双语学生在尝试用第二语言进行评估时的认知过程和策略

IF 0.7 Q3 LINGUISTICS
Xing San Teng, Janet Hsiao, Yuen Yi Lo
{"title":"双语学生在尝试用第二语言进行评估时的认知过程和策略","authors":"Xing San Teng, Janet Hsiao, Yuen Yi Lo","doi":"10.1075/jicb.23011.ten","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In bilingual education programs, students learn content knowledge through an additional language (L2). Their\n content knowledge is also assessed through their L2, which raises concerns about underestimating their actual learning. This study\n addresses such concerns by investigating the cognitive processes and strategies of bilingual learners when being assessed in their\n L2. 49 university students, divided into more proficient and less proficient L2 learners, participated in an eye-tracking\n experiment which captured their eye movements when attempting a biology assessment. They then reported their thinking processes\n and strategies during the assessment process in a stimulated recall. In general, the participants engaged in more cognitive\n processes when attempting questions that were more cognitively demanding and required productive language skills. The less\n proficient group had more and longer fixations and regressions than their more proficient counterparts, but the two groups\n reported similar strategies. These findings have implications for assessment design in bilingual education programs.","PeriodicalId":44473,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive processes and strategies of bilingual students when attempting assessments in an L2\",\"authors\":\"Xing San Teng, Janet Hsiao, Yuen Yi Lo\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jicb.23011.ten\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In bilingual education programs, students learn content knowledge through an additional language (L2). Their\\n content knowledge is also assessed through their L2, which raises concerns about underestimating their actual learning. This study\\n addresses such concerns by investigating the cognitive processes and strategies of bilingual learners when being assessed in their\\n L2. 49 university students, divided into more proficient and less proficient L2 learners, participated in an eye-tracking\\n experiment which captured their eye movements when attempting a biology assessment. They then reported their thinking processes\\n and strategies during the assessment process in a stimulated recall. In general, the participants engaged in more cognitive\\n processes when attempting questions that were more cognitively demanding and required productive language skills. The less\\n proficient group had more and longer fixations and regressions than their more proficient counterparts, but the two groups\\n reported similar strategies. These findings have implications for assessment design in bilingual education programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.23011.ten\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.23011.ten","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在双语教育项目中,学生通过额外的语言(L2)学习内容知识。他们的内容知识也是通过他们的第二语言来评估的,这就引起了低估他们实际学习情况的担忧。本研究通过调查双语学习者在接受第二语言评估时的认知过程和策略,来解决这些问题。49 名大学生(分为语言能力较强和语言能力较弱的学习者)参加了一项眼动跟踪实验,该实验捕捉了他们在尝试进行生物学评估时的眼球运动。然后,他们在刺激回忆中报告了自己在评估过程中的思维过程和策略。总体而言,在尝试认知要求较高且需要生产性语言技能的问题时,参与者参与了更多的认知过程。水平较低的组别比水平较高的组别有更多和更长时间的固定和倒退,但两组组别报告的策略相似。这些发现对双语教育项目中的评估设计具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive processes and strategies of bilingual students when attempting assessments in an L2
In bilingual education programs, students learn content knowledge through an additional language (L2). Their content knowledge is also assessed through their L2, which raises concerns about underestimating their actual learning. This study addresses such concerns by investigating the cognitive processes and strategies of bilingual learners when being assessed in their L2. 49 university students, divided into more proficient and less proficient L2 learners, participated in an eye-tracking experiment which captured their eye movements when attempting a biology assessment. They then reported their thinking processes and strategies during the assessment process in a stimulated recall. In general, the participants engaged in more cognitive processes when attempting questions that were more cognitively demanding and required productive language skills. The less proficient group had more and longer fixations and regressions than their more proficient counterparts, but the two groups reported similar strategies. These findings have implications for assessment design in bilingual education programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信