会阴坏死性软组织感染患者粪便转流对存活率的影响: 一项大型回顾性研究

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Vincent MAYORAL , Dorothée COQUEREL-BEGHIN , Jean-Nicolas CORNU , Valérie BRIDOUX , Isabelle AUQUIT-AUCKBUR , Christian PFISTER
{"title":"会阴坏死性软组织感染患者粪便转流对存活率的影响: 一项大型回顾性研究","authors":"Vincent MAYORAL ,&nbsp;Dorothée COQUEREL-BEGHIN ,&nbsp;Jean-Nicolas CORNU ,&nbsp;Valérie BRIDOUX ,&nbsp;Isabelle AUQUIT-AUCKBUR ,&nbsp;Christian PFISTER","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Colostomy is usually proposed during the acute phase of Fournier Gangrene, nevertheless its impact on disease outcome remains still debated. We conducted a retrospective study in an academic center to determine the impact of fecal diversion on disease morbidity and specific survival.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All medical charts of Fournier Gangrene cases in the past 30-years were reviewed. Mortality rate, hospitalization duration, time to complete healing and number of excision surgeries were compared between the stoma and the non-stoma groups. Time between initial diagnosis and stoma creation, type of fecal diversion, as well as specific morbidity were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 89 patients included, 59 had stoma creation. Stoma group had significant higher catecholamine drugs use. Mortality, time to complete healing and number of excision surgeries did not significantly differ between both groups. Hospitalization duration was significantly higher in the stoma group. Mortality and hospitalization duration were higher when loop transverse colostomy was performed, and when colostomy was done in the first 3-days. Morbidity occurred in 41 % of patients with colostomy, with 25 % life-threatening complications. 31 % of colostomies remained definitive, while median time to intestinal recovery was 159-days.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Consistently with current literature, disease survival was not improved by colostomy creation although skewed. Colostomy creation was associated with a higher hospitalization duration and a significant morbidity including risk of definitive stoma. To limit over-indicated stoma and improve early results, a damage control strategy using colostomy creation is advised.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The benefit of colostomy during the acute phase of Fournier Gangrene was uncertain, with no clear impact on mortality. In fact, colostomy was associated with increased hospitalization duration and specific morbidity. Finally, when fecal diversion is deemed necessary, we advocate for coelioscopic delayed loop left colostomy. Alternative minimally invasive treatment as bowel catheters should also be discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000773/pdfft?md5=f2419ded28a5f45a7b26bbab3031477f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262023000773-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of fecal diversion in Perineal Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection on disease survival: A large retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Vincent MAYORAL ,&nbsp;Dorothée COQUEREL-BEGHIN ,&nbsp;Jean-Nicolas CORNU ,&nbsp;Valérie BRIDOUX ,&nbsp;Isabelle AUQUIT-AUCKBUR ,&nbsp;Christian PFISTER\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Colostomy is usually proposed during the acute phase of Fournier Gangrene, nevertheless its impact on disease outcome remains still debated. We conducted a retrospective study in an academic center to determine the impact of fecal diversion on disease morbidity and specific survival.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All medical charts of Fournier Gangrene cases in the past 30-years were reviewed. Mortality rate, hospitalization duration, time to complete healing and number of excision surgeries were compared between the stoma and the non-stoma groups. Time between initial diagnosis and stoma creation, type of fecal diversion, as well as specific morbidity were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 89 patients included, 59 had stoma creation. Stoma group had significant higher catecholamine drugs use. Mortality, time to complete healing and number of excision surgeries did not significantly differ between both groups. Hospitalization duration was significantly higher in the stoma group. Mortality and hospitalization duration were higher when loop transverse colostomy was performed, and when colostomy was done in the first 3-days. Morbidity occurred in 41 % of patients with colostomy, with 25 % life-threatening complications. 31 % of colostomies remained definitive, while median time to intestinal recovery was 159-days.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Consistently with current literature, disease survival was not improved by colostomy creation although skewed. Colostomy creation was associated with a higher hospitalization duration and a significant morbidity including risk of definitive stoma. To limit over-indicated stoma and improve early results, a damage control strategy using colostomy creation is advised.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The benefit of colostomy during the acute phase of Fournier Gangrene was uncertain, with no clear impact on mortality. In fact, colostomy was associated with increased hospitalization duration and specific morbidity. Finally, when fecal diversion is deemed necessary, we advocate for coelioscopic delayed loop left colostomy. Alternative minimally invasive treatment as bowel catheters should also be discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000773/pdfft?md5=f2419ded28a5f45a7b26bbab3031477f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262023000773-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言通常在福尼尔坏疽急性期建议进行造口术,但其对疾病预后的影响仍存在争议。我们在一家学术中心进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定粪便转流对疾病发病率和具体存活率的影响。比较造口组和非造口组的死亡率、住院时间、完全愈合时间和切除手术次数。结果 89 名患者中,59 人造口术。造口组使用儿茶酚胺药物的比例明显较高。两组患者的死亡率、完全愈合时间和切除手术次数无明显差异。造口组的住院时间明显较长。进行环形横结肠造口术和在头三天进行结肠造口术时,死亡率和住院时间较长。41%的结肠造口患者出现了发病率,其中25%出现了危及生命的并发症。31%的结肠造口术仍然有效,而肠道恢复的中位时间为 159 天。建立结肠造口与较长的住院时间和显著的发病率相关,包括最终造口的风险。结论 在福尼尔坏疽急性期进行结肠造口术的益处并不确定,对死亡率也没有明显影响。事实上,结肠造口术与住院时间延长和特定发病率增加有关。最后,当认为有必要进行粪便转流时,我们主张采用腹腔镜延迟环状左结肠造口术。此外,还应讨论肠导管等其他微创治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of fecal diversion in Perineal Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection on disease survival: A large retrospective study

Introduction

Colostomy is usually proposed during the acute phase of Fournier Gangrene, nevertheless its impact on disease outcome remains still debated. We conducted a retrospective study in an academic center to determine the impact of fecal diversion on disease morbidity and specific survival.

Methods

All medical charts of Fournier Gangrene cases in the past 30-years were reviewed. Mortality rate, hospitalization duration, time to complete healing and number of excision surgeries were compared between the stoma and the non-stoma groups. Time between initial diagnosis and stoma creation, type of fecal diversion, as well as specific morbidity were analyzed.

Results

Of 89 patients included, 59 had stoma creation. Stoma group had significant higher catecholamine drugs use. Mortality, time to complete healing and number of excision surgeries did not significantly differ between both groups. Hospitalization duration was significantly higher in the stoma group. Mortality and hospitalization duration were higher when loop transverse colostomy was performed, and when colostomy was done in the first 3-days. Morbidity occurred in 41 % of patients with colostomy, with 25 % life-threatening complications. 31 % of colostomies remained definitive, while median time to intestinal recovery was 159-days.

Discussion

Consistently with current literature, disease survival was not improved by colostomy creation although skewed. Colostomy creation was associated with a higher hospitalization duration and a significant morbidity including risk of definitive stoma. To limit over-indicated stoma and improve early results, a damage control strategy using colostomy creation is advised.

Conclusion

The benefit of colostomy during the acute phase of Fournier Gangrene was uncertain, with no clear impact on mortality. In fact, colostomy was associated with increased hospitalization duration and specific morbidity. Finally, when fecal diversion is deemed necessary, we advocate for coelioscopic delayed loop left colostomy. Alternative minimally invasive treatment as bowel catheters should also be discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信