前现代低地国家的水资源管理和意识形态利益

Jim van der Meulen
{"title":"前现代低地国家的水资源管理和意识形态利益","authors":"Jim van der Meulen","doi":"10.52024/tseg.17836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that the long-term development of premodern Dutch water management was partly shaped through a combination of institutional factors, and cultural norms and values. Departing from the institutional focus in the narrow sense that predominates in Milja van Tielhof’s Consensus and conflict, it makes the case that historians should take into account the influence of changes in the nature and ideology of the Dutch political elite between the late medieval ‘princely period’ and the early modern Dutch Republic. This is mainly demonstrated in reference to changes around the ideological precept of the Common Good (bonum commune). Using a combination of late medieval and early modern examples, the central contention is that the oligarchical elite that came to dominate both water management and the overarching political structure of the Dutch Republic, acquired a new notion of ‘shared interests’ due to their engagement on all political levels of the new state.","PeriodicalId":420105,"journal":{"name":"TSEG - The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Waterbeheer en ideologische belangen in de premoderne Nederlanden\",\"authors\":\"Jim van der Meulen\",\"doi\":\"10.52024/tseg.17836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article argues that the long-term development of premodern Dutch water management was partly shaped through a combination of institutional factors, and cultural norms and values. Departing from the institutional focus in the narrow sense that predominates in Milja van Tielhof’s Consensus and conflict, it makes the case that historians should take into account the influence of changes in the nature and ideology of the Dutch political elite between the late medieval ‘princely period’ and the early modern Dutch Republic. This is mainly demonstrated in reference to changes around the ideological precept of the Common Good (bonum commune). Using a combination of late medieval and early modern examples, the central contention is that the oligarchical elite that came to dominate both water management and the overarching political structure of the Dutch Republic, acquired a new notion of ‘shared interests’ due to their engagement on all political levels of the new state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":420105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TSEG - The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TSEG - The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52024/tseg.17836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TSEG - The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52024/tseg.17836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,荷兰前现代水资源管理的长期发展在一定程度上是由制度因素、文化规范和价值观共同决定的。与米莉娅-范-蒂尔霍夫(Milja van Tielhof)的《共识与冲突》一书中狭义的制度重点不同,本文认为历史学家应考虑到中世纪晚期 "王室时期 "与近代早期荷兰共和国之间荷兰政治精英的性质和意识形态变化的影响。这主要体现在围绕 "共同利益"(bonum commune)这一意识形态戒律的变化上。结合中世纪晚期和近代早期的例子,核心论点是,寡头精英在荷兰共和国的水资源管理和总体政治结构中占据主导地位,由于他们参与了新国家的各个政治层面,他们获得了一种新的 "共同利益 "概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Waterbeheer en ideologische belangen in de premoderne Nederlanden
This article argues that the long-term development of premodern Dutch water management was partly shaped through a combination of institutional factors, and cultural norms and values. Departing from the institutional focus in the narrow sense that predominates in Milja van Tielhof’s Consensus and conflict, it makes the case that historians should take into account the influence of changes in the nature and ideology of the Dutch political elite between the late medieval ‘princely period’ and the early modern Dutch Republic. This is mainly demonstrated in reference to changes around the ideological precept of the Common Good (bonum commune). Using a combination of late medieval and early modern examples, the central contention is that the oligarchical elite that came to dominate both water management and the overarching political structure of the Dutch Republic, acquired a new notion of ‘shared interests’ due to their engagement on all political levels of the new state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信