pH值对表面活性剂诱导皮肤刺激的影响。一项使用十二烷基硫酸钠的无创多参数研究。

J L Antoine, J L Contreras, D J Van Neste
{"title":"pH值对表面活性剂诱导皮肤刺激的影响。一项使用十二烷基硫酸钠的无创多参数研究。","authors":"J L Antoine,&nbsp;J L Contreras,&nbsp;D J Van Neste","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Even though various experimental methods have been proposed for in vitro testing of detergents such as LSL (sodium laurylsulfate) no absolutely relevant clinical information can be inferred from them as to the irritancy of a given compound. In particular the relative importance of pH needs further assessment. This study reports on in vivo evaluation of skin function changes under given experimental conditions with SLS applied at 3 different pH values. There is a dramatic increase of transepidermal water loss (TEWL), i.e. a substantial reduction in the barrier function of the skin, when SLS is applied under occlusion for 48 H. The alkaline control solution (NaOH pH 9) induced low-grade, but significant TEWL increases, as compared to the other controls (distilled water pH 7; HCl pH 5), which had no influence on TEWL. The changes obtained with the controls were much lower than those observed with SLS. The barrier-function changes induced by the surfactant SLS could, however, promote transepidermal passage of acid and/or alkaline molecules, hence increasing toxic damage of the skin; yet no such effects could be observed, indicating that the main effects are due to detergency. Assessment of cutaneous blood flow values (CBFV) by laser Doppler velocimetry showed increased values after SLS. When pH-adjusted SLS solutions were compared, there was neither a difference in relation to pH nor did the control solutions induce any significant CBFV change. This study reveals that TEWL and CBFV are probably the most reliable methods to investigate acute irritancy by SLS. Accordingly, pH cannot be considered as a major contributive factor of irritancy when SLS solutions are applied under occlusion (48 h).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":11073,"journal":{"name":"Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and environment","volume":"37 3","pages":"96-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"pH influence of surfactant-induced skin irritation. A non-invasive, multiparametric study with sodium laurylsulfate.\",\"authors\":\"J L Antoine,&nbsp;J L Contreras,&nbsp;D J Van Neste\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Even though various experimental methods have been proposed for in vitro testing of detergents such as LSL (sodium laurylsulfate) no absolutely relevant clinical information can be inferred from them as to the irritancy of a given compound. In particular the relative importance of pH needs further assessment. This study reports on in vivo evaluation of skin function changes under given experimental conditions with SLS applied at 3 different pH values. There is a dramatic increase of transepidermal water loss (TEWL), i.e. a substantial reduction in the barrier function of the skin, when SLS is applied under occlusion for 48 H. The alkaline control solution (NaOH pH 9) induced low-grade, but significant TEWL increases, as compared to the other controls (distilled water pH 7; HCl pH 5), which had no influence on TEWL. The changes obtained with the controls were much lower than those observed with SLS. The barrier-function changes induced by the surfactant SLS could, however, promote transepidermal passage of acid and/or alkaline molecules, hence increasing toxic damage of the skin; yet no such effects could be observed, indicating that the main effects are due to detergency. Assessment of cutaneous blood flow values (CBFV) by laser Doppler velocimetry showed increased values after SLS. When pH-adjusted SLS solutions were compared, there was neither a difference in relation to pH nor did the control solutions induce any significant CBFV change. This study reveals that TEWL and CBFV are probably the most reliable methods to investigate acute irritancy by SLS. Accordingly, pH cannot be considered as a major contributive factor of irritancy when SLS solutions are applied under occlusion (48 h).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and environment\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"96-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管已经提出了各种实验方法来体外测试洗涤剂,如LSL(月桂基硫酸钠),但从这些方法中无法推断出特定化合物的刺激性的绝对相关临床信息。特别是pH值的相对重要性需要进一步评估。本研究报告了在给定的实验条件下,在3种不同的pH值下使用SLS对皮肤功能变化的体内评价。当SLS在闭塞状态下应用48 h时,经皮失水(TEWL)急剧增加,即皮肤屏障功能大幅降低。碱性对照溶液(NaOH pH 9)与其他对照(蒸馏水pH 7;HCl pH 5),对TEWL无影响。对照组获得的变化远低于SLS组观察到的变化。表面活性剂SLS诱导的屏障功能改变可促进酸性和/或碱性分子经皮通过,从而增加皮肤的毒性损伤;然而,没有观察到这样的影响,表明主要影响是由于去污力。激光多普勒测速仪测量皮肤血流量值(CBFV)显示SLS后升高。当比较pH调整后的SLS溶液时,既没有与pH相关的差异,也没有对照溶液引起任何显著的CBFV变化。本研究表明TEWL和CBFV可能是SLS研究急性刺激最可靠的方法。因此,当SLS溶液在闭塞状态下应用(48小时)时,pH值不能被认为是刺激的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
pH influence of surfactant-induced skin irritation. A non-invasive, multiparametric study with sodium laurylsulfate.

Even though various experimental methods have been proposed for in vitro testing of detergents such as LSL (sodium laurylsulfate) no absolutely relevant clinical information can be inferred from them as to the irritancy of a given compound. In particular the relative importance of pH needs further assessment. This study reports on in vivo evaluation of skin function changes under given experimental conditions with SLS applied at 3 different pH values. There is a dramatic increase of transepidermal water loss (TEWL), i.e. a substantial reduction in the barrier function of the skin, when SLS is applied under occlusion for 48 H. The alkaline control solution (NaOH pH 9) induced low-grade, but significant TEWL increases, as compared to the other controls (distilled water pH 7; HCl pH 5), which had no influence on TEWL. The changes obtained with the controls were much lower than those observed with SLS. The barrier-function changes induced by the surfactant SLS could, however, promote transepidermal passage of acid and/or alkaline molecules, hence increasing toxic damage of the skin; yet no such effects could be observed, indicating that the main effects are due to detergency. Assessment of cutaneous blood flow values (CBFV) by laser Doppler velocimetry showed increased values after SLS. When pH-adjusted SLS solutions were compared, there was neither a difference in relation to pH nor did the control solutions induce any significant CBFV change. This study reveals that TEWL and CBFV are probably the most reliable methods to investigate acute irritancy by SLS. Accordingly, pH cannot be considered as a major contributive factor of irritancy when SLS solutions are applied under occlusion (48 h).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信