澳大利亚农民为何不应捕杀毒蛇

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
R. Shine, N. Dunstan, J. Abraham, P. Mirtschin
{"title":"澳大利亚农民为何不应捕杀毒蛇","authors":"R. Shine,&nbsp;N. Dunstan,&nbsp;J. Abraham,&nbsp;P. Mirtschin","doi":"10.1111/acv.12925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many Australians who work outdoors (notably, farmers and graziers) routinely kill venomous snakes. We argue that this attitude is misguided and dangerous. Despite their fearsome reputation, venomous Australian snakes pose little risk to human health (snakes kill an average of less than three people per year in Australia). Also, snakes confer a substantial benefit by consuming agricultural pests such as rodents. We estimate the magnitude of that benefit with data on snake diets, feeding rates and abundances. The most valuable rodent-controllers are Brownsnakes (genus <i>Pseudonaja</i>), which are rodent-specialists as adults and are abundant in agroecosystems across much of Australia. We calculate that a free-living adult Eastern Brownsnake consumes at least 50 mice per year (probably twice that number), and that population densities of Brownsnakes in agricultural areas can exceed 100 per km<sup>2</sup>. Thus, Brownsnakes remove thousands of mice per square kilometre of farmland per year. That offtake plausibly reduces rodent densities because Brownsnakes take all age classes and both sexes of rodents by hunting in burrows. Tolerating Brownsnakes also would benefit the environment (e.g. less reliance on toxic chemicals) and the health of humans and domestic pets (fewer rodent-mediated diseases) and counter-intuitively, might reduce rates of snakebite (because many bites occur when a snake is attacked). In summary, a societal policy of coexisting with highly venomous snakes would confer multiple benefits to Australian farmers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 4","pages":"415-425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12925","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Australian farmers should not kill venomous snakes\",\"authors\":\"R. Shine,&nbsp;N. Dunstan,&nbsp;J. Abraham,&nbsp;P. Mirtschin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acv.12925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Many Australians who work outdoors (notably, farmers and graziers) routinely kill venomous snakes. We argue that this attitude is misguided and dangerous. Despite their fearsome reputation, venomous Australian snakes pose little risk to human health (snakes kill an average of less than three people per year in Australia). Also, snakes confer a substantial benefit by consuming agricultural pests such as rodents. We estimate the magnitude of that benefit with data on snake diets, feeding rates and abundances. The most valuable rodent-controllers are Brownsnakes (genus <i>Pseudonaja</i>), which are rodent-specialists as adults and are abundant in agroecosystems across much of Australia. We calculate that a free-living adult Eastern Brownsnake consumes at least 50 mice per year (probably twice that number), and that population densities of Brownsnakes in agricultural areas can exceed 100 per km<sup>2</sup>. Thus, Brownsnakes remove thousands of mice per square kilometre of farmland per year. That offtake plausibly reduces rodent densities because Brownsnakes take all age classes and both sexes of rodents by hunting in burrows. Tolerating Brownsnakes also would benefit the environment (e.g. less reliance on toxic chemicals) and the health of humans and domestic pets (fewer rodent-mediated diseases) and counter-intuitively, might reduce rates of snakebite (because many bites occur when a snake is attacked). In summary, a societal policy of coexisting with highly venomous snakes would confer multiple benefits to Australian farmers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Conservation\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"415-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12925\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acv.12925\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acv.12925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多从事户外工作的澳大利亚人(尤其是农民和放牧者)经常捕杀毒蛇。我们认为这种态度是错误的,也是危险的。尽管澳大利亚毒蛇声名狼藉,但它们对人类健康构成的风险很小(在澳大利亚,平均每年死于毒蛇的人数不到三人)。此外,蛇类通过捕食农业害虫(如啮齿动物)还能带来巨大的益处。我们通过蛇的食性、进食率和数量等数据来估算这种益处的大小。最有价值的啮齿动物控制者是棕蛇(Pseudonaja 属),这种蛇成年后专食啮齿动物,在澳大利亚大部分地区的农业生态系统中数量众多。根据我们的计算,一条自由生活的成年东方棕蛇每年至少要吃掉 50 只老鼠(可能是这个数字的两倍),而棕蛇在农业区的种群密度可以超过每平方公里 100 条。因此,棕蛇每年会在每平方公里的农田中捕食数千只老鼠。这种捕食可能会降低啮齿动物的密度,因为棕蛇在洞穴中捕食所有年龄段和性别的啮齿动物。容忍棕蛇还将有利于环境(如减少对有毒化学品的依赖)以及人类和家养宠物的健康(减少由啮齿动物传播的疾病),而且与直觉相反的是,可能会降低蛇咬伤的发生率(因为许多咬伤是在蛇受到攻击时发生的)。总之,与剧毒蛇共存的社会政策将为澳大利亚农民带来多重益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Why Australian farmers should not kill venomous snakes

Why Australian farmers should not kill venomous snakes

Why Australian farmers should not kill venomous snakes

Many Australians who work outdoors (notably, farmers and graziers) routinely kill venomous snakes. We argue that this attitude is misguided and dangerous. Despite their fearsome reputation, venomous Australian snakes pose little risk to human health (snakes kill an average of less than three people per year in Australia). Also, snakes confer a substantial benefit by consuming agricultural pests such as rodents. We estimate the magnitude of that benefit with data on snake diets, feeding rates and abundances. The most valuable rodent-controllers are Brownsnakes (genus Pseudonaja), which are rodent-specialists as adults and are abundant in agroecosystems across much of Australia. We calculate that a free-living adult Eastern Brownsnake consumes at least 50 mice per year (probably twice that number), and that population densities of Brownsnakes in agricultural areas can exceed 100 per km2. Thus, Brownsnakes remove thousands of mice per square kilometre of farmland per year. That offtake plausibly reduces rodent densities because Brownsnakes take all age classes and both sexes of rodents by hunting in burrows. Tolerating Brownsnakes also would benefit the environment (e.g. less reliance on toxic chemicals) and the health of humans and domestic pets (fewer rodent-mediated diseases) and counter-intuitively, might reduce rates of snakebite (because many bites occur when a snake is attacked). In summary, a societal policy of coexisting with highly venomous snakes would confer multiple benefits to Australian farmers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Conservation
Animal Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Conservation provides a forum for rapid publication of novel, peer-reviewed research into the conservation of animal species and their habitats. The focus is on rigorous quantitative studies of an empirical or theoretical nature, which may relate to populations, species or communities and their conservation. We encourage the submission of single-species papers that have clear broader implications for conservation of other species or systems. A central theme is to publish important new ideas of broad interest and with findings that advance the scientific basis of conservation. Subjects covered include population biology, epidemiology, evolutionary ecology, population genetics, biodiversity, biogeography, palaeobiology and conservation economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信