赤足行走对持续性足跟痛患者有益:单盲随机对照试验

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Miriam Reinstein , Asaf Weisman , Youssef Masharawi
{"title":"赤足行走对持续性足跟痛患者有益:单盲随机对照试验","authors":"Miriam Reinstein ,&nbsp;Asaf Weisman ,&nbsp;Youssef Masharawi","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A lack of data exist about the effectiveness of active treatments for persistent plantar heel pain (PPHP).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare short-term functional and clinical effects of a 4-week barefoot or shod treadmill walking program for people with PPHP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-blinded clinical trial randomized 52 participants with PPHP into either a barefoot walking group (BWG), or a shod walking group (SWG). All participants received therapeutic ultrasound. Outcomes were measured at baseline (t<sub>0</sub>), following 4 weeks of treatment (t<sub>1</sub>), and at 1-month follow-up (t<sub>2</sub>). The SF-36 functional questionnaire score was the main outcome. Secondary outcomes were self-reported and clinically-assessed pain provocation levels, pressure pain thresholds and pain tolerance. Treadmill walking time and speed were measured at t<sub>0</sub> and t<sub>1</sub>; people also recorded the time spent walking each day in a diary.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The BWG exhibited significant improvements in all SF-36 items (except “emotional well-being”) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), whereas the SWG exhibited improvements only in “pain” and “health change” items (<em>P</em> = 0.0001; effect size 0.13–0.94). Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG for “physical function” (<em>P</em> = 0.019) and “role limitations due to physical health” items (<em>P</em> = 0.035). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain, with greater improvements in the BWG (<em>P</em> = 0.0001; effect size 0.89). Only the BWG showed significant improvements in pain pressure thresholds (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05; effect size 0.70) and pain tolerance (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; effect size 0.67). Both groups significantly increased their speed and time spent walking on the treadmill (BWG Δ=19.7 min and Δ=1.7 km/h; SWG Δ=16.7 min and Δ=1.1 km/h) and time outdoors (SWG ∆=38.2 min/week; BWG mean ∆=48.5 min/week) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). All clinical tests of pain were significantly less positive in the BWG at all time points (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both walking programs benefited people with PPHP by alleviating pain and improving function and quality of life. Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG overall.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"67 2","pages":"Article 101786"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barefoot walking is beneficial for individuals with persistent plantar heel pain: A single-blind randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Miriam Reinstein ,&nbsp;Asaf Weisman ,&nbsp;Youssef Masharawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A lack of data exist about the effectiveness of active treatments for persistent plantar heel pain (PPHP).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare short-term functional and clinical effects of a 4-week barefoot or shod treadmill walking program for people with PPHP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-blinded clinical trial randomized 52 participants with PPHP into either a barefoot walking group (BWG), or a shod walking group (SWG). All participants received therapeutic ultrasound. Outcomes were measured at baseline (t<sub>0</sub>), following 4 weeks of treatment (t<sub>1</sub>), and at 1-month follow-up (t<sub>2</sub>). The SF-36 functional questionnaire score was the main outcome. Secondary outcomes were self-reported and clinically-assessed pain provocation levels, pressure pain thresholds and pain tolerance. Treadmill walking time and speed were measured at t<sub>0</sub> and t<sub>1</sub>; people also recorded the time spent walking each day in a diary.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The BWG exhibited significant improvements in all SF-36 items (except “emotional well-being”) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), whereas the SWG exhibited improvements only in “pain” and “health change” items (<em>P</em> = 0.0001; effect size 0.13–0.94). Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG for “physical function” (<em>P</em> = 0.019) and “role limitations due to physical health” items (<em>P</em> = 0.035). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain, with greater improvements in the BWG (<em>P</em> = 0.0001; effect size 0.89). Only the BWG showed significant improvements in pain pressure thresholds (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05; effect size 0.70) and pain tolerance (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001; effect size 0.67). Both groups significantly increased their speed and time spent walking on the treadmill (BWG Δ=19.7 min and Δ=1.7 km/h; SWG Δ=16.7 min and Δ=1.1 km/h) and time outdoors (SWG ∆=38.2 min/week; BWG mean ∆=48.5 min/week) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). All clinical tests of pain were significantly less positive in the BWG at all time points (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both walking programs benefited people with PPHP by alleviating pain and improving function and quality of life. Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG overall.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"volume\":\"67 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101786\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187706572300057X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187706572300057X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前还缺乏有关足跟痛的积极治疗效果的数据:目前还缺乏关于足跟痛治疗有效性的数据:方法:一项单盲临床试验将52名PPHP患者随机分为赤足行走组(赤足行走组)和穿鞋行走组(穿鞋行走组):一项单盲临床试验将52名PPHP患者随机分为赤足行走组(BWG)或穿鞋行走组(SWG)。所有参与者都接受了超声波治疗。结果分别在基线(t0)、治疗 4 周后(t1)和随访 1 个月后(t2)进行测量。主要结果是 SF-36 功能问卷得分。次要结果是自我报告和临床评估的疼痛激发水平、压痛阈值和疼痛耐受性。在第0天和第1天测量了在跑步机上行走的时间和速度;患者还在日记中记录了每天行走的时间:结果:BWG 在所有 SF-36 项目(除 "情绪健康 "外)上都有明显改善(P 结论:BWG 和 BWG 都对 PPD 患者有益:两种步行计划都能减轻 PPHP 患者的疼痛,改善其功能和生活质量。与 SWG 相比,BWG 的总体改善幅度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barefoot walking is beneficial for individuals with persistent plantar heel pain: A single-blind randomized controlled trial

Background

A lack of data exist about the effectiveness of active treatments for persistent plantar heel pain (PPHP).

Objectives

To compare short-term functional and clinical effects of a 4-week barefoot or shod treadmill walking program for people with PPHP.

Methods

A single-blinded clinical trial randomized 52 participants with PPHP into either a barefoot walking group (BWG), or a shod walking group (SWG). All participants received therapeutic ultrasound. Outcomes were measured at baseline (t0), following 4 weeks of treatment (t1), and at 1-month follow-up (t2). The SF-36 functional questionnaire score was the main outcome. Secondary outcomes were self-reported and clinically-assessed pain provocation levels, pressure pain thresholds and pain tolerance. Treadmill walking time and speed were measured at t0 and t1; people also recorded the time spent walking each day in a diary.

Results

The BWG exhibited significant improvements in all SF-36 items (except “emotional well-being”) (P < 0.05), whereas the SWG exhibited improvements only in “pain” and “health change” items (P = 0.0001; effect size 0.13–0.94). Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG for “physical function” (P = 0.019) and “role limitations due to physical health” items (P = 0.035). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain, with greater improvements in the BWG (P = 0.0001; effect size 0.89). Only the BWG showed significant improvements in pain pressure thresholds (P < 0.05; effect size 0.70) and pain tolerance (P < 0.001; effect size 0.67). Both groups significantly increased their speed and time spent walking on the treadmill (BWG Δ=19.7 min and Δ=1.7 km/h; SWG Δ=16.7 min and Δ=1.1 km/h) and time outdoors (SWG ∆=38.2 min/week; BWG mean ∆=48.5 min/week) (P < 0.001). All clinical tests of pain were significantly less positive in the BWG at all time points (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Both walking programs benefited people with PPHP by alleviating pain and improving function and quality of life. Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG overall.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信