医院急诊科急性心力衰竭患者的尿导管检查:与预后相关的因素。

Alberto Domínguez-Rodríguez, Néstor Báez-Ferrer, Guillermo Burillo-Putze, Virginia Domínguez-González, Pedro Abreu-González, Daniel Hernández-Vaquero
{"title":"医院急诊科急性心力衰竭患者的尿导管检查:与预后相关的因素。","authors":"Alberto Domínguez-Rodríguez, Néstor Báez-Ferrer, Guillermo Burillo-Putze, Virginia Domínguez-González, Pedro Abreu-González, Daniel Hernández-Vaquero","doi":"10.55633/s3me/E04.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze whether urinary catheterization in a hospital emergency department (ED) affects short-term prognosis in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We prospectively recorded baseline and other clinical data in a consecutive cohort of ED patients treated for AHF. Crude and adjusted associations were calculated between catheterization and a primary composite outcome (30-day readmission for AHF and/or death) and secondary outcomes (in-hospital mortality, urinary tract infection [UTI], and duration of hospital stay.).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine hundred ninety-one patients were admitted for AHF. The mean (SD) age was 66 (10.5) years; 71% were women. Catheterization was required for 29.2% in the ED. The primary composite outcome was observed in 7.7% of the patients who were not catheterized and 12.8% of the catheterized patients (P = .02). In-hospital mortality occurred in 5.9% and 9.7% of non-catheterized and catheterized patients, respectively (P = .04), and UTIs occurred in 19.1% and 26.6% (P = .01). Twelve of the non-catheterized patients (1.7%) were readmitted for AHF (vs 11 (3.8%) of the catheterized patients (P = .06), and there were no differences between the groups in hospital stay (11 vs 10.9 days, P = .78). In the adjusted analysis of associations between catheterization and the primary outcome the odds and hazard ratios (OR and HR, respectively) were OR, 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1-2.7) (P = .02) and HR, 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.5) (P = .03). For secondary outcomes, significant associations emerged between catheterization and UTIs (OR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1-2.2]; P = .008) and readmission for AHF (OR, 2.9 [95% CI, 1.2-7.3]; P = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine insertion of a urinary catheter in patients with AHF in the ED is associated with worse 30-day clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93987,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":"35 6","pages":"409-414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urinary catheterization of patients with acute heart failure in a hospital emergency department: a factor associated with prognosis.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Domínguez-Rodríguez, Néstor Báez-Ferrer, Guillermo Burillo-Putze, Virginia Domínguez-González, Pedro Abreu-González, Daniel Hernández-Vaquero\",\"doi\":\"10.55633/s3me/E04.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze whether urinary catheterization in a hospital emergency department (ED) affects short-term prognosis in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We prospectively recorded baseline and other clinical data in a consecutive cohort of ED patients treated for AHF. Crude and adjusted associations were calculated between catheterization and a primary composite outcome (30-day readmission for AHF and/or death) and secondary outcomes (in-hospital mortality, urinary tract infection [UTI], and duration of hospital stay.).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine hundred ninety-one patients were admitted for AHF. The mean (SD) age was 66 (10.5) years; 71% were women. Catheterization was required for 29.2% in the ED. The primary composite outcome was observed in 7.7% of the patients who were not catheterized and 12.8% of the catheterized patients (P = .02). In-hospital mortality occurred in 5.9% and 9.7% of non-catheterized and catheterized patients, respectively (P = .04), and UTIs occurred in 19.1% and 26.6% (P = .01). Twelve of the non-catheterized patients (1.7%) were readmitted for AHF (vs 11 (3.8%) of the catheterized patients (P = .06), and there were no differences between the groups in hospital stay (11 vs 10.9 days, P = .78). In the adjusted analysis of associations between catheterization and the primary outcome the odds and hazard ratios (OR and HR, respectively) were OR, 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1-2.7) (P = .02) and HR, 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.5) (P = .03). For secondary outcomes, significant associations emerged between catheterization and UTIs (OR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1-2.2]; P = .008) and readmission for AHF (OR, 2.9 [95% CI, 1.2-7.3]; P = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine insertion of a urinary catheter in patients with AHF in the ED is associated with worse 30-day clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias\",\"volume\":\"35 6\",\"pages\":\"409-414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55633/s3me/E04.2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55633/s3me/E04.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析医院急诊科(ED)的尿导管检查是否会影响急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的短期预后:我们前瞻性地记录了一批连续接受急诊科治疗的急性心力衰竭患者的基线和其他临床数据。计算了导管插入术与主要综合结果(30 天内因急性心力衰竭再次入院和/或死亡)和次要结果(院内死亡率、尿路感染 [UTI] 和住院时间)之间的粗略关联和调整关联:结果:991 名患者因急性肾功能衰竭入院。平均(标清)年龄为 66(10.5)岁,71% 为女性。29.2%的患者需要在急诊室接受导管插入术。7.7%的未接受导管插入术的患者和12.8%的接受导管插入术的患者观察到了主要复合结果(P = .02)。未导管插入和导管插入患者的院内死亡率分别为 5.9% 和 9.7%(P = .04),UTI 发生率分别为 19.1% 和 26.6%(P = .01)。非导管插入患者中有 12 人(1.7%)因 AHF 再次入院(导管插入患者中有 11 人(3.8%),P = .06),两组患者的住院时间没有差异(11 天 vs 10.9 天,P = .78)。在导管插入术与主要结果的相关性调整分析中,几率和危险比(OR 和 HR)分别为 OR,1.7(95% CI,1.1-2.7)(P = .02)和 HR,1.6(95% CI,1.1-2.5)(P = .03)。在次要结果中,导尿与UTIs(OR,1.8 [95% CI,1.1-2.2];P = .008)和AHF再入院(OR,2.9 [95% CI,1.2-7.3];P = .02)之间存在明显关联:结论:在急诊室为 AHF 患者常规插入导尿管会导致患者 30 天临床预后较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urinary catheterization of patients with acute heart failure in a hospital emergency department: a factor associated with prognosis.

Objectives: To analyze whether urinary catheterization in a hospital emergency department (ED) affects short-term prognosis in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).

Material and methods: We prospectively recorded baseline and other clinical data in a consecutive cohort of ED patients treated for AHF. Crude and adjusted associations were calculated between catheterization and a primary composite outcome (30-day readmission for AHF and/or death) and secondary outcomes (in-hospital mortality, urinary tract infection [UTI], and duration of hospital stay.).

Results: Nine hundred ninety-one patients were admitted for AHF. The mean (SD) age was 66 (10.5) years; 71% were women. Catheterization was required for 29.2% in the ED. The primary composite outcome was observed in 7.7% of the patients who were not catheterized and 12.8% of the catheterized patients (P = .02). In-hospital mortality occurred in 5.9% and 9.7% of non-catheterized and catheterized patients, respectively (P = .04), and UTIs occurred in 19.1% and 26.6% (P = .01). Twelve of the non-catheterized patients (1.7%) were readmitted for AHF (vs 11 (3.8%) of the catheterized patients (P = .06), and there were no differences between the groups in hospital stay (11 vs 10.9 days, P = .78). In the adjusted analysis of associations between catheterization and the primary outcome the odds and hazard ratios (OR and HR, respectively) were OR, 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1-2.7) (P = .02) and HR, 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.5) (P = .03). For secondary outcomes, significant associations emerged between catheterization and UTIs (OR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1-2.2]; P = .008) and readmission for AHF (OR, 2.9 [95% CI, 1.2-7.3]; P = .02).

Conclusion: Routine insertion of a urinary catheter in patients with AHF in the ED is associated with worse 30-day clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信