建立对话空间,重新思考评估人员的能力:从复杂健康干预措施评估中心组织的网络研讨会中汲取的经验教训

Sanjeev Sridharan, April Nakaima, Rachael Gibson, Claudeth White, A. Kalugampitiya, Randika L. De Mel, Madhuka Liyanagamage, Ian MacDougall
{"title":"建立对话空间,重新思考评估人员的能力:从复杂健康干预措施评估中心组织的网络研讨会中汲取的经验教训","authors":"Sanjeev Sridharan, April Nakaima, Rachael Gibson, Claudeth White, A. Kalugampitiya, Randika L. De Mel, Madhuka Liyanagamage, Ian MacDougall","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v19i46.971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:  There is a need to rethink evaluator competencies given the harsh and paralyzing realities of COVID.  The pandemic was a time where there was a need to balance diverse perspectives given the limited scientific evidence that existed when faced with a genuinely unprecedented time. In the Fall of 2021 (September to October), the Evaluation Centre for Complex Health Interventions in partnership with the Asia Pacific Evaluation Association organized a three-part webinar series in response to the multiple issues that surfaced during COVID-19, and specifically, the implications of the pandemic for rethinking evaluator competencies and evaluator training. The presenters were from multiple countries including India, Canada, USA, UK, and South Africa. \nPurpose: The presenters pushed for more responsive evaluation approaches to address inequities and sustainability and for a decolonized approach to knowledge building.  The webinar raised a number of themes that have potential implications for future discussions on evaluator competencies including:  enhancing evaluation contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the need to rethink evaluation criteria,  the need to embrace and address varieties of uncertainties,  focus on diversity and heterogeneity;  understanding the role of contexts in complex programs and policies;  the need to reconceptualize sustainability;  being more explicit about inequities and vulnerabilities; and the need to pay attention to systems and system dynamics. \nSetting:  The webinars were organized by the Evaluation Centre and the Asia Pacific Evaluation Association on a Zoom platform. \nIntervention: Not applicable. \nResearch Design: Not applicable. \nData Collection and Analysis: Not applicable. \nFindings: Not applicable.","PeriodicalId":91909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Spaces for Dialogues to Rethink Evaluator Competencies: Lessons from the Webinars Organized by the Evaluation Centre for Complex Health Interventions\",\"authors\":\"Sanjeev Sridharan, April Nakaima, Rachael Gibson, Claudeth White, A. Kalugampitiya, Randika L. De Mel, Madhuka Liyanagamage, Ian MacDougall\",\"doi\":\"10.56645/jmde.v19i46.971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:  There is a need to rethink evaluator competencies given the harsh and paralyzing realities of COVID.  The pandemic was a time where there was a need to balance diverse perspectives given the limited scientific evidence that existed when faced with a genuinely unprecedented time. In the Fall of 2021 (September to October), the Evaluation Centre for Complex Health Interventions in partnership with the Asia Pacific Evaluation Association organized a three-part webinar series in response to the multiple issues that surfaced during COVID-19, and specifically, the implications of the pandemic for rethinking evaluator competencies and evaluator training. The presenters were from multiple countries including India, Canada, USA, UK, and South Africa. \\nPurpose: The presenters pushed for more responsive evaluation approaches to address inequities and sustainability and for a decolonized approach to knowledge building.  The webinar raised a number of themes that have potential implications for future discussions on evaluator competencies including:  enhancing evaluation contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the need to rethink evaluation criteria,  the need to embrace and address varieties of uncertainties,  focus on diversity and heterogeneity;  understanding the role of contexts in complex programs and policies;  the need to reconceptualize sustainability;  being more explicit about inequities and vulnerabilities; and the need to pay attention to systems and system dynamics. \\nSetting:  The webinars were organized by the Evaluation Centre and the Asia Pacific Evaluation Association on a Zoom platform. \\nIntervention: Not applicable. \\nResearch Design: Not applicable. \\nData Collection and Analysis: Not applicable. \\nFindings: Not applicable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i46.971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i46.971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景: 鉴于 COVID 残酷而令人麻痹的现实,有必要重新思考评估人员的能力。 在大流行病时期,由于科学证据有限,面对真正前所未有的时代,需要平衡不同的观点。2021 年秋季(9 月至 10 月),复杂健康干预评估中心与亚太评估协会合作,针对 COVID-19 期间出现的多种问题,特别是大流行病对重新思考评估员能力和评估员培训的影响,组织了一个由三部分组成的系列网络研讨会。发言人来自印度、加拿大、美国、英国和南非等多个国家。目的:主讲人提倡采取更有针对性的评估方法,以解决不平等和可持续性问题,并 提倡采取非殖民化的知识积累方法。 网络研讨会提出了一些对未来关于评价者能力的讨论具有潜在影响的主题,包括:加强评价对可持续发展目标(SDGs)的贡献,需要重新思考评价标准,需要接受和解决各种不确定性,关注多样性和异质性;理解复杂的计划和政策中背景的作用;需要重新认识可持续性;更加明确不平等和脆弱性;以及需要关注系统和系统动态。背景: 网络研讨会由评估中心和亚太评估协会在 Zoom 平台上组织。干预措施:不适用。研究设计:不适用。数据收集与分析:不适用。研究结果:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building Spaces for Dialogues to Rethink Evaluator Competencies: Lessons from the Webinars Organized by the Evaluation Centre for Complex Health Interventions
Background:  There is a need to rethink evaluator competencies given the harsh and paralyzing realities of COVID.  The pandemic was a time where there was a need to balance diverse perspectives given the limited scientific evidence that existed when faced with a genuinely unprecedented time. In the Fall of 2021 (September to October), the Evaluation Centre for Complex Health Interventions in partnership with the Asia Pacific Evaluation Association organized a three-part webinar series in response to the multiple issues that surfaced during COVID-19, and specifically, the implications of the pandemic for rethinking evaluator competencies and evaluator training. The presenters were from multiple countries including India, Canada, USA, UK, and South Africa. Purpose: The presenters pushed for more responsive evaluation approaches to address inequities and sustainability and for a decolonized approach to knowledge building.  The webinar raised a number of themes that have potential implications for future discussions on evaluator competencies including:  enhancing evaluation contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the need to rethink evaluation criteria,  the need to embrace and address varieties of uncertainties,  focus on diversity and heterogeneity;  understanding the role of contexts in complex programs and policies;  the need to reconceptualize sustainability;  being more explicit about inequities and vulnerabilities; and the need to pay attention to systems and system dynamics. Setting:  The webinars were organized by the Evaluation Centre and the Asia Pacific Evaluation Association on a Zoom platform. Intervention: Not applicable. Research Design: Not applicable. Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable. Findings: Not applicable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信