梅尼科-托基奥的生态伦理贡献--欧洲生物伦理学被遗忘的先驱。

IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Iva Rincic, Amir Muzur, Cristina Richie
{"title":"梅尼科-托基奥的生态伦理贡献--欧洲生物伦理学被遗忘的先驱。","authors":"Iva Rincic, Amir Muzur, Cristina Richie","doi":"10.1186/s13010-023-00145-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 1926, Fritz Jahr described bio-ethics (German: bio-ethik) as \"the assumption of moral obligations not only towards humans, but towards all forms of life.\" Jahr summarized his philosophy by declaring, \"Respect every living being on principle as an end in itself and treat it, if possible, as such!.\" Bioethics was thus originally an ethical system concerned with the \"problems of interference with other living beings… and generally everything related to the balance of the ecosystem\" according to the 1978 Encyclopedia of Bioethics. This definition was predicated on the work of Fritz Jahr, Menico Torchio, and Van Rensselaer Potter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In order to proceed with depthful analysis of the origin and major bioethical flare up, we will use critical analysis of existing literature, followed by a study trip to relevant bioethical localities (collecting photo and other documentations regarding Menico Torchio).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While Jahr and Potter are typically given intellectual credit for developing the field of bioethics, the eco-ethical contributions of Menico Torchio have been forgotten.This article will first trace the origins of \"bioethics\" - now commonly bifurcated into \"biomedical ethics\" and \"environmental bioethics.\" The former was developed by Tom Beauchamp from the Philosophy Department and James Childress of the Religious Studies department at Georgetown University and is based on principlism, with a narrow focus on medical settings. The latter addresses the environmental impact of the medical industry and climate change health hazards. Second, we will present a panorama of Torchio's significant intellectual contribution to bioethics. Menico Torchio's concept of bioethics synthesized work of both Jahr and Potter, advocating \"the need to expand our ethical obligations and embrace the most developed groups of animals, not only physically but also psychologically.\" Third, we will reflect on the lasting legacy of \"bioethics\" on biomedical and environmental bioethics today. Thematic elements such as interconnectedness of planetary health and human health, dedication to living in harmony with nature, and emphasis on systems and symbiosis remain unchanged from the legacy of Tochio onward.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our conclusion will underscore the necessity of understanding the connections between planetary, environmental, and human health.</p>","PeriodicalId":56062,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10731757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The eco-ethical contribution of Menico Torchio - a forgotten pioneer of European Bioethics.\",\"authors\":\"Iva Rincic, Amir Muzur, Cristina Richie\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13010-023-00145-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 1926, Fritz Jahr described bio-ethics (German: bio-ethik) as \\\"the assumption of moral obligations not only towards humans, but towards all forms of life.\\\" Jahr summarized his philosophy by declaring, \\\"Respect every living being on principle as an end in itself and treat it, if possible, as such!.\\\" Bioethics was thus originally an ethical system concerned with the \\\"problems of interference with other living beings… and generally everything related to the balance of the ecosystem\\\" according to the 1978 Encyclopedia of Bioethics. This definition was predicated on the work of Fritz Jahr, Menico Torchio, and Van Rensselaer Potter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In order to proceed with depthful analysis of the origin and major bioethical flare up, we will use critical analysis of existing literature, followed by a study trip to relevant bioethical localities (collecting photo and other documentations regarding Menico Torchio).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While Jahr and Potter are typically given intellectual credit for developing the field of bioethics, the eco-ethical contributions of Menico Torchio have been forgotten.This article will first trace the origins of \\\"bioethics\\\" - now commonly bifurcated into \\\"biomedical ethics\\\" and \\\"environmental bioethics.\\\" The former was developed by Tom Beauchamp from the Philosophy Department and James Childress of the Religious Studies department at Georgetown University and is based on principlism, with a narrow focus on medical settings. The latter addresses the environmental impact of the medical industry and climate change health hazards. Second, we will present a panorama of Torchio's significant intellectual contribution to bioethics. Menico Torchio's concept of bioethics synthesized work of both Jahr and Potter, advocating \\\"the need to expand our ethical obligations and embrace the most developed groups of animals, not only physically but also psychologically.\\\" Third, we will reflect on the lasting legacy of \\\"bioethics\\\" on biomedical and environmental bioethics today. Thematic elements such as interconnectedness of planetary health and human health, dedication to living in harmony with nature, and emphasis on systems and symbiosis remain unchanged from the legacy of Tochio onward.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our conclusion will underscore the necessity of understanding the connections between planetary, environmental, and human health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10731757/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00145-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00145-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:1926 年,弗里茨-雅尔(Fritz Jahr)将生物伦理学(德语:bio-ethik)描述为 "不仅对人类,而且对所有生命形式承担道德义务"。雅尔在总结自己的哲学时宣称:"原则上尊重每一个生命,将其本身视为目的,并尽可能将其作为目的对待!"因此,根据 1978 年的《生物伦理学百科全书》,生物伦理学最初是一个伦理体系,关注的是 "对其他生物的干扰问题......以及与生态系统平衡有关的一切问题"。这一定义是根据弗里茨-雅尔、梅尼科-托基奥和范伦斯勒-波特的研究成果得出的:为了深入分析生物伦理学的起源和主要爆发点,我们将对现有文献进行批判性分析,然后到相关的生物伦理学地区进行考察(收集有关梅尼科-托基奥的照片和其他文献资料):本文将首先追溯 "生物伦理学 "的起源--现在通常分为 "生物医学伦理学 "和 "环境生物伦理学"。前者由乔治敦大学哲学系的汤姆-博尚普和宗教研究系的詹姆斯-柴尔德里斯提出,以原则主义为基础,狭义地关注医疗环境。后者涉及医疗行业对环境的影响和气候变化对健康的危害。其次,我们将介绍托尔奇奥对生命伦理学的重要思想贡献。梅尼科-托尔奇奥的生命伦理学概念综合了亚尔和波特的研究成果,主张 "有必要扩大我们的伦理义务,不仅在生理上,而且在心理上,都要包容最发达的动物群体"。第三,我们将思考 "生物伦理学 "对当今生物医学和环境生物伦理学的持久影响。地球健康与人类健康相互关联、致力于与自然和谐共处、强调系统和共生等主题元素从托希奥的遗产中一直延续至今:我们的结论将强调理解地球、环境和人类健康之间联系的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The eco-ethical contribution of Menico Torchio - a forgotten pioneer of European Bioethics.

