心脏骤停和外伤复苏中幻影扫描的普遍性:可怕的真相

POCUS journal Pub Date : 2023-11-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16690
Zachary Boivin, Curtis Xu, Donias Doko, Meghan Kelly Herbst, Trent She
{"title":"心脏骤停和外伤复苏中幻影扫描的普遍性:可怕的真相","authors":"Zachary Boivin, Curtis Xu, Donias Doko, Meghan Kelly Herbst, Trent She","doi":"10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The prevalence of phantom scanning, or point of care ultrasound (POCUS) performed without saving images, has not been well studied. Phantom scanning can negatively affect patient care, reduce billed revenue, and can increase medicolegal liability. We sought to quantify and compare the prevalence of phantom scanning among emergency department (ED) cardiac arrests and trauma resuscitations. <b>Methods:</b> This was a single center, retrospective cohort study from July 1, 2019, to July 1, 2021, of all occurrences of POCUS examination documented on the resuscitation run sheet during cardiac arrest and trauma resuscitations. Two investigators reviewed the run sheets to screen for POCUS documentation. Instances where documentation was present were matched with saved images in the picture archiving and communication system. Instances where documentation was present but no images could be located were considered phantom scans. A two-tailed student's t test was utilized to compare the phantom scanning rate between cardiac arrest and trauma resuscitations. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1,862 patients were included in the study period, with 329 cardiac arrests and 401 trauma resuscitations having run sheet documentation of POCUS performance. The phantom scanning rate in cardiac arrests and trauma resuscitations was 70.5% (232/329) and 86.5% (347/401), respectively (p < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Phantom scanning is common in both cardiac arrests and trauma resuscitations in the ED at our institution, but is significantly higher in trauma resuscitations. Further research is needed to assess causes and develop potential solutions to reduce the high prevalence of phantom scanning.</p>","PeriodicalId":74470,"journal":{"name":"POCUS journal","volume":"8 2","pages":"217-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10721300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Phantom Scanning in Cardiac Arrest and Trauma Resuscitations: The Scary Truth.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Boivin, Curtis Xu, Donias Doko, Meghan Kelly Herbst, Trent She\",\"doi\":\"10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The prevalence of phantom scanning, or point of care ultrasound (POCUS) performed without saving images, has not been well studied. Phantom scanning can negatively affect patient care, reduce billed revenue, and can increase medicolegal liability. We sought to quantify and compare the prevalence of phantom scanning among emergency department (ED) cardiac arrests and trauma resuscitations. <b>Methods:</b> This was a single center, retrospective cohort study from July 1, 2019, to July 1, 2021, of all occurrences of POCUS examination documented on the resuscitation run sheet during cardiac arrest and trauma resuscitations. Two investigators reviewed the run sheets to screen for POCUS documentation. Instances where documentation was present were matched with saved images in the picture archiving and communication system. Instances where documentation was present but no images could be located were considered phantom scans. A two-tailed student's t test was utilized to compare the phantom scanning rate between cardiac arrest and trauma resuscitations. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1,862 patients were included in the study period, with 329 cardiac arrests and 401 trauma resuscitations having run sheet documentation of POCUS performance. The phantom scanning rate in cardiac arrests and trauma resuscitations was 70.5% (232/329) and 86.5% (347/401), respectively (p < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Phantom scanning is common in both cardiac arrests and trauma resuscitations in the ED at our institution, but is significantly higher in trauma resuscitations. Further research is needed to assess causes and develop potential solutions to reduce the high prevalence of phantom scanning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POCUS journal\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"217-222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10721300/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POCUS journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POCUS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前还没有对幻影扫描或未保存图像的护理点超声检查 (POCUS) 的普遍性进行充分研究。幻影扫描会对患者护理产生负面影响,减少收费收入,并增加医疗法律责任。我们试图量化和比较急诊科(ED)心脏骤停和创伤复苏中的幻影扫描发生率。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,研究时间为 2019 年 7 月 1 日至 2021 年 7 月 1 日,研究对象为心脏骤停和创伤复苏期间复苏记录单上记录的所有 POCUS 检查。两名调查人员审查了流程单,以筛选是否有 POCUS 记录。将有记录的情况与图片存档和通信系统中保存的图像进行比对。有记录但找不到图像的情况被视为幻影扫描。使用双尾学生 t 检验来比较心脏骤停复苏和创伤复苏的幻影扫描率。结果:研究期间共纳入了 1,862 名患者,其中 329 名心脏骤停患者和 401 名外伤复苏患者的 POCUS 表现有记录。心脏骤停和创伤复苏的幻影扫描率分别为 70.5%(232/329)和 86.5%(347/401)(p < 0.001)。结论:在我院急诊室的心脏骤停和创伤复苏中,幻影扫描都很常见,但创伤复苏中的幻影扫描率明显更高。需要进一步开展研究,评估原因并制定可能的解决方案,以降低幻影扫描的高发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Phantom Scanning in Cardiac Arrest and Trauma Resuscitations: The Scary Truth.

Background: The prevalence of phantom scanning, or point of care ultrasound (POCUS) performed without saving images, has not been well studied. Phantom scanning can negatively affect patient care, reduce billed revenue, and can increase medicolegal liability. We sought to quantify and compare the prevalence of phantom scanning among emergency department (ED) cardiac arrests and trauma resuscitations. Methods: This was a single center, retrospective cohort study from July 1, 2019, to July 1, 2021, of all occurrences of POCUS examination documented on the resuscitation run sheet during cardiac arrest and trauma resuscitations. Two investigators reviewed the run sheets to screen for POCUS documentation. Instances where documentation was present were matched with saved images in the picture archiving and communication system. Instances where documentation was present but no images could be located were considered phantom scans. A two-tailed student's t test was utilized to compare the phantom scanning rate between cardiac arrest and trauma resuscitations. Results: A total of 1,862 patients were included in the study period, with 329 cardiac arrests and 401 trauma resuscitations having run sheet documentation of POCUS performance. The phantom scanning rate in cardiac arrests and trauma resuscitations was 70.5% (232/329) and 86.5% (347/401), respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Phantom scanning is common in both cardiac arrests and trauma resuscitations in the ED at our institution, but is significantly higher in trauma resuscitations. Further research is needed to assess causes and develop potential solutions to reduce the high prevalence of phantom scanning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信