含水层管理:建立可交易水权制度:天然排水和盐度的影响

Q3 Environmental Science
Athanasios Tsiarapas, Zisis Mallios
{"title":"含水层管理:建立可交易水权制度:天然排水和盐度的影响","authors":"Athanasios Tsiarapas, Zisis Mallios","doi":"10.5755/j01.erem.79.4.33795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economic instruments such as tradable water rights systems have been proposed as cost-effective methods for managing groundwater. The relevant literature shows that the majority of the relevant studies do not consider aquifer’s natural discharge, which is expected to have a significant impact on the determination of the optimal groundwater management policy. This paper attempts to highlight the impact of considering natural discharge in the formulation of groundwater management policies. Thus, two different cases of aquifer management are considered and the corresponding time-dynamic problems are solved by considering natural discharge in order to derive optimal trajectories for a number of key variables. These cases are (1) non-intervention – full competition and (2) intervention with a tradable water rights system. The results obtained from simulations on a coastal aquifer show that indeed not considering the natural discharge leads to an overestimation of the benefits from groundwater consumption that can reach 5.79% in the case of non-intervention and in the case of intervention with a tradable water rights system. ","PeriodicalId":11703,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research, Engineering and Management","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aquifer Management Establishing a Tradable Water Rights System: The Effect of Natural Discharge and Salinity\",\"authors\":\"Athanasios Tsiarapas, Zisis Mallios\",\"doi\":\"10.5755/j01.erem.79.4.33795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Economic instruments such as tradable water rights systems have been proposed as cost-effective methods for managing groundwater. The relevant literature shows that the majority of the relevant studies do not consider aquifer’s natural discharge, which is expected to have a significant impact on the determination of the optimal groundwater management policy. This paper attempts to highlight the impact of considering natural discharge in the formulation of groundwater management policies. Thus, two different cases of aquifer management are considered and the corresponding time-dynamic problems are solved by considering natural discharge in order to derive optimal trajectories for a number of key variables. These cases are (1) non-intervention – full competition and (2) intervention with a tradable water rights system. The results obtained from simulations on a coastal aquifer show that indeed not considering the natural discharge leads to an overestimation of the benefits from groundwater consumption that can reach 5.79% in the case of non-intervention and in the case of intervention with a tradable water rights system. \",\"PeriodicalId\":11703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Research, Engineering and Management\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Research, Engineering and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.79.4.33795\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research, Engineering and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.79.4.33795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可交易水权制度等经济手段已被提出作为管理地下水的具有成本效益的方法。相关文献表明,大多数相关研究没有考虑含水层的自然排泄量,而自然排泄量预计会对确定最佳地下水管理政策产生重大影响。本文试图强调在制定地下水管理政策时考虑自然排泄量的影响。因此,本文考虑了含水层管理的两种不同情况,并通过考虑自然排泄量来解决相应的时间动态问题,从而得出一些关键变量的最优轨迹。这两种情况是:(1) 非干预--充分竞争;(2) 干预--可交易水权制度。对沿海含水层的模拟结果表明,不考虑自然排泄量确实会导致高估地下水消耗所带来的收益,在不干预的情况下和在采用可交易水权制度进行干预的情况下,高估的收益可达 5.79%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aquifer Management Establishing a Tradable Water Rights System: The Effect of Natural Discharge and Salinity
Economic instruments such as tradable water rights systems have been proposed as cost-effective methods for managing groundwater. The relevant literature shows that the majority of the relevant studies do not consider aquifer’s natural discharge, which is expected to have a significant impact on the determination of the optimal groundwater management policy. This paper attempts to highlight the impact of considering natural discharge in the formulation of groundwater management policies. Thus, two different cases of aquifer management are considered and the corresponding time-dynamic problems are solved by considering natural discharge in order to derive optimal trajectories for a number of key variables. These cases are (1) non-intervention – full competition and (2) intervention with a tradable water rights system. The results obtained from simulations on a coastal aquifer show that indeed not considering the natural discharge leads to an overestimation of the benefits from groundwater consumption that can reach 5.79% in the case of non-intervention and in the case of intervention with a tradable water rights system. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Research, Engineering and Management
Environmental Research, Engineering and Management Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: First published in 1995, the journal Environmental Research, Engineering and Management (EREM) is an international multidisciplinary journal designed to serve as a roadmap for understanding complex issues and debates of sustainable development. EREM publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers which cover research in the fields of environmental science, engineering (pollution prevention, resource efficiency), management, energy (renewables), agricultural and biological sciences, and social sciences. EREM’s topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following: environmental research, ecological monitoring, and climate change; environmental pollution – impact assessment, mitigation, and prevention; environmental engineering, sustainable production, and eco innovations; environmental management, strategy, standards, social responsibility; environmental economics, policy, and law; sustainable consumption and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信