Background: In 1926, Fritz Jahr described bio-ethics (German: bio-ethik) as "the assumption of moral obligations not only towards humans, but towards all forms of life." Jahr summarized his philosophy by declaring, "Respect every living being on principle as an end in itself and treat it, if possible, as such!." Bioethics was thus originally an ethical system concerned with the "problems of interference with other living beings… and generally everything related to the balance of the ecosystem" according to the 1978 Encyclopedia of Bioethics. This definition was predicated on the work of Fritz Jahr, Menico Torchio, and Van Rensselaer Potter.

Methods: In order to proceed with depthful analysis of the origin and major bioethical flare up, we will use critical analysis of existing literature, followed by a study trip to relevant bioethical localities (collecting photo and other documentations regarding Menico Torchio).

Results: While Jahr and Potter are typically given intellectual credit for developing the field of bioethics, the eco-ethical contributions of Menico Torchio have been forgotten.This article will first trace the origins of "bioethics" - now commonly bifurcated into "biomedical ethics" and "environmental bioethics." The former was developed by Tom Beauchamp from the Philosophy Department and James Childress of the Religious Studies department at Georgetown University and is based on principlism, with a narrow focus on medical settings. The latter addresses the environmental impact of the medical industry and climate change health hazards. Second, we will present a panorama of Torchio's significant intellectual contribution to bioethics. Menico Torchio's concept of bioethics synthesized work of both Jahr and Potter, advocating "the need to expand our ethical obligations and embrace the most developed groups of animals, not only physically but also psychologically." Third, we will reflect on the lasting legacy of "bioethics" on biomedical and environmental bioethics today. Thematic elements such as interconnectedness of planetary health and human health, dedication to living in harmony with nature, and emphasis on systems and symbiosis remain unchanged from the legacy of Tochio onward.

Conclusion: Our conclusion will underscore the necessity of understanding the connections between planetary, environmental, and human health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine
Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine considers articles on the philosophy of medicine and biology, and on ethical aspects of clinical practice and research. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of the philosophy of medicine and biology, and the ethical aspects of clinical practice and research. It also considers papers at the intersection of medicine and humanities, including the history of medicine, that are relevant to contemporary philosophy of medicine and bioethics. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine is the official publication of the Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics at Georgetown University Medical Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信