病毒引起病情恶化后治疗慢性阻塞性肺病的疗效

Q4 Medicine
L. Shpagina, O. Kotova, I. Shpagin, G. V. Kuznetsova, S. Karmanovskaya, L. Panacheva, E. Anikina
{"title":"病毒引起病情恶化后治疗慢性阻塞性肺病的疗效","authors":"L. Shpagina, O. Kotova, I. Shpagin, G. V. Kuznetsova, S. Karmanovskaya, L. Panacheva, E. Anikina","doi":"10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-6-739-749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Viral respiratory infection is one of the main etiologic factors for acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). The disease course after virus-associated AECOPD and the response to treatment have not been studied adequately.The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) of long-acting anticholinergic drugs (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) of adrenergic receptors/inhaled glucocorticosteroids (ICS) on COPD symptoms, lung function, exercise tolerance, and inflammatory activity compared with multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) after a virus-associated COPD exacerbation.Methods. This was an observational prospective cohort study of COPD patients (spirographус criterion) hospitalized for AECOPD with viral (n = 60) or viral-bacterial (n = 60) infection. The comparison group included patients with bacterial AECOPD (n = 60). Viral infection was diagnosed by PCR-RT of sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for RNAs of rhinovirus, RS virus, influenza A and B viruses, or SARS-CoV-2 virus. Bacterial infection was demonstrated by sputum purulence and/or procalcitonin test results and/or standard culture data. During AECOPD, blood cytokines were measured by ELISA. The patients were treated with SITT (investigational treatment) or MITT (comparison treatment) of LAMA/LABA/ICS in real-world clinical practice. The follow-up started 4 weeks after AECOPD regression and discharge from hospital.Results. After 52 weeks of treatment, FEV1 decline was smaller than in the SITT group. Differences from the MITT group were greater in patients with viral AECOPD (–69 (–75; –10) ml vs –75 (–78; –72) ml) or viral-bacterial AECOPD (–67.5 (–69; –37.25) ml vs –75.5 (–84; –70.25) ml). An increase in DLCO/Va, 6-minut walk test (6MWT) results, a decrease in bronchodilation coefficient, blood eosinophils and fibrinogen was seen only in subjects who received SITT and had viralor viral-bacterial AECOPD. A multiple regression model revealed a direct association between blood interleukin-5 and improvement in FEV1 (В = 0.848) and DLCO/Va (B=0.117) and a negative correlation with blood levels of amino-terminal propeptide of type-III procollagen and improvement in DLCO/Va (В = –0.021).Conclusion. SITT with LAMA/LABA/ICS was more effective in preventing FEV1 decline, increasing DLCO, 6MWT results, and decreasing airway inflammation in virus-associated or viral-bacterial AECOPD.","PeriodicalId":37383,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonologiya","volume":"19 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after virus-induced exacerbations\",\"authors\":\"L. Shpagina, O. Kotova, I. Shpagin, G. V. Kuznetsova, S. Karmanovskaya, L. Panacheva, E. Anikina\",\"doi\":\"10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-6-739-749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Viral respiratory infection is one of the main etiologic factors for acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). The disease course after virus-associated AECOPD and the response to treatment have not been studied adequately.The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) of long-acting anticholinergic drugs (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) of adrenergic receptors/inhaled glucocorticosteroids (ICS) on COPD symptoms, lung function, exercise tolerance, and inflammatory activity compared with multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) after a virus-associated COPD exacerbation.Methods. This was an observational prospective cohort study of COPD patients (spirographус criterion) hospitalized for AECOPD with viral (n = 60) or viral-bacterial (n = 60) infection. The comparison group included patients with bacterial AECOPD (n = 60). Viral infection was diagnosed by PCR-RT of sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for RNAs of rhinovirus, RS virus, influenza A and B viruses, or SARS-CoV-2 virus. Bacterial infection was demonstrated by sputum purulence and/or procalcitonin test results and/or standard culture data. During AECOPD, blood cytokines were measured by ELISA. The patients were treated with SITT (investigational treatment) or MITT (comparison treatment) of LAMA/LABA/ICS in real-world clinical practice. The follow-up started 4 weeks after AECOPD regression and discharge from hospital.Results. After 52 weeks of treatment, FEV1 decline was smaller than in the SITT group. Differences from the MITT group were greater in patients with viral AECOPD (–69 (–75; –10) ml vs –75 (–78; –72) ml) or viral-bacterial AECOPD (–67.5 (–69; –37.25) ml vs –75.5 (–84; –70.25) ml). An increase in DLCO/Va, 6-minut walk test (6MWT) results, a decrease in bronchodilation coefficient, blood eosinophils and fibrinogen was seen only in subjects who received SITT and had viralor viral-bacterial AECOPD. A multiple regression model revealed a direct association between blood interleukin-5 and improvement in FEV1 (В = 0.848) and DLCO/Va (B=0.117) and a negative correlation with blood levels of amino-terminal propeptide of type-III procollagen and improvement in DLCO/Va (В = –0.021).Conclusion. SITT with LAMA/LABA/ICS was more effective in preventing FEV1 decline, increasing DLCO, 6MWT results, and decreasing airway inflammation in virus-associated or viral-bacterial AECOPD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonologiya\",\"volume\":\"19 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonologiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-6-739-749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-6-739-749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

