用 RGC 方法比较分析国有银行和私营银行的健康水平

Lulu Amalia Nusron
{"title":"用 RGC 方法比较分析国有银行和私营银行的健康水平","authors":"Lulu Amalia Nusron","doi":"10.33369/fairness.v13i2.31891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aims to determine the assessment of the soundness level of state-owned banks and private banks book IV using the RGEC method during 2015-2019. The population of this research is all banks registered with the Financial Services Authority. This research is descriptive with a quantitative approach. The sample performance in this research used purposive sampling technique with certain criteria. The criteria are 1) The sample conventional commercial banks & state-owned enterprises are those included in book IV in 2015 - 2019. 2) National private banks & state-owned enterprises with core capital of more than 30 trillion & included in book IV during 2015-2019. 3) State-owned banks and conventional banks with a ratio of large and small core capital that are proportional to the value of the analysis method used is the different test with the independent sample test. The results of this research on the health assessment of the bank show that the NPL, LDR and ROA ratios are significant differences between private banks IV and state-owned banks, while for GCG, CAR and NIM there is no significant difference between the soundness level of state- owned banks and private banks BUKU IV.","PeriodicalId":402161,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL FAIRNESS","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK BUMN DAN BANK SWASTA DENGAN METODE RGEC\",\"authors\":\"Lulu Amalia Nusron\",\"doi\":\"10.33369/fairness.v13i2.31891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research aims to determine the assessment of the soundness level of state-owned banks and private banks book IV using the RGEC method during 2015-2019. The population of this research is all banks registered with the Financial Services Authority. This research is descriptive with a quantitative approach. The sample performance in this research used purposive sampling technique with certain criteria. The criteria are 1) The sample conventional commercial banks & state-owned enterprises are those included in book IV in 2015 - 2019. 2) National private banks & state-owned enterprises with core capital of more than 30 trillion & included in book IV during 2015-2019. 3) State-owned banks and conventional banks with a ratio of large and small core capital that are proportional to the value of the analysis method used is the different test with the independent sample test. The results of this research on the health assessment of the bank show that the NPL, LDR and ROA ratios are significant differences between private banks IV and state-owned banks, while for GCG, CAR and NIM there is no significant difference between the soundness level of state- owned banks and private banks BUKU IV.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL FAIRNESS\",\"volume\":\" 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL FAIRNESS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v13i2.31891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL FAIRNESS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v13i2.31891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定 2015-2019 年期间使用 RGEC 方法对国有银行和私营银行账簿 IV 的稳健性水平进行的评估。本研究的研究对象是在金融服务管理局注册的所有银行。本研究为描述性研究,采用定量方法。本研究的样本表现采用了具有一定标准的目的性抽样技术。这些标准是:1)样本传统商业银行和国有企业是那些在 2015 - 2019 年列入第四册的银行和企业。2) 核心资本超过 30 万亿且在 2015-2019 年期间被纳入第四册的全国性民营银行和国有企业。3)国有银行与传统银行的核心资本大小比例值成正比,所采用的分析方法是与独立样本检验不同的检验方法。本次对银行健康评估的研究结果表明,NPL、LDR和ROA比率在民营银行IV和国有银行之间存在显著差异,而GCG、CAR和NIM在国有银行和民营银行BUKU IV的稳健性水平之间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK BUMN DAN BANK SWASTA DENGAN METODE RGEC
The research aims to determine the assessment of the soundness level of state-owned banks and private banks book IV using the RGEC method during 2015-2019. The population of this research is all banks registered with the Financial Services Authority. This research is descriptive with a quantitative approach. The sample performance in this research used purposive sampling technique with certain criteria. The criteria are 1) The sample conventional commercial banks & state-owned enterprises are those included in book IV in 2015 - 2019. 2) National private banks & state-owned enterprises with core capital of more than 30 trillion & included in book IV during 2015-2019. 3) State-owned banks and conventional banks with a ratio of large and small core capital that are proportional to the value of the analysis method used is the different test with the independent sample test. The results of this research on the health assessment of the bank show that the NPL, LDR and ROA ratios are significant differences between private banks IV and state-owned banks, while for GCG, CAR and NIM there is no significant difference between the soundness level of state- owned banks and private banks BUKU IV.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信