检测药物不良事件的自然语言处理:系统综述协议

Imane Guellil, Jinge Wu, Aryo Pradipta Gema, Farah Francis, Yousra Berrachedi, Nidhaleddine Chenni, Richard Tobin, Clare Llewellyn, Stella Arakelyan, Honghan Wu, Bruce Guthrie, Beatrice Alex
{"title":"检测药物不良事件的自然语言处理:系统综述协议","authors":"Imane Guellil, Jinge Wu, Aryo Pradipta Gema, Farah Francis, Yousra Berrachedi, Nidhaleddine Chenni, Richard Tobin, Clare Llewellyn, Stella Arakelyan, Honghan Wu, Bruce Guthrie, Beatrice Alex","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13504.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Detecting Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) is an emerging research area, attracting great interest in the research community. Better anticipatory management of predisposing factors has considerable potential to improve outcomes. Automatic extraction of ADEs using Natural Language Processing (NLP) has a great potential to significantly facilitate efficient and effective distillation of such knowledge, to better understand and predict risk of adverse events. Methods This systematic review follows the six-stage including the literature from 6 databases (Embase, Medline, Web Of Science, ACM Guide to Computing Literature, IEEE Digital Library and Scopus). Following the title, abstract and full-text screenings, characteristics and main findings of the included studies and resources will be tabulated and summarized. The risk of bias and reporting quality was assessed using the PROBAST tool 1 . Results We developed our search strategy and collected all relevant publications. As of October 2023, we have completed the first two stages of the systematic review. We identified 178 studies for inclusion through the academic literature search (where data was extracted from 118 papers). Further refinement of the eligibility criteria and data extraction has been ongoing since August 2022. Conclusion In this systematic review, we will identify and consolidate information and evidence related to the use and effectiveness of existing NLP approaches and tools for automatically detecting ADEs from free text (discharge summaries, General Practitioner notes, social media, etc.). Our findings will improve the understanding of the current landscape of the use of NLP for extracting ADEs. It will lead to better anticipatory management of predisposing factors with the potential to improve outcomes considerably. Our results will also be valuable both to NLP researchers developing methods to extract ADEs and to translational/clinical researchers who use NLP for this purpose and in healthcare in general.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"122 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural language processing for detecting adverse drug events: A systematic review protocol\",\"authors\":\"Imane Guellil, Jinge Wu, Aryo Pradipta Gema, Farah Francis, Yousra Berrachedi, Nidhaleddine Chenni, Richard Tobin, Clare Llewellyn, Stella Arakelyan, Honghan Wu, Bruce Guthrie, Beatrice Alex\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/nihropenres.13504.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Detecting Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) is an emerging research area, attracting great interest in the research community. Better anticipatory management of predisposing factors has considerable potential to improve outcomes. Automatic extraction of ADEs using Natural Language Processing (NLP) has a great potential to significantly facilitate efficient and effective distillation of such knowledge, to better understand and predict risk of adverse events. Methods This systematic review follows the six-stage including the literature from 6 databases (Embase, Medline, Web Of Science, ACM Guide to Computing Literature, IEEE Digital Library and Scopus). Following the title, abstract and full-text screenings, characteristics and main findings of the included studies and resources will be tabulated and summarized. The risk of bias and reporting quality was assessed using the PROBAST tool 1 . Results We developed our search strategy and collected all relevant publications. As of October 2023, we have completed the first two stages of the systematic review. We identified 178 studies for inclusion through the academic literature search (where data was extracted from 118 papers). Further refinement of the eligibility criteria and data extraction has been ongoing since August 2022. Conclusion In this systematic review, we will identify and consolidate information and evidence related to the use and effectiveness of existing NLP approaches and tools for automatically detecting ADEs from free text (discharge summaries, General Practitioner notes, social media, etc.). Our findings will improve the understanding of the current landscape of the use of NLP for extracting ADEs. It will lead to better anticipatory management of predisposing factors with the potential to improve outcomes considerably. Our results will also be valuable both to NLP researchers developing methods to extract ADEs and to translational/clinical researchers who use NLP for this purpose and in healthcare in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NIHR open research\",\"volume\":\"122 30\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NIHR open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13504.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13504.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景检测药物不良事件(ADEs)是一个新兴的研究领域,引起了研究界的极大兴趣。对药物不良反应的诱发因素进行更好的预测管理,对于改善治疗效果具有相当大的潜力。使用自然语言处理(NLP)自动提取 ADEs 有很大的潜力,可极大地促进高效、有效地提炼此类知识,从而更好地了解和预测不良事件的风险。方法 本系统性综述分为六个阶段,包括 6 个数据库(Embase、Medline、Web Of Science、ACM Guide to Computing Literature、IEEE Digital Library 和 Scopus)中的文献。在对标题、摘要和全文进行筛选后,将对纳入研究和资源的特点和主要发现进行列表和总结。使用 PROBAST 工具 1 对偏倚风险和报告质量进行了评估。结果 我们制定了检索策略并收集了所有相关出版物。截至 2023 年 10 月,我们已经完成了系统综述的前两个阶段。通过学术文献检索,我们确定了 178 项可纳入的研究(从 118 篇论文中提取了数据)。自 2022 年 8 月以来,我们一直在进一步完善资格标准和数据提取工作。结论 在本系统综述中,我们将确定并整合与现有 NLP 方法和工具的使用和有效性相关的信息和证据,以便从自由文本(出院摘要、全科医生笔记、社交媒体等)中自动检测 ADE。我们的研究结果将有助于人们更好地了解目前使用 NLP 提取 ADE 的情况。这将有助于对易感因素进行更好的预见性管理,并有可能大大改善治疗效果。我们的研究成果对于开发提取 ADE 的方法的 NLP 研究人员,以及将 NLP 用于此目的和一般医疗保健的转化/临床研究人员来说,都非常有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Natural language processing for detecting adverse drug events: A systematic review protocol
Background Detecting Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) is an emerging research area, attracting great interest in the research community. Better anticipatory management of predisposing factors has considerable potential to improve outcomes. Automatic extraction of ADEs using Natural Language Processing (NLP) has a great potential to significantly facilitate efficient and effective distillation of such knowledge, to better understand and predict risk of adverse events. Methods This systematic review follows the six-stage including the literature from 6 databases (Embase, Medline, Web Of Science, ACM Guide to Computing Literature, IEEE Digital Library and Scopus). Following the title, abstract and full-text screenings, characteristics and main findings of the included studies and resources will be tabulated and summarized. The risk of bias and reporting quality was assessed using the PROBAST tool 1 . Results We developed our search strategy and collected all relevant publications. As of October 2023, we have completed the first two stages of the systematic review. We identified 178 studies for inclusion through the academic literature search (where data was extracted from 118 papers). Further refinement of the eligibility criteria and data extraction has been ongoing since August 2022. Conclusion In this systematic review, we will identify and consolidate information and evidence related to the use and effectiveness of existing NLP approaches and tools for automatically detecting ADEs from free text (discharge summaries, General Practitioner notes, social media, etc.). Our findings will improve the understanding of the current landscape of the use of NLP for extracting ADEs. It will lead to better anticipatory management of predisposing factors with the potential to improve outcomes considerably. Our results will also be valuable both to NLP researchers developing methods to extract ADEs and to translational/clinical researchers who use NLP for this purpose and in healthcare in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信