回归自然分娩:我们的助产士准备好了吗?土耳其西部的横断面研究

N. Balkaya, Keziban Amanak, Hale UYAR HAZAR
{"title":"回归自然分娩:我们的助产士准备好了吗?土耳其西部的横断面研究","authors":"N. Balkaya, Keziban Amanak, Hale UYAR HAZAR","doi":"10.17339/ejovoc.1392416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to report current knowledge and opinions of midwives regarding natural birth. Cross-sectional data were collected from 213 midwives. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test. Midwives’ mean age and work experience were 37.85±5.81 and 18.36±6.49 years, respectively. Midwives assisted in normal births (65.3%), C-sections (33.3%) and natural births (1.6%), and indicated that the C-section is the riskiest birth (72.3%). Only 35% of midwives had received childbirth preparation classes training. Many midwives did not know about natural birth at all (21.2%) or about preparations for natural birth (41.7%). The midwives supported normal and natural births and believed such births to be healthy, but were not knowledgeable regarding natural birth and preparations for natural birth, and continued conventional birth practices.","PeriodicalId":273556,"journal":{"name":"EJOVOC Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges","volume":"49 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RETURN TO NATURAL CHILDBIRTH: ARE OUR MIDWIVES READY FOR THIS? A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY FROM WESTERN TURKEY\",\"authors\":\"N. Balkaya, Keziban Amanak, Hale UYAR HAZAR\",\"doi\":\"10.17339/ejovoc.1392416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to report current knowledge and opinions of midwives regarding natural birth. Cross-sectional data were collected from 213 midwives. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test. Midwives’ mean age and work experience were 37.85±5.81 and 18.36±6.49 years, respectively. Midwives assisted in normal births (65.3%), C-sections (33.3%) and natural births (1.6%), and indicated that the C-section is the riskiest birth (72.3%). Only 35% of midwives had received childbirth preparation classes training. Many midwives did not know about natural birth at all (21.2%) or about preparations for natural birth (41.7%). The midwives supported normal and natural births and believed such births to be healthy, but were not knowledgeable regarding natural birth and preparations for natural birth, and continued conventional birth practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJOVOC Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJOVOC Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17339/ejovoc.1392416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJOVOC Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17339/ejovoc.1392416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在报告助产士目前对自然分娩的认识和看法。研究收集了 213 名助产士的横断面数据。数据采用描述性统计和卡方检验进行分析。助产士的平均年龄(37.85±5.81)岁,平均工作经验(18.36±6.49)年。助产士协助过顺产(65.3%)、剖腹产(33.3%)和自然分娩(1.6%),并表示剖腹产是风险最大的分娩(72.3%)。只有 35% 的助产士接受过分娩准备课程培训。许多助产士根本不了解自然分娩(21.2%)或自然分娩的准备工作(41.7%)。助产士支持正常和自然分娩,并认为这种分娩是健康的,但对自然分娩和自然分娩的准备工作缺乏了解,并继续采用传统的分娩方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RETURN TO NATURAL CHILDBIRTH: ARE OUR MIDWIVES READY FOR THIS? A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY FROM WESTERN TURKEY
This study aimed to report current knowledge and opinions of midwives regarding natural birth. Cross-sectional data were collected from 213 midwives. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test. Midwives’ mean age and work experience were 37.85±5.81 and 18.36±6.49 years, respectively. Midwives assisted in normal births (65.3%), C-sections (33.3%) and natural births (1.6%), and indicated that the C-section is the riskiest birth (72.3%). Only 35% of midwives had received childbirth preparation classes training. Many midwives did not know about natural birth at all (21.2%) or about preparations for natural birth (41.7%). The midwives supported normal and natural births and believed such births to be healthy, but were not knowledgeable regarding natural birth and preparations for natural birth, and continued conventional birth practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信