在 COVID-19 中突然转向远程保健:大型助产服务机构产前护理中远程医疗使用差异的回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Denise C. Smith CNM, PhD, E. Brie Thumm CNM, PhD, MBA, Jessica Anderson CNM, WHNP, DNP, Katherine Kissler CNM, PhD, Sean M. Reed CNS, PhD, Sophia M. Centi MPH, Alyse W. Staley MS, Teri L. Hernandez PhD, RN, Amy J. Barton PhD, RN
{"title":"在 COVID-19 中突然转向远程保健:大型助产服务机构产前护理中远程医疗使用差异的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Denise C. Smith CNM, PhD,&nbsp;E. Brie Thumm CNM, PhD, MBA,&nbsp;Jessica Anderson CNM, WHNP, DNP,&nbsp;Katherine Kissler CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Sean M. Reed CNS, PhD,&nbsp;Sophia M. Centi MPH,&nbsp;Alyse W. Staley MS,&nbsp;Teri L. Hernandez PhD, RN,&nbsp;Amy J. Barton PhD, RN","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created disruption in health care delivery, including a sudden transition to telehealth use in mid-March 2020. The purpose of this study was to examine changes in the mode of prenatal care visits and predictors of telehealth use (provider-patient messaging, telephone visits, and video visits) during the COVID-19 pandemic among those receiving care in a large, academic nurse-midwifery service.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of those enrolled for prenatal care in 2 nurse-midwifery clinics between 2019 and 2021 (n = 3172). Use outcomes included number and type of encounter: in-person and telehealth (primary outcome). Comparisons were made in frequency and types of encounters before and during COVID-19. A negative binomial regression was fit on the outcome of telehealth encounter count, with race/ethnicity, age, language, parity, hypertension, diabetes, and depression as predictors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>When comparing pre–COVID-19 (before March 2020) with during COVID-19 (after March 2020), overall encounters increased from 15.9 to 19.5 mean number of encounters per person (<i>P</i> &lt; .001). The increase was driven by telehealth encounters; there were no significant differences for in-person prenatal visit counts before and during the pandemic period. Direct patient-provider messaging was the most common type of telehealth encounter. Predictors of telehealth encounters included English as primary language and diagnoses of diabetes or depression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>No differences in the frequency of in-person prenatal care visits suggests that telehealth encounters led to more contact with midwives and did not replace in-person encounters. Spanish-speaking patients were least likely to use telehealth-delivered prenatal care during the pandemic; a small, but significant, proportion of patients had no or few telehealth encounters, and a significant proportion had high use of telehealth. Integration of telehealth in future delivery of prenatal care should consider questions of equity, patient and provider satisfaction, access, redundancies, and provider workload.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sudden Shift to Telehealth in COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Disparities in Use of Telehealth for Prenatal Care in a Large Midwifery Service\",\"authors\":\"Denise C. Smith CNM, PhD,&nbsp;E. Brie Thumm CNM, PhD, MBA,&nbsp;Jessica Anderson CNM, WHNP, DNP,&nbsp;Katherine Kissler CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Sean M. Reed CNS, PhD,&nbsp;Sophia M. Centi MPH,&nbsp;Alyse W. Staley MS,&nbsp;Teri L. Hernandez PhD, RN,&nbsp;Amy J. Barton PhD, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmwh.13601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created disruption in health care delivery, including a sudden transition to telehealth use in mid-March 2020. The purpose of this study was to examine changes in the mode of prenatal care visits and predictors of telehealth use (provider-patient messaging, telephone visits, and video visits) during the COVID-19 pandemic among those receiving care in a large, academic nurse-midwifery service.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of those enrolled for prenatal care in 2 nurse-midwifery clinics between 2019 and 2021 (n = 3172). Use outcomes included number and type of encounter: in-person and telehealth (primary outcome). Comparisons were made in frequency and types of encounters before and during COVID-19. A negative binomial regression was fit on the outcome of telehealth encounter count, with race/ethnicity, age, language, parity, hypertension, diabetes, and depression as predictors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>When comparing pre–COVID-19 (before March 2020) with during COVID-19 (after March 2020), overall encounters increased from 15.9 to 19.5 mean number of encounters per person (<i>P</i> &lt; .001). The increase was driven by telehealth encounters; there were no significant differences for in-person prenatal visit counts before and during the pandemic period. Direct patient-provider messaging was the most common type of telehealth encounter. Predictors of telehealth encounters included English as primary language and diagnoses of diabetes or depression.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>No differences in the frequency of in-person prenatal care visits suggests that telehealth encounters led to more contact with midwives and did not replace in-person encounters. Spanish-speaking patients were least likely to use telehealth-delivered prenatal care during the pandemic; a small, but significant, proportion of patients had no or few telehealth encounters, and a significant proportion had high use of telehealth. Integration of telehealth in future delivery of prenatal care should consider questions of equity, patient and provider satisfaction, access, redundancies, and provider workload.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13601\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行造成了医疗保健服务的中断,包括在 2020 年 3 月中旬突然过渡到远程医疗的使用。本研究旨在探讨在 COVID-19 大流行期间,大型学术性助产护士服务机构中接受护理者产前护理就诊模式的变化以及远程医疗使用(提供者与患者之间的信息传递、电话就诊和视频就诊)的预测因素:我们对 2019 年至 2021 年期间在 2 个助产护士诊所接受产前护理的人员(n = 3172)进行了一项回顾性队列研究。使用结果包括接诊次数和类型:亲自接诊和远程医疗(主要结果)。比较了 COVID-19 之前和期间的就诊次数和类型。对远程医疗就诊次数这一结果进行了负二项回归拟合,并将种族/民族、年龄、语言、准孕期、高血压、糖尿病和抑郁症作为预测因素:将 COVID-19 前(2020 年 3 月前)与 COVID-19 期间(2020 年 3 月后)相比,总体就诊次数从每人平均 15.9 次增至 19.5 次(P < .001)。增加的原因是远程医疗就诊次数的增加;大流行前和大流行期间的亲自产前就诊次数没有显著差异。患者与医疗服务提供者直接发送信息是最常见的远程医疗方式。远程医疗就诊的预测因素包括英语为主要语言以及糖尿病或抑郁症诊断:讨论:面对面产前保健就诊的频率没有差异,这表明远程保健就诊使患者与助产士有了更多的接触,并没有取代面对面就诊。在大流行期间,讲西班牙语的患者最不可能使用远程医疗提供的产前护理;有一小部分患者没有或很少使用远程医疗,但这一比例相当大,还有很大一部分患者大量使用远程医疗。在未来的产前护理中整合远程医疗应考虑公平性、患者和医疗服务提供者的满意度、可及性、冗余和医疗服务提供者的工作量等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sudden Shift to Telehealth in COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Disparities in Use of Telehealth for Prenatal Care in a Large Midwifery Service

Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created disruption in health care delivery, including a sudden transition to telehealth use in mid-March 2020. The purpose of this study was to examine changes in the mode of prenatal care visits and predictors of telehealth use (provider-patient messaging, telephone visits, and video visits) during the COVID-19 pandemic among those receiving care in a large, academic nurse-midwifery service.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of those enrolled for prenatal care in 2 nurse-midwifery clinics between 2019 and 2021 (n = 3172). Use outcomes included number and type of encounter: in-person and telehealth (primary outcome). Comparisons were made in frequency and types of encounters before and during COVID-19. A negative binomial regression was fit on the outcome of telehealth encounter count, with race/ethnicity, age, language, parity, hypertension, diabetes, and depression as predictors.

Results

When comparing pre–COVID-19 (before March 2020) with during COVID-19 (after March 2020), overall encounters increased from 15.9 to 19.5 mean number of encounters per person (P < .001). The increase was driven by telehealth encounters; there were no significant differences for in-person prenatal visit counts before and during the pandemic period. Direct patient-provider messaging was the most common type of telehealth encounter. Predictors of telehealth encounters included English as primary language and diagnoses of diabetes or depression.

Discussion

No differences in the frequency of in-person prenatal care visits suggests that telehealth encounters led to more contact with midwives and did not replace in-person encounters. Spanish-speaking patients were least likely to use telehealth-delivered prenatal care during the pandemic; a small, but significant, proportion of patients had no or few telehealth encounters, and a significant proportion had high use of telehealth. Integration of telehealth in future delivery of prenatal care should consider questions of equity, patient and provider satisfaction, access, redundancies, and provider workload.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信