小规模社会中妇女狩猎的生态和社会背景

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Jordie Hoffman, Kyle Farquharson, Vivek V Venkataraman
{"title":"小规模社会中妇女狩猎的生态和社会背景","authors":"Jordie Hoffman, Kyle Farquharson, Vivek V Venkataraman","doi":"10.3828/hgr.2023.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women participate in hunting in some foraging societies but not in others. To examine the socioecological factors that are conducive to women’s hunting, we conducted an ethnographic survey using the Human Relations Area Files and other selected sources authored in the past 200 years. Based on life history theory and behavioural ecology, we predicted that women should engage in hunting when: i) it poses few conflicts with childcare, ii) it is associated with few cultural restrictions around the use of hunting technology, iii) it involves low-risk game within range of camp, with the aid of dogs, and/or in groups, and, iv) women fulfil key logistical or informational roles. We systematically reviewed ethnographic documents across 64 societies and coded 242 paragraphs for the above variables. The data largely support theoretical expectations. When women hunted, they did so in a fundamentally different manner than men, focusing on smaller game and hunting in larger groups near camp, often with the aid of dogs. There was little evidence to suggest that women only participated in hunting during non-reproductive years; instead, allocate networks were a prominent strategy for mitigating trade-offs between hunting and childcare responsibilities. Women commonly fulfilled crucial informational, logistical and ritualistic roles. Cultural restrictions limited women’s participation in hunting, but not to the extent commonly assumed. These data offer a cross-cultural framework for making inferences about whether and how women’s hunting occurred in the past.","PeriodicalId":36941,"journal":{"name":"Hunter Gatherer Research","volume":"13 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ecological and social context of women’s hunting in small-scale societies\",\"authors\":\"Jordie Hoffman, Kyle Farquharson, Vivek V Venkataraman\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/hgr.2023.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Women participate in hunting in some foraging societies but not in others. To examine the socioecological factors that are conducive to women’s hunting, we conducted an ethnographic survey using the Human Relations Area Files and other selected sources authored in the past 200 years. Based on life history theory and behavioural ecology, we predicted that women should engage in hunting when: i) it poses few conflicts with childcare, ii) it is associated with few cultural restrictions around the use of hunting technology, iii) it involves low-risk game within range of camp, with the aid of dogs, and/or in groups, and, iv) women fulfil key logistical or informational roles. We systematically reviewed ethnographic documents across 64 societies and coded 242 paragraphs for the above variables. The data largely support theoretical expectations. When women hunted, they did so in a fundamentally different manner than men, focusing on smaller game and hunting in larger groups near camp, often with the aid of dogs. There was little evidence to suggest that women only participated in hunting during non-reproductive years; instead, allocate networks were a prominent strategy for mitigating trade-offs between hunting and childcare responsibilities. Women commonly fulfilled crucial informational, logistical and ritualistic roles. Cultural restrictions limited women’s participation in hunting, but not to the extent commonly assumed. These data offer a cross-cultural framework for making inferences about whether and how women’s hunting occurred in the past.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hunter Gatherer Research\",\"volume\":\"13 26\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hunter Gatherer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/hgr.2023.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hunter Gatherer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/hgr.2023.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一些狩猎社会中,妇女参与狩猎,而在另一些狩猎社会中,妇女则不参与狩猎。为了研究有利于妇女狩猎的社会生态因素,我们利用《人类关系地区档案》和过去 200 年中撰写的其他精选资料进行了一项人种学调查。根据生活史理论和行为生态学,我们预测妇女应该在以下情况下参与狩猎:i) 狩猎与照顾孩子的冲突很少;ii) 与使用狩猎技术相关的文化限制很少;iii) 在营地范围内、在狗的帮助下和/或集体狩猎低风险的猎物;iv) 妇女扮演关键的后勤或信息角色。我们系统地查阅了 64 个社会的人种学文献,并针对上述变量对 242 个段落进行了编码。数据在很大程度上支持了理论预期。当女性狩猎时,她们的狩猎方式与男性有本质区别,她们专注于较小的猎物,在营地附近以较大的群体狩猎,通常有狗的帮助。几乎没有证据表明妇女只在非生育期参加狩猎;相反,分配网络是减轻狩猎和育儿责任之间权衡的一个重要策略。妇女通常扮演着重要的信息、后勤和仪式角色。文化限制限制了妇女参与狩猎,但并不像通常认为的那样。这些数据提供了一个跨文化框架,用于推断过去妇女是否以及如何进行狩猎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ecological and social context of women’s hunting in small-scale societies
Women participate in hunting in some foraging societies but not in others. To examine the socioecological factors that are conducive to women’s hunting, we conducted an ethnographic survey using the Human Relations Area Files and other selected sources authored in the past 200 years. Based on life history theory and behavioural ecology, we predicted that women should engage in hunting when: i) it poses few conflicts with childcare, ii) it is associated with few cultural restrictions around the use of hunting technology, iii) it involves low-risk game within range of camp, with the aid of dogs, and/or in groups, and, iv) women fulfil key logistical or informational roles. We systematically reviewed ethnographic documents across 64 societies and coded 242 paragraphs for the above variables. The data largely support theoretical expectations. When women hunted, they did so in a fundamentally different manner than men, focusing on smaller game and hunting in larger groups near camp, often with the aid of dogs. There was little evidence to suggest that women only participated in hunting during non-reproductive years; instead, allocate networks were a prominent strategy for mitigating trade-offs between hunting and childcare responsibilities. Women commonly fulfilled crucial informational, logistical and ritualistic roles. Cultural restrictions limited women’s participation in hunting, but not to the extent commonly assumed. These data offer a cross-cultural framework for making inferences about whether and how women’s hunting occurred in the past.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hunter Gatherer Research
Hunter Gatherer Research Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信