私有财产、主权和排除权:康德的 "生产性不和谐

R. Picardi
{"title":"私有财产、主权和排除权:康德的 \"生产性不和谐","authors":"R. Picardi","doi":"10.7203/rek.8.2.27527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims at shedding light on a thesis, which appears not to be fully and systematically developed in Reinhardt’sbook: the thesis that Kant stands in the way of the main streams of contemporary philosophical-political debate, insofaras his legal-political philosophy allows for a fundamental questioning of the nexus between private property,sovereignty and the right of exclusion. To this end, one will firstly show how Reinhardt interprets the articulationbetween the three terms - land ownership, sovereignty, and the right of exclusion - by collecting the references to thissubject scattered throughout her book (§1). On the basis of this reconstruction, the essay will critically focus on twopoints: on the one hand, the nexus between private land ownership and \"public space\" (§ 2); on the other hand, thestatus of \"provisional possession\" in Kantian legal philosophy (§ 3).In conclusion, one will summon up the results of the analysis in order to put forward the distinctive features of Kant’sdeduction of property rights which allows to critically rethink the triad ownership/ sovereignty and exclusion.","PeriodicalId":153284,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios Kantianos","volume":"50 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proprietà privata, sovranità e diritto di escludere: la “disarmonia produttiva” di Kant\",\"authors\":\"R. Picardi\",\"doi\":\"10.7203/rek.8.2.27527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims at shedding light on a thesis, which appears not to be fully and systematically developed in Reinhardt’sbook: the thesis that Kant stands in the way of the main streams of contemporary philosophical-political debate, insofaras his legal-political philosophy allows for a fundamental questioning of the nexus between private property,sovereignty and the right of exclusion. To this end, one will firstly show how Reinhardt interprets the articulationbetween the three terms - land ownership, sovereignty, and the right of exclusion - by collecting the references to thissubject scattered throughout her book (§1). On the basis of this reconstruction, the essay will critically focus on twopoints: on the one hand, the nexus between private land ownership and \\\"public space\\\" (§ 2); on the other hand, thestatus of \\\"provisional possession\\\" in Kantian legal philosophy (§ 3).In conclusion, one will summon up the results of the analysis in order to put forward the distinctive features of Kant’sdeduction of property rights which allows to critically rethink the triad ownership/ sovereignty and exclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudios Kantianos\",\"volume\":\"50 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudios Kantianos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7203/rek.8.2.27527\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios Kantianos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/rek.8.2.27527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在阐明一个在莱因哈特的书中似乎没有得到充分和系统阐述的论点:康德阻碍了当代哲学-政治辩论的主流,因为他的法律-政治哲学允许从根本上质疑私有财产、主权和排斥权之间的关系。为此,我们将首先展示莱因哈特是如何解释土地所有权、主权和排他权这三个术语之间的衔接关系的,方法是收集散见于其书中有关这一主题的参考文献(§1)。在此基础上,文章将批判性地关注两个要点:一方面,私人土地所有权与 "公共空间 "之间的关系(第 2 节);另一方面,"临时占有 "在康德法律哲学中的地位(第 3 节)。最后,文章将总结分析结果,以提出康德对财产权演绎的独特之处,从而批判性地重新思考所有权/主权和排除权这三者之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proprietà privata, sovranità e diritto di escludere: la “disarmonia produttiva” di Kant
This paper aims at shedding light on a thesis, which appears not to be fully and systematically developed in Reinhardt’sbook: the thesis that Kant stands in the way of the main streams of contemporary philosophical-political debate, insofaras his legal-political philosophy allows for a fundamental questioning of the nexus between private property,sovereignty and the right of exclusion. To this end, one will firstly show how Reinhardt interprets the articulationbetween the three terms - land ownership, sovereignty, and the right of exclusion - by collecting the references to thissubject scattered throughout her book (§1). On the basis of this reconstruction, the essay will critically focus on twopoints: on the one hand, the nexus between private land ownership and "public space" (§ 2); on the other hand, thestatus of "provisional possession" in Kantian legal philosophy (§ 3).In conclusion, one will summon up the results of the analysis in order to put forward the distinctive features of Kant’sdeduction of property rights which allows to critically rethink the triad ownership/ sovereignty and exclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信