{"title":"皮质类固醇治疗肉样瘤病的安全性","authors":"A. di Marco Berardino, F. Mei, L. Zuccatosta","doi":"10.3389/fdsfr.2023.1319931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic granulomatous disease of unknown origin and unpredictable cause, characterized by a dysregulated immune response. If histopathological hallmark is represented by the presence of non-caseating granulomas, clinical manifestations are variable and symptoms are not specific, and they depend on organs affected. Although thoracic involvement (lung and mediastinum) is the most common clinical manifestation, any organ can be virtually affected.Methods: This paper is structured as a narrative review. A literature search was performed in four electronic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Ovid Medline) and Google from inception until February 2023 for relevant studies, meta-analyses, and reviews on corticosteroids’ adverse events in sarcoidosis. English language only papers were included.Discussion: Although antimetabolites (such as Methotrexate) and immunosuppressant agents can be used as alternative therapy in refractory cases, traditionally systemic glucocorticoids represent the first choice for sarcoidosis treatment. However, their use is still debated, due to potential adverse effects, leading to a wide spectrum of complications particularly in patients who required long-term therapy. Hence, this article aims to provide a comprehensive updated review on the safety profile of glucocorticoid treatment in patients with sarcoidosis and their systemic effects.Conclusion: corticosteroids remain the first choice in Sarcoidosis, however, due to numerous side effects, dose and duration of treatment should be carefully adjusted and monitored by clinicians.","PeriodicalId":321587,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of corticosteroid therapy in sarcoidosis treatment\",\"authors\":\"A. di Marco Berardino, F. Mei, L. Zuccatosta\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdsfr.2023.1319931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic granulomatous disease of unknown origin and unpredictable cause, characterized by a dysregulated immune response. If histopathological hallmark is represented by the presence of non-caseating granulomas, clinical manifestations are variable and symptoms are not specific, and they depend on organs affected. Although thoracic involvement (lung and mediastinum) is the most common clinical manifestation, any organ can be virtually affected.Methods: This paper is structured as a narrative review. A literature search was performed in four electronic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Ovid Medline) and Google from inception until February 2023 for relevant studies, meta-analyses, and reviews on corticosteroids’ adverse events in sarcoidosis. English language only papers were included.Discussion: Although antimetabolites (such as Methotrexate) and immunosuppressant agents can be used as alternative therapy in refractory cases, traditionally systemic glucocorticoids represent the first choice for sarcoidosis treatment. However, their use is still debated, due to potential adverse effects, leading to a wide spectrum of complications particularly in patients who required long-term therapy. Hence, this article aims to provide a comprehensive updated review on the safety profile of glucocorticoid treatment in patients with sarcoidosis and their systemic effects.Conclusion: corticosteroids remain the first choice in Sarcoidosis, however, due to numerous side effects, dose and duration of treatment should be carefully adjusted and monitored by clinicians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdsfr.2023.1319931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdsfr.2023.1319931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言肉样瘤病是一种多系统肉芽肿性疾病,起因不明,病因难以预测,特点是免疫反应失调。如果说组织病理学的特征是出现非酪氨酸肉芽肿,那么临床表现则是多变的,症状没有特异性,而且取决于受累器官。虽然胸部受累(肺部和纵隔)是最常见的临床表现,但任何器官实际上都可能受累:本文为叙述性综述。从开始到 2023 年 2 月,我们在四个电子数据库(Pubmed、Cochrane、Scopus 和 Ovid Medline)和 Google 中进行了文献检索,以查找有关肉样瘤病中皮质类固醇激素不良事件的相关研究、荟萃分析和综述。仅纳入英文论文:尽管抗代谢药物(如甲氨蝶呤)和免疫抑制剂可作为难治性病例的替代疗法,但传统上全身用糖皮质激素是治疗肉样瘤病的首选。然而,由于其潜在的不良反应,尤其是在需要长期治疗的患者中,会导致广泛的并发症,因此对其使用仍存在争议。结论:皮质类固醇仍是肉样瘤病的首选药物,但由于副作用较多,临床医生应仔细调整和监测治疗的剂量和持续时间。
Safety of corticosteroid therapy in sarcoidosis treatment
Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic granulomatous disease of unknown origin and unpredictable cause, characterized by a dysregulated immune response. If histopathological hallmark is represented by the presence of non-caseating granulomas, clinical manifestations are variable and symptoms are not specific, and they depend on organs affected. Although thoracic involvement (lung and mediastinum) is the most common clinical manifestation, any organ can be virtually affected.Methods: This paper is structured as a narrative review. A literature search was performed in four electronic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Ovid Medline) and Google from inception until February 2023 for relevant studies, meta-analyses, and reviews on corticosteroids’ adverse events in sarcoidosis. English language only papers were included.Discussion: Although antimetabolites (such as Methotrexate) and immunosuppressant agents can be used as alternative therapy in refractory cases, traditionally systemic glucocorticoids represent the first choice for sarcoidosis treatment. However, their use is still debated, due to potential adverse effects, leading to a wide spectrum of complications particularly in patients who required long-term therapy. Hence, this article aims to provide a comprehensive updated review on the safety profile of glucocorticoid treatment in patients with sarcoidosis and their systemic effects.Conclusion: corticosteroids remain the first choice in Sarcoidosis, however, due to numerous side effects, dose and duration of treatment should be carefully adjusted and monitored by clinicians.