病毒性呼吸道感染是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)急性加重的主要病因之一。目前尚未对病毒相关 AECOPD 后的病程和治疗反应进行充分研究。该研究旨在评估病毒相关慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重后,长效抗胆碱能药物(LAMA)/肾上腺素能受体长效β2-激动剂(LABA)/吸入式糖皮质激素(ICS)的单吸入器三联疗法(SITT)与多吸入器三联疗法(MITT)相比,对慢性阻塞性肺疾病症状、肺功能、运动耐量和炎症活动的疗效。这是一项前瞻性队列观察研究,研究对象是因病毒感染(60 人)或病毒-细菌感染(60 人)引起的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)住院患者(spirographус标准)。对比组包括细菌性 AECOPD 患者(n = 60)。病毒感染是通过对痰液或支气管肺泡灌洗液进行鼻病毒、RS 病毒、甲型和乙型流感病毒或 SARS-CoV-2 病毒 RNA 的 PCR-RT 检测来诊断的。细菌感染通过痰脓和/或降钙素原检测结果和/或标准培养数据来证明。在 AECOPD 期间,通过 ELISA 检测血液细胞因子。在实际临床实践中,患者接受 LAMA/LABA/ICS 的 SITT(研究治疗)或 MITT(对比治疗)治疗。随访从AECOPD消退和出院后4周开始。治疗 52 周后,FEV1 下降幅度小于 SITT 组。病毒性 AECOPD 患者(-69 (-75; -10) ml vs -75 (-78; -72) ml)或病毒细菌性 AECOPD 患者(-67.5 (-69; -37.25) ml vs -75.5 (-84; -70.25) ml)与 MITT 组的差异更大。只有接受了 SITT 且患有病毒性或病毒性-细菌性 AECOPD 的受试者的 DLCO/Va、6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)结果、支气管舒张系数、血液嗜酸性粒细胞和纤维蛋白原才会增加。多元回归模型显示,血液白细胞介素-5与FEV1(В = 0.848)和DLCO/Va(B=0.117)的改善直接相关,而血液中III型胶原蛋白氨基末端肽水平与DLCO/Va的改善呈负相关(В = -0.021)。使用 LAMA/LABA/ICS 的 SITT 能更有效地防止 FEV1 下降、增加 DLCO 和 6MWT 结果,并减少病毒相关性或病毒细菌性 AECOPD 的气道炎症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after virus-induced exacerbations
Viral respiratory infection is one of the main etiologic factors for acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). The disease course after virus-associated AECOPD and the response to treatment have not been studied adequately.The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) of long-acting anticholinergic drugs (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) of adrenergic receptors/inhaled glucocorticosteroids (ICS) on COPD symptoms, lung function, exercise tolerance, and inflammatory activity compared with multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) after a virus-associated COPD exacerbation.Methods. This was an observational prospective cohort study of COPD patients (spirographус criterion) hospitalized for AECOPD with viral (n = 60) or viral-bacterial (n = 60) infection. The comparison group included patients with bacterial AECOPD (n = 60). Viral infection was diagnosed by PCR-RT of sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for RNAs of rhinovirus, RS virus, influenza A and B viruses, or SARS-CoV-2 virus. Bacterial infection was demonstrated by sputum purulence and/or procalcitonin test results and/or standard culture data. During AECOPD, blood cytokines were measured by ELISA. The patients were treated with SITT (investigational treatment) or MITT (comparison treatment) of LAMA/LABA/ICS in real-world clinical practice. The follow-up started 4 weeks after AECOPD regression and discharge from hospital.Results. After 52 weeks of treatment, FEV1 decline was smaller than in the SITT group. Differences from the MITT group were greater in patients with viral AECOPD (–69 (–75; –10) ml vs –75 (–78; –72) ml) or viral-bacterial AECOPD (–67.5 (–69; –37.25) ml vs –75.5 (–84; –70.25) ml). An increase in DLCO/Va, 6-minut walk test (6MWT) results, a decrease in bronchodilation coefficient, blood eosinophils and fibrinogen was seen only in subjects who received SITT and had viralor viral-bacterial AECOPD. A multiple regression model revealed a direct association between blood interleukin-5 and improvement in FEV1 (В = 0.848) and DLCO/Va (B=0.117) and a negative correlation with blood levels of amino-terminal propeptide of type-III procollagen and improvement in DLCO/Va (В = –0.021).Conclusion. SITT with LAMA/LABA/ICS was more effective in preventing FEV1 decline, increasing DLCO, 6MWT results, and decreasing airway inflammation in virus-associated or viral-bacterial AECOPD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonologiya
Pulmonologiya Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to state a scientific position of the Russian Respiratory Society (RRS) on diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases based on recent evidence-based clinical trial publications and international consensuses. The most important tasks of the journal are: -improvement proficiency qualifications of respiratory specialists; -education in pulmonology; -prompt publication of original studies on diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases; -sharing clinical experience and information about pulmonology service organization in different regions of Russia; -information on current protocols, standards and recommendations of international respiratory societies; -discussion and consequent publication Russian consensus documents and announcement of RRS activities; -publication and comments of regulatory documents of Russian Ministry of Health; -historical review of Russian pulmonology development. The scientific concept of the journal includes publication of current evidence-based studies on respiratory medicine and their discussion with the participation of Russian and foreign experts and development of national consensus documents on respiratory medicine. Russian and foreign respiratory specialists including pneumologists, TB specialists, thoracic surgeons, allergists, clinical immunologists, pediatricians, oncologists, physiologists, and therapeutists are invited to publish article in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信