共同生产的定义：规划文献综述

IF 4 2区经济学 Q1 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

Journal of Planning Literature Pub Date : 2023-12-17 DOI:10.1177/08854122231219919

Dahae Lee, Patricia Feiertag, Lena Unger

{"title":"共同生产的定义：规划文献综述","authors":"Dahae Lee, Patricia Feiertag, Lena Unger","doi":"10.1177/08854122231219919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Co-production is a concept that is becoming increasingly popular across various fields including planning. This article reviews planning literature on co-production and reveals that the term has not been well defined. The existing definitions are inconsistent and ambiguous, requiring more conceptual clarity to avoid contention. Based on the systematic literature review, and aided by bibliometric analysis, the article identifies seven dimensions within the current definitions of co-production: (1) actor, (2) reason, (3) input, (4) output, (5) phase, (6) means, and (7) context. This article concludes by proposing a conceptual and analytical framework for defining co-production in planning theory and practice.","PeriodicalId":54207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Planning Literature","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining Co-Production: A Review of the Planning Literature\",\"authors\":\"Dahae Lee, Patricia Feiertag, Lena Unger\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08854122231219919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Co-production is a concept that is becoming increasingly popular across various fields including planning. This article reviews planning literature on co-production and reveals that the term has not been well defined. The existing definitions are inconsistent and ambiguous, requiring more conceptual clarity to avoid contention. Based on the systematic literature review, and aided by bibliometric analysis, the article identifies seven dimensions within the current definitions of co-production: (1) actor, (2) reason, (3) input, (4) output, (5) phase, (6) means, and (7) context. This article concludes by proposing a conceptual and analytical framework for defining co-production in planning theory and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Planning Literature\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Planning Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122231219919\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Planning Literature","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122231219919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

共同生产是一个在包括规划在内的各个领域日益流行的概念。本文回顾了有关共同制作的规划文献，发现这一术语尚未得到很好的定义。现有的定义不一致且含糊不清，需要在概念上更加清晰，以避免争论。在系统性文献综述的基础上，通过文献计量分析，文章在共同生产的现有定义中确定了七个维度：（1）行为者，（2）原因，（3）投入，（4）产出，（5）阶段，（6）手段，以及（7）背景。最后，本文提出了在规划理论和实践中定义共同生产的概念和分析框架。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Defining Co-Production: A Review of the Planning Literature

Co-production is a concept that is becoming increasingly popular across various fields including planning. This article reviews planning literature on co-production and reveals that the term has not been well defined. The existing definitions are inconsistent and ambiguous, requiring more conceptual clarity to avoid contention. Based on the systematic literature review, and aided by bibliometric analysis, the article identifies seven dimensions within the current definitions of co-production: (1) actor, (2) reason, (3) input, (4) output, (5) phase, (6) means, and (7) context. This article concludes by proposing a conceptual and analytical framework for defining co-production in planning theory and practice.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Planning Literature Multiple-

CiteScore

10.90

自引率

2.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE publishes review articles and abstracts of recent literature in city and regional planning and design. A typical issue contains one to three refereed literature reviews; a Council of Planning Librarians (CPL) Bibliography; several hundred abstracts of recent journal articles and dissertations; and several hundred bibliographic listings. JPL aims to give the reader an understanding of the state of knowledge of the field for use in research or professional practice.