在有痴呆症患者参与的互动过程中,促进或阻碍包容性的对话方式

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Trini Stickle
{"title":"在有痴呆症患者参与的互动过程中,促进或阻碍包容性的对话方式","authors":"Trini Stickle","doi":"10.1075/ps.23052.sti","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article highlights co-participant strategies during conversations involving participants diagnosed with dementia that encourage continued, productive interaction fostering inclusivity. The conversation excerpts illustrate positive results when non-impaired co-participants respond to impaired syntax as though it makes sense or as if it completes a coherent syntactic–semantic action. Helpful co-participants yield control of conversations, rather than issuing corrections; demonstrate an acuity for when to divert topics; and acknowledge their co-participants’ concerns. In contrast, non-inclusive strategies include overuse of questions, overcorrecting, minimizing dementia symptoms, or dismissing co-participants’ concerns, which frequently result in persons with dementia resisting or withdrawing from conversations, often accompanied by displays of anger. The goal is to raise awareness of strategies which promise an increase in and longer duration of interactions, decrease loneliness, and increase health and emotional outcomes of older persons.","PeriodicalId":44036,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics and Society","volume":"82 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversation practices that foster or hinder inclusivity during interactions involving persons with dementia\",\"authors\":\"Trini Stickle\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ps.23052.sti\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis article highlights co-participant strategies during conversations involving participants diagnosed with dementia that encourage continued, productive interaction fostering inclusivity. The conversation excerpts illustrate positive results when non-impaired co-participants respond to impaired syntax as though it makes sense or as if it completes a coherent syntactic–semantic action. Helpful co-participants yield control of conversations, rather than issuing corrections; demonstrate an acuity for when to divert topics; and acknowledge their co-participants’ concerns. In contrast, non-inclusive strategies include overuse of questions, overcorrecting, minimizing dementia symptoms, or dismissing co-participants’ concerns, which frequently result in persons with dementia resisting or withdrawing from conversations, often accompanied by displays of anger. The goal is to raise awareness of strategies which promise an increase in and longer duration of interactions, decrease loneliness, and increase health and emotional outcomes of older persons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatics and Society\",\"volume\":\"82 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatics and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.23052.sti\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.23052.sti","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重点介绍了在有痴呆症患者参与的对话中,共同参与者所采取的策略,这些策略鼓励了持续、富有成效的互动,促进了包容性。对话摘录说明,当非障碍共同参与者对有障碍的句法做出反应时,会产生积极的效果,就好像它是有意义的,或者它完成了一个连贯的句法-语义动作。乐于助人的共同参与者会控制对话,而不是进行纠正;他们会敏锐地发现何时转移话题;他们会承认共同参与者的担忧。与此相反,非包容性策略包括过度使用问题、过度纠正、将痴呆症症状最小化或驳回共同参与者的担忧,这常常会导致痴呆症患者抵制或退出谈话,并经常伴有愤怒的表现。我们的目标是提高人们对各种策略的认识,这些策略有望增加互动次数,延长互动时间,减少孤独感,并改善老年人的健康和情感状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conversation practices that foster or hinder inclusivity during interactions involving persons with dementia
This article highlights co-participant strategies during conversations involving participants diagnosed with dementia that encourage continued, productive interaction fostering inclusivity. The conversation excerpts illustrate positive results when non-impaired co-participants respond to impaired syntax as though it makes sense or as if it completes a coherent syntactic–semantic action. Helpful co-participants yield control of conversations, rather than issuing corrections; demonstrate an acuity for when to divert topics; and acknowledge their co-participants’ concerns. In contrast, non-inclusive strategies include overuse of questions, overcorrecting, minimizing dementia symptoms, or dismissing co-participants’ concerns, which frequently result in persons with dementia resisting or withdrawing from conversations, often accompanied by displays of anger. The goal is to raise awareness of strategies which promise an increase in and longer duration of interactions, decrease loneliness, and increase health and emotional outcomes of older persons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信