{"title":"前现代低地国家的水资源管理和意识形态利益","authors":"Jim van der Meulen","doi":"10.52024/tseg.17836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that the long-term development of premodern Dutch water management was partly shaped through a combination of institutional factors, and cultural norms and values. Departing from the institutional focus in the narrow sense that predominates in Milja van Tielhof’s Consensus and conflict, it makes the case that historians should take into account the influence of changes in the nature and ideology of the Dutch political elite between the late medieval ‘princely period’ and the early modern Dutch Republic. This is mainly demonstrated in reference to changes around the ideological precept of the Common Good (bonum commune). Using a combination of late medieval and early modern examples, the central contention is that the oligarchical elite that came to dominate both water management and the overarching political structure of the Dutch Republic, acquired a new notion of ‘shared interests’ due to their engagement on all political levels of the new state.","PeriodicalId":420105,"journal":{"name":"TSEG - The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Waterbeheer en ideologische belangen in de premoderne Nederlanden\",\"authors\":\"Jim van der Meulen\",\"doi\":\"10.52024/tseg.17836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article argues that the long-term development of premodern Dutch water management was partly shaped through a combination of institutional factors, and cultural norms and values. Departing from the institutional focus in the narrow sense that predominates in Milja van Tielhof’s Consensus and conflict, it makes the case that historians should take into account the influence of changes in the nature and ideology of the Dutch political elite between the late medieval ‘princely period’ and the early modern Dutch Republic. This is mainly demonstrated in reference to changes around the ideological precept of the Common Good (bonum commune). Using a combination of late medieval and early modern examples, the central contention is that the oligarchical elite that came to dominate both water management and the overarching political structure of the Dutch Republic, acquired a new notion of ‘shared interests’ due to their engagement on all political levels of the new state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":420105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TSEG - The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TSEG - The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52024/tseg.17836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TSEG - The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52024/tseg.17836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文认为,荷兰前现代水资源管理的长期发展在一定程度上是由制度因素、文化规范和价值观共同决定的。与米莉娅-范-蒂尔霍夫(Milja van Tielhof)的《共识与冲突》一书中狭义的制度重点不同,本文认为历史学家应考虑到中世纪晚期 "王室时期 "与近代早期荷兰共和国之间荷兰政治精英的性质和意识形态变化的影响。这主要体现在围绕 "共同利益"(bonum commune)这一意识形态戒律的变化上。结合中世纪晚期和近代早期的例子,核心论点是,寡头精英在荷兰共和国的水资源管理和总体政治结构中占据主导地位,由于他们参与了新国家的各个政治层面,他们获得了一种新的 "共同利益 "概念。
Waterbeheer en ideologische belangen in de premoderne Nederlanden
This article argues that the long-term development of premodern Dutch water management was partly shaped through a combination of institutional factors, and cultural norms and values. Departing from the institutional focus in the narrow sense that predominates in Milja van Tielhof’s Consensus and conflict, it makes the case that historians should take into account the influence of changes in the nature and ideology of the Dutch political elite between the late medieval ‘princely period’ and the early modern Dutch Republic. This is mainly demonstrated in reference to changes around the ideological precept of the Common Good (bonum commune). Using a combination of late medieval and early modern examples, the central contention is that the oligarchical elite that came to dominate both water management and the overarching political structure of the Dutch Republic, acquired a new notion of ‘shared interests’ due to their engagement on all political levels of the new state.