有忧,对降低库存账面成本有正面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Inventory Management Models in Automated Dispensing Cabinets at a Large Academic Medical Center
Purpose: To compare and evaluate 2 methods of inventory management in automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs). Methods: Ten profiled ADCs had 2 inventory management models implemented over 2 months. Implementation of the models on each ADC involved adjustment of par levels (desired accessible quantities of medication) and removal of medications not used in the past 90 days or more. The par levels of 5 ADCs were adjusted using a formula developed based on the economic order quantity model. The par levels of the other 5 ADCs were adjusted using a formula based on historical average daily usage. The study endpoints include stock out rate, vend:fill ratio, quantity of expired medications, and inventory carrying cost. Results: The total of number of medications stocked in the 10 ADCs was reduced from 3035 in a 2-month pre-implementation period to 2932 in a 2-month post-implementation period yielding a reduction of inventory carrying cost by $11 011. The mean stock out rate in both study groups increased and vend:fill ratio decreased after implementation. The quantity of expired medications increased in the modified economic order quantity formula inventory management model and decreased in the average daily usage inventory management model. Conclusion: The implementation of 2 inventory management models on ADCs had a negative impact on stock out rate and vend:fill ratio, a mixed impact on quantity of expired medications, and a positive impact on inventory carrying cost reduction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信