在 "合一运动 "先知以赛亚书阅读方法的世界中,以赛亚书 30:1-17(TM)的注释-神学阅读

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Crkva u Svijetu Pub Date : 2023-12-18 DOI:10.34075/cs.58.4.8
Ivan Benaković
{"title":"在 \"合一运动 \"先知以赛亚书阅读方法的世界中,以赛亚书 30:1-17(TM)的注释-神学阅读","authors":"Ivan Benaković","doi":"10.34075/cs.58.4.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Book of Isaiah has been truly complex for bible researchers for years. The primary difficulty arises from the poetic way of expressing the author, and this is of course associated with the difficulty of connecting different historical epochs described by the Book of Isaiah in its completeness. Lately, this book has been approached in a unitary way. This will say that it is sought to be read in its wholeness of parts, rather than dividing it as it has long been a trend, into three parts: Is 1-39; 40-55; 56-66. This so-called “unity movement” in research on the Book of Isaiah shows us how the Book can nevertheless be approached whole. Therefore, in this paper, we will seek to analyze the text of Is 30:1-17 (TM) in light of the so-called “unity movement” approach to the Book of Isaiah. It should be said however that the methodological path of this work will be primarily the so-called “close reading” of the text and then also will be given some possible intertextual echoes which link Is 30, 1-17 with other parts of the Book of Isaiah. At the end author will also try to depict a possible historical and theological message of the same biblical text.","PeriodicalId":53546,"journal":{"name":"Crkva u Svijetu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Egzegetsko-teološko čitanje teksta Iz 30, 1-17 (TM) u svjetlu „unity movement“ pristupa za čitanje Knjige proroka Izaije\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Benaković\",\"doi\":\"10.34075/cs.58.4.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Book of Isaiah has been truly complex for bible researchers for years. The primary difficulty arises from the poetic way of expressing the author, and this is of course associated with the difficulty of connecting different historical epochs described by the Book of Isaiah in its completeness. Lately, this book has been approached in a unitary way. This will say that it is sought to be read in its wholeness of parts, rather than dividing it as it has long been a trend, into three parts: Is 1-39; 40-55; 56-66. This so-called “unity movement” in research on the Book of Isaiah shows us how the Book can nevertheless be approached whole. Therefore, in this paper, we will seek to analyze the text of Is 30:1-17 (TM) in light of the so-called “unity movement” approach to the Book of Isaiah. It should be said however that the methodological path of this work will be primarily the so-called “close reading” of the text and then also will be given some possible intertextual echoes which link Is 30, 1-17 with other parts of the Book of Isaiah. At the end author will also try to depict a possible historical and theological message of the same biblical text.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crkva u Svijetu\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crkva u Svijetu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34075/cs.58.4.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crkva u Svijetu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34075/cs.58.4.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多年来,《以赛亚书》对圣经研究者来说确实是一个复杂的问题。主要的困难来自于作者诗意的表达方式,当然这也与难以将《以赛亚书》所描述的不同历史时代完整地联系起来有关。最近,人们以一种统一的方式来研究这本书。这就是说,人们试图从整体上解读《以赛亚书》,而不是像长期以来的趋势那样,将其分为三个部分:Is 1-39;40-55;56-66。以赛亚书研究中的这一所谓 "统一运动 "向我们展示了《以赛亚书》如何能够被完整地解读。因此,在本文中,我们将根据对《以赛亚书》的所谓 "合一运动 "方法来分析《以赛亚书》30:1-17(TM)的经文。但应该指出的是,这项工作的方法论路径主要是所谓的 "细读 "文本,然后还将给出一些可能的互文呼应,将以赛亚书第 30 章第 1-17 节与其他部分联系起来。最后,作者还将尝试描绘同一圣经文本可能传达的历史和神学信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Egzegetsko-teološko čitanje teksta Iz 30, 1-17 (TM) u svjetlu „unity movement“ pristupa za čitanje Knjige proroka Izaije
The Book of Isaiah has been truly complex for bible researchers for years. The primary difficulty arises from the poetic way of expressing the author, and this is of course associated with the difficulty of connecting different historical epochs described by the Book of Isaiah in its completeness. Lately, this book has been approached in a unitary way. This will say that it is sought to be read in its wholeness of parts, rather than dividing it as it has long been a trend, into three parts: Is 1-39; 40-55; 56-66. This so-called “unity movement” in research on the Book of Isaiah shows us how the Book can nevertheless be approached whole. Therefore, in this paper, we will seek to analyze the text of Is 30:1-17 (TM) in light of the so-called “unity movement” approach to the Book of Isaiah. It should be said however that the methodological path of this work will be primarily the so-called “close reading” of the text and then also will be given some possible intertextual echoes which link Is 30, 1-17 with other parts of the Book of Isaiah. At the end author will also try to depict a possible historical and theological message of the same biblical text.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crkva u Svijetu
Crkva u Svijetu Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信