探索远程医疗使用的多维度途径和偏好。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2023-12-08 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2023.0049
Kristin Pullyblank, Melissa Scribani, Nicole Krupa, Amanda Chapman, Megan Kern, Wendy Brunner
{"title":"探索远程医疗使用的多维度途径和偏好。","authors":"Kristin Pullyblank, Melissa Scribani, Nicole Krupa, Amanda Chapman, Megan Kern, Wendy Brunner","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2023.0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the pandemic, telehealth became critically important in care provision. Yet, research exposed the inequities facing various groups of people in terms of accessing telehealth. The purpose of this analysis was to examine the various dimensions of access that impact a person's ability to use and preference for telehealth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a mixed-methods approach framed by Levesque's Access to Health care model. In August, 2021, a stratified random sample of 500 patients of an integrated rural health care network was invited to participate in a survey designed to capture familiarity with, use of, and preference for digital technologies in general as well as with telehealth. In addition, key informant interviews were conducted between January 2022 and June 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' willingness to use telehealth was influenced by multiple dimensions of access, including approachability of the resource, acceptability, availability, affordability, and appropriateness. Clinician beliefs and attitudes as well as health care system policies affected how a patient perceived, sought, reached, and engaged with telehealth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access is a dynamic, multifaceted concept that is influenced by individual-, organization-, and systemic-level factors. Looking beyond patient determinants and examining different dimensions of access is important to better facilitate implementation and sustainment of telehealth.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"348-358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10719637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Multiple Dimensions of Access to and Preferences for Telehealth Use.\",\"authors\":\"Kristin Pullyblank, Melissa Scribani, Nicole Krupa, Amanda Chapman, Megan Kern, Wendy Brunner\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmr.2023.0049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the pandemic, telehealth became critically important in care provision. Yet, research exposed the inequities facing various groups of people in terms of accessing telehealth. The purpose of this analysis was to examine the various dimensions of access that impact a person's ability to use and preference for telehealth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a mixed-methods approach framed by Levesque's Access to Health care model. In August, 2021, a stratified random sample of 500 patients of an integrated rural health care network was invited to participate in a survey designed to capture familiarity with, use of, and preference for digital technologies in general as well as with telehealth. In addition, key informant interviews were conducted between January 2022 and June 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' willingness to use telehealth was influenced by multiple dimensions of access, including approachability of the resource, acceptability, availability, affordability, and appropriateness. Clinician beliefs and attitudes as well as health care system policies affected how a patient perceived, sought, reached, and engaged with telehealth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access is a dynamic, multifaceted concept that is influenced by individual-, organization-, and systemic-level factors. Looking beyond patient determinants and examining different dimensions of access is important to better facilitate implementation and sustainment of telehealth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"348-358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10719637/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:在大流行病期间,远程保健在提供护理方面变得至关重要。然而,研究揭示了不同人群在使用远程医疗方面所面临的不平等。本分析的目的是研究影响人们使用远程医疗的能力和偏好的各个层面:我们采用了以 Levesque 的 "获取医疗保健 "模式为框架的混合方法。2021 年 8 月,我们邀请了一个综合农村医疗保健网络的 500 名患者参加一项分层随机抽样调查,旨在了解他们对数字技术以及远程医疗的总体熟悉程度、使用情况和偏好。此外,还在 2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间对关键信息提供者进行了访谈:结果:患者使用远程医疗的意愿受到多方面因素的影响,包括资源的可接近性、可接受性、可用性、可负担性和适当性。临床医生的信念和态度以及医疗保健系统的政策影响着患者如何看待、寻求、接触和参与远程医疗:获取是一个动态的、多层面的概念,受到个人、组织和系统层面因素的影响。超越患者的决定因素并研究获取的不同层面对于更好地促进远程医疗的实施和持续发展非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Multiple Dimensions of Access to and Preferences for Telehealth Use.

Introduction: During the pandemic, telehealth became critically important in care provision. Yet, research exposed the inequities facing various groups of people in terms of accessing telehealth. The purpose of this analysis was to examine the various dimensions of access that impact a person's ability to use and preference for telehealth.

Methods: We used a mixed-methods approach framed by Levesque's Access to Health care model. In August, 2021, a stratified random sample of 500 patients of an integrated rural health care network was invited to participate in a survey designed to capture familiarity with, use of, and preference for digital technologies in general as well as with telehealth. In addition, key informant interviews were conducted between January 2022 and June 2022.

Results: Patients' willingness to use telehealth was influenced by multiple dimensions of access, including approachability of the resource, acceptability, availability, affordability, and appropriateness. Clinician beliefs and attitudes as well as health care system policies affected how a patient perceived, sought, reached, and engaged with telehealth.

Conclusions: Access is a dynamic, multifaceted concept that is influenced by individual-, organization-, and systemic-level factors. Looking beyond patient determinants and examining different dimensions of access is important to better facilitate implementation and sustainment of telehealth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信