袋鼠妈妈护理与口服蔗糖控制早产新生儿足跟刺痛:随机对照试验

Savitri G. Hugar, Kavitha Lakshmi S., Jagadish A. S., Premalatha R., R. B.
{"title":"袋鼠妈妈护理与口服蔗糖控制早产新生儿足跟刺痛:随机对照试验","authors":"Savitri G. Hugar, Kavitha Lakshmi S., Jagadish A. S., Premalatha R., R. B.","doi":"10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20233840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Preterm Neonates receiving intensive care are subjected to multiple painful procedures as part of their intensive care management. Pain leads to abnormal neurodevelopment, so it is extremely important to treat and reduce pain. Multiple studies have shown to be beneficial in pain control. Objective was to compare the efficacy of Kangaroo Mother Care with oral sucrose for pain management in premature neonates on heel prick.\nMethods: A total of 100 preterm neonates (28-36 weeks) who fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Randomization was done and fifty participants per study arm were randomly assigned to the KMC and oral sucrose group. Preterm babies in the KMC group were given KMC for 15 minutes uninterrupted prior to heel prick. In oral sucrose group, two minutes prior to the procedure, baby received 0.5ml of 24% oral sucrose solution by syringe onto the tongue. The remainder of the total recommended dose was given as needed in small increments during the procedure. Assessment of pain done using PIPP. The post-procedural PIPP score was compared between KMC and oral sucrose groups.\nResults: Analysis of 100 preterm neonates (50 KMC and 50 oral sucrose) were done. Baseline variables were mean±SD gestational age 34.25±1.42 weeks, age 7.15±4.9 days, birth weight 1.72±0.32 kg. Post procedural PIPP score was less in KMC 5.16±1.58 group compared to oral sucrose 5.48±1.81 group but could not achieve statistical significance p=0.35, 95% CI=−0.99,0.35.\nConclusions: KMC and oral sucrose are equally effective for pain management in premature neonates on heel prick but KMC is considered better compared to oral sucrose.","PeriodicalId":13870,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kangaroo mother care verses oral sucrose for pain control in premature neonates on heel prick: a randomized control trial\",\"authors\":\"Savitri G. Hugar, Kavitha Lakshmi S., Jagadish A. S., Premalatha R., R. B.\",\"doi\":\"10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20233840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Preterm Neonates receiving intensive care are subjected to multiple painful procedures as part of their intensive care management. Pain leads to abnormal neurodevelopment, so it is extremely important to treat and reduce pain. Multiple studies have shown to be beneficial in pain control. Objective was to compare the efficacy of Kangaroo Mother Care with oral sucrose for pain management in premature neonates on heel prick.\\nMethods: A total of 100 preterm neonates (28-36 weeks) who fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Randomization was done and fifty participants per study arm were randomly assigned to the KMC and oral sucrose group. Preterm babies in the KMC group were given KMC for 15 minutes uninterrupted prior to heel prick. In oral sucrose group, two minutes prior to the procedure, baby received 0.5ml of 24% oral sucrose solution by syringe onto the tongue. The remainder of the total recommended dose was given as needed in small increments during the procedure. Assessment of pain done using PIPP. The post-procedural PIPP score was compared between KMC and oral sucrose groups.\\nResults: Analysis of 100 preterm neonates (50 KMC and 50 oral sucrose) were done. Baseline variables were mean±SD gestational age 34.25±1.42 weeks, age 7.15±4.9 days, birth weight 1.72±0.32 kg. Post procedural PIPP score was less in KMC 5.16±1.58 group compared to oral sucrose 5.48±1.81 group but could not achieve statistical significance p=0.35, 95% CI=−0.99,0.35.\\nConclusions: KMC and oral sucrose are equally effective for pain management in premature neonates on heel prick but KMC is considered better compared to oral sucrose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20233840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20233840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接受重症监护的早产新生儿在重症监护过程中会遭受多种疼痛。疼痛会导致神经发育异常,因此治疗和减轻疼痛极为重要。多项研究表明,镇痛药对控制疼痛有益。目的是比较袋鼠妈妈护理和口服蔗糖对早产新生儿足跟刺痛治疗的疗效:研究共招募了 100 名符合纳入和排除标准的早产新生儿(28-36 周)。研究采用随机分配法,每组 50 名参与者被随机分配到 KMC 组和口服蔗糖组。KMC组的早产儿在足跟点刺前不间断服用KMC 15分钟。口服蔗糖组则在刺跟前两分钟,用注射器将 0.5 毫升 24% 的蔗糖口服液注入婴儿舌头。总推荐剂量的其余部分则在手术过程中根据需要小剂量给药。使用 PIPP 评估疼痛。比较了 KMC 组和口服蔗糖组的术后 PIPP 评分:结果:对 100 名早产新生儿(50 名 KMC 组和 50 名口服蔗糖组)进行了分析。基线变量为平均(±SD)胎龄(34.25±1.42 周)、胎龄(7.15±4.9 天)、出生体重(1.72±0.32 千克)。与口服蔗糖 5.48±1.81 组相比,KMC 5.16±1.58 组的术后 PIPP 评分较低,但未达到统计学意义 p=0.35,95% CI=-0.99,0.35:KMC 和口服蔗糖对早产新生儿足跟刺痛的止痛效果相同,但 KMC 的止痛效果优于口服蔗糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kangaroo mother care verses oral sucrose for pain control in premature neonates on heel prick: a randomized control trial
Background: Preterm Neonates receiving intensive care are subjected to multiple painful procedures as part of their intensive care management. Pain leads to abnormal neurodevelopment, so it is extremely important to treat and reduce pain. Multiple studies have shown to be beneficial in pain control. Objective was to compare the efficacy of Kangaroo Mother Care with oral sucrose for pain management in premature neonates on heel prick. Methods: A total of 100 preterm neonates (28-36 weeks) who fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Randomization was done and fifty participants per study arm were randomly assigned to the KMC and oral sucrose group. Preterm babies in the KMC group were given KMC for 15 minutes uninterrupted prior to heel prick. In oral sucrose group, two minutes prior to the procedure, baby received 0.5ml of 24% oral sucrose solution by syringe onto the tongue. The remainder of the total recommended dose was given as needed in small increments during the procedure. Assessment of pain done using PIPP. The post-procedural PIPP score was compared between KMC and oral sucrose groups. Results: Analysis of 100 preterm neonates (50 KMC and 50 oral sucrose) were done. Baseline variables were mean±SD gestational age 34.25±1.42 weeks, age 7.15±4.9 days, birth weight 1.72±0.32 kg. Post procedural PIPP score was less in KMC 5.16±1.58 group compared to oral sucrose 5.48±1.81 group but could not achieve statistical significance p=0.35, 95% CI=−0.99,0.35. Conclusions: KMC and oral sucrose are equally effective for pain management in premature neonates on heel prick but KMC is considered better compared to oral sucrose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信