在学术环境中使用请求策略

Ahmed Hamed Al Rahbi, Osman Hassan Osman, Mahmoud Abuoaf
{"title":"在学术环境中使用请求策略","authors":"Ahmed Hamed Al Rahbi, Osman Hassan Osman, Mahmoud Abuoaf","doi":"10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.12.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study compares requests produced by Omani and American students. It examines the differences and similarities found in the types of requests produced in a Discourse Completion Test and the frequency of strategies employed for each speech act used. The results show that Omani students (non-native speakers) use fewer indirect request strategies in English than their American counterparts (native speakers). Linguistic differences are attributed to inadequate linguistic abilities among Omani students. This deficiency is anticipated to create problems such as the underuse of the past auxiliaries like could as opposed to present tense modals like can; the misuse of would; and the overuse of the lexical downgrader please in comparison to the underuse of external modifiers such as grounders, disarmers and sweeteners. Past auxiliaries were also found to be underused by Omanis due to the non-existence of these verbal forms in the Arabic language.","PeriodicalId":492462,"journal":{"name":"International journal of linguistics, literature and translation","volume":"13 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Request Strategies in an Academic Setting\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Hamed Al Rahbi, Osman Hassan Osman, Mahmoud Abuoaf\",\"doi\":\"10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.12.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study compares requests produced by Omani and American students. It examines the differences and similarities found in the types of requests produced in a Discourse Completion Test and the frequency of strategies employed for each speech act used. The results show that Omani students (non-native speakers) use fewer indirect request strategies in English than their American counterparts (native speakers). Linguistic differences are attributed to inadequate linguistic abilities among Omani students. This deficiency is anticipated to create problems such as the underuse of the past auxiliaries like could as opposed to present tense modals like can; the misuse of would; and the overuse of the lexical downgrader please in comparison to the underuse of external modifiers such as grounders, disarmers and sweeteners. Past auxiliaries were also found to be underused by Omanis due to the non-existence of these verbal forms in the Arabic language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":492462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of linguistics, literature and translation\",\"volume\":\"13 34\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of linguistics, literature and translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.12.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of linguistics, literature and translation","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.12.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究比较了阿曼学生和美国学生提出的请求。研究考察了在 "话语完成测试 "中请求类型的异同,以及每种言语行为所使用策略的频率。结果显示,阿曼学生(母语非英语)在英语中使用的间接请求策略少于美国学生(母语为英语)。语言差异归因于阿曼学生的语言能力不足。这种不足预计会造成一些问题,如过去助词(如 could)使用不足,而现在时态情态助词(如 can)使用不足;would 的误用;词性降级词 please 使用过多,而外部修饰词(如 grounders、disarmers 和 sweeteners)使用不足。由于阿拉伯语中不存在过去式助词,阿曼人也很少使用这些动词形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Use of Request Strategies in an Academic Setting
The study compares requests produced by Omani and American students. It examines the differences and similarities found in the types of requests produced in a Discourse Completion Test and the frequency of strategies employed for each speech act used. The results show that Omani students (non-native speakers) use fewer indirect request strategies in English than their American counterparts (native speakers). Linguistic differences are attributed to inadequate linguistic abilities among Omani students. This deficiency is anticipated to create problems such as the underuse of the past auxiliaries like could as opposed to present tense modals like can; the misuse of would; and the overuse of the lexical downgrader please in comparison to the underuse of external modifiers such as grounders, disarmers and sweeteners. Past auxiliaries were also found to be underused by Omanis due to the non-existence of these verbal forms in the Arabic language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信