一家安全网医院在肺癌临床试验讨论和注册方面存在的差异。

Harshitha Dudipala, Laura Burns, Chinmay T Jani, Amr Radwan, Omar Al Omari, Mohini Patel, Seyda Kilic, Jenny Zhao, Kimberley Mak, Kei Suzuki, Umit Tapan
{"title":"一家安全网医院在肺癌临床试验讨论和注册方面存在的差异。","authors":"Harshitha Dudipala, Laura Burns, Chinmay T Jani, Amr Radwan, Omar Al Omari, Mohini Patel, Seyda Kilic, Jenny Zhao, Kimberley Mak, Kei Suzuki, Umit Tapan","doi":"10.1177/2752535X231221394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, less than 5% of all adult cancer patients enroll in clinical trials. Few studies explore participation in cancer clinical trials at safety net hospitals, which disproportionately care for minoritized, low-income, uninsured, and underinsured populations. Our study aims to investigate disparities in clinical trial discussions and enrollment among lung cancer patients at Boston Medical Center, the largest safety net hospital in New England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 1121 patients diagnosed with lung cancer between January 2015 and December 2020. Electronic Medical Records (EMR) were queried, and patients were categorized into three groups: (1) clinical trial discussed and the patient enrolled, (2) clinical trial discussed but the patient not enrolled, and (3) clinical trial not discussed. Sociodemographic variables such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, city, primary language, median household income, medical insurance type, and education level were also collected. Chi-squared,<i>t</i> test, and multivariate regression analysis was done using SPSS version 26.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1121 patients, clinical trials were discussed in 141 patients (12.6%), of which 22 (15.6%) were enrolled. Clinical trial discussions were conducted more with younger patients (68.19 vs 71.37, <i>p</i> = .001), but on multivariate analysis there was no significant difference (OR = 1.023; 95% CI 0.998-1.048; <i>p</i> = .068). There was no significant difference in clinical trial discussion or enrollment between the other sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional study of barriers to cancer clinical trial discussion and enrollment at safety net institutions can serve as a prerequisite to ameliorating racial disparities observed on a national scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"2752535X231221394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Lung Cancer Clinical Trial Discussion and Enrollment at a Safety Net Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Harshitha Dudipala, Laura Burns, Chinmay T Jani, Amr Radwan, Omar Al Omari, Mohini Patel, Seyda Kilic, Jenny Zhao, Kimberley Mak, Kei Suzuki, Umit Tapan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2752535X231221394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, less than 5% of all adult cancer patients enroll in clinical trials. Few studies explore participation in cancer clinical trials at safety net hospitals, which disproportionately care for minoritized, low-income, uninsured, and underinsured populations. Our study aims to investigate disparities in clinical trial discussions and enrollment among lung cancer patients at Boston Medical Center, the largest safety net hospital in New England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 1121 patients diagnosed with lung cancer between January 2015 and December 2020. Electronic Medical Records (EMR) were queried, and patients were categorized into three groups: (1) clinical trial discussed and the patient enrolled, (2) clinical trial discussed but the patient not enrolled, and (3) clinical trial not discussed. Sociodemographic variables such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, city, primary language, median household income, medical insurance type, and education level were also collected. Chi-squared,<i>t</i> test, and multivariate regression analysis was done using SPSS version 26.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1121 patients, clinical trials were discussed in 141 patients (12.6%), of which 22 (15.6%) were enrolled. Clinical trial discussions were conducted more with younger patients (68.19 vs 71.37, <i>p</i> = .001), but on multivariate analysis there was no significant difference (OR = 1.023; 95% CI 0.998-1.048; <i>p</i> = .068). There was no significant difference in clinical trial discussion or enrollment between the other sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional study of barriers to cancer clinical trial discussion and enrollment at safety net institutions can serve as a prerequisite to ameliorating racial disparities observed on a national scale.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community health equity research & policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2752535X231221394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community health equity research & policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X231221394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X231221394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,只有不到 5%的成年癌症患者参加了临床试验。很少有研究探讨安全网医院参与癌症临床试验的情况,而这些医院主要为少数族裔、低收入、无保险和保险不足的人群提供医疗服务。我们的研究旨在调查新英格兰地区最大的安全网医院--波士顿医疗中心的肺癌患者在临床试验讨论和注册方面的差异:我们纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间诊断为肺癌的 1121 名患者。我们查询了电子病历(EMR),并将患者分为三组:(1)讨论过临床试验并注册的患者;(2)讨论过临床试验但未注册的患者;(3)未讨论过临床试验的患者。此外,还收集了年龄、性别、种族、民族、城市、主要语言、家庭收入中位数、医疗保险类型和教育程度等社会人口学变量。使用 SPSS 26.0 版进行了卡方检验、t 检验和多变量回归分析:在 1121 名患者中,有 141 名患者(12.6%)讨论过临床试验,其中 22 名(15.6%)入选。临床试验讨论更多针对年轻患者(68.19 vs 71.37,p = .001),但在多变量分析中没有显著差异(OR = 1.023; 95% CI 0.998-1.048; p = .068)。其他社会人口因素在临床试验讨论或注册方面没有明显差异:结论:对安全网机构中癌症临床试验讨论和注册的障碍进行更多研究,可作为改善全国范围内观察到的种族差异的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in Lung Cancer Clinical Trial Discussion and Enrollment at a Safety Net Hospital.

Background: In the United States, less than 5% of all adult cancer patients enroll in clinical trials. Few studies explore participation in cancer clinical trials at safety net hospitals, which disproportionately care for minoritized, low-income, uninsured, and underinsured populations. Our study aims to investigate disparities in clinical trial discussions and enrollment among lung cancer patients at Boston Medical Center, the largest safety net hospital in New England.

Methods: We included 1121 patients diagnosed with lung cancer between January 2015 and December 2020. Electronic Medical Records (EMR) were queried, and patients were categorized into three groups: (1) clinical trial discussed and the patient enrolled, (2) clinical trial discussed but the patient not enrolled, and (3) clinical trial not discussed. Sociodemographic variables such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, city, primary language, median household income, medical insurance type, and education level were also collected. Chi-squared,t test, and multivariate regression analysis was done using SPSS version 26.0.

Results: Of the 1121 patients, clinical trials were discussed in 141 patients (12.6%), of which 22 (15.6%) were enrolled. Clinical trial discussions were conducted more with younger patients (68.19 vs 71.37, p = .001), but on multivariate analysis there was no significant difference (OR = 1.023; 95% CI 0.998-1.048; p = .068). There was no significant difference in clinical trial discussion or enrollment between the other sociodemographic factors.

Conclusion: Additional study of barriers to cancer clinical trial discussion and enrollment at safety net institutions can serve as a prerequisite to ameliorating racial disparities observed on a national scale.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信