基于彭德健康促进模式的培训对自我效能感的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-23 DOI:10.1177/08901171231224101
Amir Jalali, Arash Ziapour, Ebrahim Ezzati, Shahrokh Kazemi, Mohsen Kazeminia
{"title":"基于彭德健康促进模式的培训对自我效能感的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Amir Jalali, Arash Ziapour, Ebrahim Ezzati, Shahrokh Kazemi, Mohsen Kazeminia","doi":"10.1177/08901171231224101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The concept of self-efficacy is a determining factor in many behaviours related to health promotion and health education. Several pilot studies have been conducted in different parts of the world on different populations regarding the impact of training based on the Pender Health Promotion Model on self-efficacy, yielding conflicting results. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted with the aim of evaluating and summarizing the results of studies on the impact of training based on the Pender Health Promotion Model on self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>MagIran, SID, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and Google Scholar.</p><p><strong>Study inclusion and exclusion criteria: </strong>Original scientific research articles; Interventional studies; Studies investigating the effects of education based on the Pender Health Promotion Model on self-efficacy; Studies irrelevant to the objective; Cross-sectional studies; case reports; and papers presented in conferences; letters to the editor; systematic and meta-analysis studies.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the quality of the 18 included studies using a pre-prepared checklist for the systematic review and meta-analysis process.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>We conducted meta-analyses and reported the characteristics, outcomes, and risk of bias of studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines until December 2022. The quality assessment of the included articles for meta-analysis was performed using the JBI checklist. Heterogeneity of the studies was calculated using the <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> statistics, and Egger's regression intercept was used to assess publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the initial search, 13,943 studies were found, and after excluding studies irrelevant to the research objective, a total of 18 articles were included in the meta-analysis. These articles represented a sample size of 1015 individuals in the intervention group and 999 individuals in the control group. The combined results of the studies showed a significant increase in self-efficacy in the intervention group when compared to the control group (1.788 ± .267; CI: 95%, <i>P</i> < .001). With an increase in the year of study and the quality assessment score of the articles, the effect of the intervention decreased (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study indicated that training based on the Pender Health Promotion Model significantly increased self-efficacy. Therefore, it seems that training based on this model can have positive effects on individuals' self-efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Training Based on the Pender Health Promotion Model on Self-Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Jalali, Arash Ziapour, Ebrahim Ezzati, Shahrokh Kazemi, Mohsen Kazeminia\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171231224101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The concept of self-efficacy is a determining factor in many behaviours related to health promotion and health education. Several pilot studies have been conducted in different parts of the world on different populations regarding the impact of training based on the Pender Health Promotion Model on self-efficacy, yielding conflicting results. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted with the aim of evaluating and summarizing the results of studies on the impact of training based on the Pender Health Promotion Model on self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>MagIran, SID, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and Google Scholar.</p><p><strong>Study inclusion and exclusion criteria: </strong>Original scientific research articles; Interventional studies; Studies investigating the effects of education based on the Pender Health Promotion Model on self-efficacy; Studies irrelevant to the objective; Cross-sectional studies; case reports; and papers presented in conferences; letters to the editor; systematic and meta-analysis studies.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the quality of the 18 included studies using a pre-prepared checklist for the systematic review and meta-analysis process.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>We conducted meta-analyses and reported the characteristics, outcomes, and risk of bias of studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines until December 2022. The quality assessment of the included articles for meta-analysis was performed using the JBI checklist. Heterogeneity of the studies was calculated using the <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> statistics, and Egger's regression intercept was used to assess publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the initial search, 13,943 studies were found, and after excluding studies irrelevant to the research objective, a total of 18 articles were included in the meta-analysis. These articles represented a sample size of 1015 individuals in the intervention group and 999 individuals in the control group. The combined results of the studies showed a significant increase in self-efficacy in the intervention group when compared to the control group (1.788 ± .267; CI: 95%, <i>P</i> < .001). With an increase in the year of study and the quality assessment score of the articles, the effect of the intervention decreased (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study indicated that training based on the Pender Health Promotion Model significantly increased self-efficacy. Therefore, it seems that training based on this model can have positive effects on individuals' self-efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171231224101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171231224101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自我效能感的概念是与健康促进和健康教育有关的许多行为的决定性因素。世界各地针对不同人群开展了多项试点研究,探讨基于彭德健康促进模式的培训对自我效能感的影响,但得出的结果相互矛盾。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估和总结基于彭德健康促进模式的培训对自我效能影响的研究结果:数据来源:MagIran、SID、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science (WoS)、Scopus 和 Google Scholar:原始科学研究文章;干预性研究;调查基于彭德健康促进模式的教育对自我效能影响的研究;与目标无关的研究;横断面研究;病例报告;以及在会议上发表的论文;致编辑的信;系统和荟萃分析研究:两名独立审稿人使用事先准备好的系统综述和荟萃分析过程核对表提取数据,并对纳入的 18 项研究进行质量评估:我们进行了荟萃分析,并报告了研究的特点、结果和偏倚风险:本研究根据 PRISMA 指南进行,直至 2022 年 12 月。采用 JBI 检查表对纳入的文章进行了质量评估。使用I2统计量计算研究的异质性,并使用Egger回归截距评估发表偏倚:在最初的搜索中,共发现了 13943 项研究,在排除了与研究目标无关的研究后,共有 18 篇文章被纳入荟萃分析。这些文章的干预组样本量为 1015 人,对照组样本量为 999 人。研究的综合结果表明,与对照组相比,干预组的自我效能显著提高(1.788 ± .267;CI:95%,P < .001)。随着研究年份和文章质量评估分数的增加,干预效果下降(P < .001):本研究结果表明,基于彭德健康促进模式的培训能显著提高自我效能感。因此,基于该模型的培训似乎可以对个人的自我效能产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Training Based on the Pender Health Promotion Model on Self-Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: The concept of self-efficacy is a determining factor in many behaviours related to health promotion and health education. Several pilot studies have been conducted in different parts of the world on different populations regarding the impact of training based on the Pender Health Promotion Model on self-efficacy, yielding conflicting results. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted with the aim of evaluating and summarizing the results of studies on the impact of training based on the Pender Health Promotion Model on self-efficacy.

Data source: MagIran, SID, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and Google Scholar.

Study inclusion and exclusion criteria: Original scientific research articles; Interventional studies; Studies investigating the effects of education based on the Pender Health Promotion Model on self-efficacy; Studies irrelevant to the objective; Cross-sectional studies; case reports; and papers presented in conferences; letters to the editor; systematic and meta-analysis studies.

Data extraction: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the quality of the 18 included studies using a pre-prepared checklist for the systematic review and meta-analysis process.

Data synthesis: We conducted meta-analyses and reported the characteristics, outcomes, and risk of bias of studies.

Methods: The present study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines until December 2022. The quality assessment of the included articles for meta-analysis was performed using the JBI checklist. Heterogeneity of the studies was calculated using the I2 statistics, and Egger's regression intercept was used to assess publication bias.

Results: In the initial search, 13,943 studies were found, and after excluding studies irrelevant to the research objective, a total of 18 articles were included in the meta-analysis. These articles represented a sample size of 1015 individuals in the intervention group and 999 individuals in the control group. The combined results of the studies showed a significant increase in self-efficacy in the intervention group when compared to the control group (1.788 ± .267; CI: 95%, P < .001). With an increase in the year of study and the quality assessment score of the articles, the effect of the intervention decreased (P < .001).

Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that training based on the Pender Health Promotion Model significantly increased self-efficacy. Therefore, it seems that training based on this model can have positive effects on individuals' self-efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信