{"title":"公共秩序积极条款是保护国家宪法重要价值的基础","authors":"A. Shulakov","doi":"10.17803/2311-5998.2023.109.9.128-137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article notes that the purpose and mechanism of protection of public order in private international law can be understood only at the origins of the rationale for this protection, — in the doctrine of F. K. Savigny. The reasons for the formulation of F. K. Savigny only two exceptions to the displacement of foreign laws by local law, and the characteristics of fixing these rules in Art. 30 of the Introductory Law to the GGU. Analyzed are attempts to misinterpret the doctrine of F. K. Savigny after the adoption of the Rome Convention “On the law applicable to contractual obligations” (1980) and the Decision of the EU Court (2016), which gave a final assessment of these attempts. The influence of the Dutch school on modern international private law in Russia is noted. The consolidation of super-imperative norms in the legislation of Russia and the Netherlands is investigated. It has been established that the first group of norms of direct application of Art. 1992 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the super-imperative nature of which in private cross-border legal relations is directly indicated by the legislator, has, in accordance with the theory of private international law, not a material, but a conflict character. The definition of super-imperative norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation, which ensure the protection of the constitutionally significant values of the state, is given.","PeriodicalId":238867,"journal":{"name":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","volume":"69 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positive Clause on Public Order is the Basis for the Protection of Constitutionally Significant Values of the State\",\"authors\":\"A. Shulakov\",\"doi\":\"10.17803/2311-5998.2023.109.9.128-137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article notes that the purpose and mechanism of protection of public order in private international law can be understood only at the origins of the rationale for this protection, — in the doctrine of F. K. Savigny. The reasons for the formulation of F. K. Savigny only two exceptions to the displacement of foreign laws by local law, and the characteristics of fixing these rules in Art. 30 of the Introductory Law to the GGU. Analyzed are attempts to misinterpret the doctrine of F. K. Savigny after the adoption of the Rome Convention “On the law applicable to contractual obligations” (1980) and the Decision of the EU Court (2016), which gave a final assessment of these attempts. The influence of the Dutch school on modern international private law in Russia is noted. The consolidation of super-imperative norms in the legislation of Russia and the Netherlands is investigated. It has been established that the first group of norms of direct application of Art. 1992 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the super-imperative nature of which in private cross-border legal relations is directly indicated by the legislator, has, in accordance with the theory of private international law, not a material, but a conflict character. The definition of super-imperative norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation, which ensure the protection of the constitutionally significant values of the state, is given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":238867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))\",\"volume\":\"69 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.109.9.128-137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.109.9.128-137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
文章指出,国际私法中保护公共秩序的目的和机制只能从这一保护的理论基础--F.K.萨维尼学说--来理解。F.K.萨维尼提出的理由只有两个,即外国法律被本国法律取代的例外情况,以及将这些规则固定在《国际私法介绍法》第 30 条中的特点。GGU 入门法》第 30 条中固定这些规则的特点。分析了在《关于合同义务适用法律的罗马公约》(1980 年)通过后对 F. K. 萨维尼学说的曲解尝试,以及欧盟法院对这些尝试做出最终评估的裁决(2016 年)。我们注意到荷兰学派对俄罗斯现代国际私法的影响。研究了俄罗斯和荷兰立法中超时空规范的整合情况。已确定直接适用《俄罗斯民法典》第 1992 条的第一组规范为:"......"。根据国际私法理论,《俄罗斯联邦民法典》第 1992 条直接适用的第一组规范,其在私人跨境法律关系中的超perative 性质由立法者直接指明,不具有实质性,而具有冲突性。俄罗斯联邦立法中确保保护国家宪法重要价值的超时空规范的定义已经给出。
Positive Clause on Public Order is the Basis for the Protection of Constitutionally Significant Values of the State
The article notes that the purpose and mechanism of protection of public order in private international law can be understood only at the origins of the rationale for this protection, — in the doctrine of F. K. Savigny. The reasons for the formulation of F. K. Savigny only two exceptions to the displacement of foreign laws by local law, and the characteristics of fixing these rules in Art. 30 of the Introductory Law to the GGU. Analyzed are attempts to misinterpret the doctrine of F. K. Savigny after the adoption of the Rome Convention “On the law applicable to contractual obligations” (1980) and the Decision of the EU Court (2016), which gave a final assessment of these attempts. The influence of the Dutch school on modern international private law in Russia is noted. The consolidation of super-imperative norms in the legislation of Russia and the Netherlands is investigated. It has been established that the first group of norms of direct application of Art. 1992 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the super-imperative nature of which in private cross-border legal relations is directly indicated by the legislator, has, in accordance with the theory of private international law, not a material, but a conflict character. The definition of super-imperative norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation, which ensure the protection of the constitutionally significant values of the state, is given.