比较硅凝胶纤维敷料和藻酸盐敷料对腿部静脉溃疡愈合效果的非劣效性研究。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Long Zhang, Jin Yang, Haofu Wang, Yunmin Cai, Wenjun Zhao, Ruiping Dong, Dongyang Liu, Xingwu Lu
{"title":"比较硅凝胶纤维敷料和藻酸盐敷料对腿部静脉溃疡愈合效果的非劣效性研究。","authors":"Long Zhang, Jin Yang, Haofu Wang, Yunmin Cai, Wenjun Zhao, Ruiping Dong, Dongyang Liu, Xingwu Lu","doi":"10.25270/wmp.22091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Silica gel fiber (SGF) dressing is a novel patch for wound healing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of SGF dressing with alginate dressing in local treatment of venous leg ulcers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with venous leg ulcers who had undergone effective treatment of venous hypertension and debridement were randomized to receive wound care with either SGF dressing or alginate dressing for 4 weeks. Wounds were assessed weekly during the first 4 weeks and then every 2 weeks until the 8th week. The primary endpoint was the efficacy rate. Secondary endpoints included ulcer area reduction rate, healing rate, frequency of dressing changes, pain score, patient satisfaction, and treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 patients were enrolled, 67 treated with SGF and 63 with alginate dressing, and the efficacy rates were 89.6% (SGF group) and 84.1% (alginate group). SGF induced a higher \"no pain\" rate than alginate at week 2 (61.4% vs 43.5%) and week 3 (67.6% vs 53.1%), and a higher \"highly satisfied\" rate at week 4 (83.3% vs 78.8%) and week 8 (75% vs 59.1%). Markedly fewer dressing changes were required in the SGF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SGF dressing is non-inferior to alginate dressing in treating venous leg ulcers. It even substantially decreased the frequency of dressing changes when compared with alginate dressing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23741,"journal":{"name":"Wound management & prevention","volume":"69 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A non-inferiority study to compare the effect of silica gel fiber dressing with alginate dressing on healing of venous leg ulcers.\",\"authors\":\"Long Zhang, Jin Yang, Haofu Wang, Yunmin Cai, Wenjun Zhao, Ruiping Dong, Dongyang Liu, Xingwu Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.25270/wmp.22091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Silica gel fiber (SGF) dressing is a novel patch for wound healing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of SGF dressing with alginate dressing in local treatment of venous leg ulcers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with venous leg ulcers who had undergone effective treatment of venous hypertension and debridement were randomized to receive wound care with either SGF dressing or alginate dressing for 4 weeks. Wounds were assessed weekly during the first 4 weeks and then every 2 weeks until the 8th week. The primary endpoint was the efficacy rate. Secondary endpoints included ulcer area reduction rate, healing rate, frequency of dressing changes, pain score, patient satisfaction, and treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 patients were enrolled, 67 treated with SGF and 63 with alginate dressing, and the efficacy rates were 89.6% (SGF group) and 84.1% (alginate group). SGF induced a higher \\\"no pain\\\" rate than alginate at week 2 (61.4% vs 43.5%) and week 3 (67.6% vs 53.1%), and a higher \\\"highly satisfied\\\" rate at week 4 (83.3% vs 78.8%) and week 8 (75% vs 59.1%). Markedly fewer dressing changes were required in the SGF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SGF dressing is non-inferior to alginate dressing in treating venous leg ulcers. It even substantially decreased the frequency of dressing changes when compared with alginate dressing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wound management & prevention\",\"volume\":\"69 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wound management & prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25270/wmp.22091\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound management & prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/wmp.22091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:硅凝胶纤维(SGF)敷料是一种新型伤口愈合贴片:硅凝胶纤维(SGF)敷料是一种用于伤口愈合的新型敷料:比较硅凝胶纤维敷料与藻酸盐敷料在局部治疗腿部静脉溃疡中的有效性和安全性:方法:对静脉高压和清创治疗有效的腿部静脉溃疡患者进行随机分组,使用 SGF 敷料或海藻酸盐敷料进行伤口护理,为期 4 周。前 4 周每周对伤口进行一次评估,然后每两周评估一次,直到第 8 周。主要终点是有效率。次要终点包括溃疡面积缩小率、愈合率、换药频率、疼痛评分、患者满意度和治疗相关不良事件:共有 130 名患者接受了治疗,其中 67 人接受了 SGF 敷料治疗,63 人接受了藻酸盐敷料治疗,有效率分别为 89.6%(SGF 组)和 84.1%(藻酸盐组)。在第 2 周(61.4% 对 43.5%)和第 3 周(67.6% 对 53.1%),SGF 引起的 "无痛 "率高于藻酸盐,在第 4 周(83.3% 对 78.8%)和第 8 周(75% 对 59.1%),"非常满意 "率也高于藻酸盐。SGF组需要更换敷料的次数明显减少:结论:在治疗腿部静脉溃疡方面,SGF敷料的效果并不比藻酸盐敷料差。结论:与藻酸盐敷料相比,SGF敷料在治疗静脉性腿部溃疡方面并不逊色,甚至大大减少了换药次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A non-inferiority study to compare the effect of silica gel fiber dressing with alginate dressing on healing of venous leg ulcers.

Background: Silica gel fiber (SGF) dressing is a novel patch for wound healing.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of SGF dressing with alginate dressing in local treatment of venous leg ulcers.

Methods: Patients with venous leg ulcers who had undergone effective treatment of venous hypertension and debridement were randomized to receive wound care with either SGF dressing or alginate dressing for 4 weeks. Wounds were assessed weekly during the first 4 weeks and then every 2 weeks until the 8th week. The primary endpoint was the efficacy rate. Secondary endpoints included ulcer area reduction rate, healing rate, frequency of dressing changes, pain score, patient satisfaction, and treatment-related adverse events.

Results: A total of 130 patients were enrolled, 67 treated with SGF and 63 with alginate dressing, and the efficacy rates were 89.6% (SGF group) and 84.1% (alginate group). SGF induced a higher "no pain" rate than alginate at week 2 (61.4% vs 43.5%) and week 3 (67.6% vs 53.1%), and a higher "highly satisfied" rate at week 4 (83.3% vs 78.8%) and week 8 (75% vs 59.1%). Markedly fewer dressing changes were required in the SGF group.

Conclusions: SGF dressing is non-inferior to alginate dressing in treating venous leg ulcers. It even substantially decreased the frequency of dressing changes when compared with alginate dressing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wound management & prevention
Wound management & prevention Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信