通过在线电子问卷和物理电子问卷收集骨科患者临床数据的有效性对比分析。

IF 0.5 4区医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS

Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2023-12-18 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220233105e268380

Andre Vitor Kerber Cavalcanti Lemos, Lucas Plens DE Britto Costa, Eduardo Souza Maciel, Nacime Salomão Barbachan Mansur, Moises Cohen

{"title":"通过在线电子问卷和物理电子问卷收集骨科患者临床数据的有效性对比分析。","authors":"Andre Vitor Kerber Cavalcanti Lemos, Lucas Plens DE Britto Costa, Eduardo Souza Maciel, Nacime Salomão Barbachan Mansur, Moises Cohen","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220233105e268380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The collection of clinical data is an essential step for the development of any scientific research. Online digital data collection can optimize this step.Objective: To compare the response rate and the accuracy of the clinical data collection date through the online and physical digital questionnaire in orthopedic patients.Methods: Comparative study, level III of evidence, with forty patients who had ankle sprains were evaluated, followed up for a period of 12 weeks with the application of physical and digital Visual Analogue Scale, Foot Function Index and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool questionnaires, and data were collected about the moment of collection of each questionnaire.Results: We obtained a response rate of 83.3% in the digital collection group and 60% in the physical collection group (p < 0.05), and the response rate in the digital collection group was higher at all times of collection (3, 6 and 12 weeks). Analysis of the time of collection shows greater variability in the larger physical collection group at all times of the study (2.8 vs 1.5; 4.0 vs 2.4; 8.6 vs 1.5).Conclusion: Digital data collection is effective for obtaining clinical data in patients with ankle sprains. Level of Evidence III, Comparative, Prospective, Longitudinal Study in Parallel Groups.","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10726704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLINICAL DATA COLLECTION THROUGH ONLINE AND PHYSICAL ELECTRONIC QUESTIONNAIRE IN ORTHOPEDIC PATIENTS.\",\"authors\":\"Andre Vitor Kerber Cavalcanti Lemos, Lucas Plens DE Britto Costa, Eduardo Souza Maciel, Nacime Salomão Barbachan Mansur, Moises Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1413-785220233105e268380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The collection of clinical data is an essential step for the development of any scientific research. Online digital data collection can optimize this step.Objective: To compare the response rate and the accuracy of the clinical data collection date through the online and physical digital questionnaire in orthopedic patients.Methods: Comparative study, level III of evidence, with forty patients who had ankle sprains were evaluated, followed up for a period of 12 weeks with the application of physical and digital Visual Analogue Scale, Foot Function Index and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool questionnaires, and data were collected about the moment of collection of each questionnaire.Results: We obtained a response rate of 83.3% in the digital collection group and 60% in the physical collection group (p < 0.05), and the response rate in the digital collection group was higher at all times of collection (3, 6 and 12 weeks). Analysis of the time of collection shows greater variability in the larger physical collection group at all times of the study (2.8 vs 1.5; 4.0 vs 2.4; 8.6 vs 1.5).Conclusion: Digital data collection is effective for obtaining clinical data in patients with ankle sprains. Level of Evidence III, Comparative, Prospective, Longitudinal Study in Parallel Groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10726704/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233105e268380\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233105e268380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

收集临床数据是开展任何科学研究的必要步骤。在线数字数据收集可以优化这一步骤：比较骨科患者通过在线和物理数字问卷收集临床数据的响应率和准确性：比较研究，III级证据，对40名踝关节扭伤患者进行评估，应用物理和数字视觉模拟量表、足部功能指数和坎伯兰踝关节不稳定性工具问卷进行为期12周的随访，并收集有关每份问卷收集时间的数据：数字收集组的回复率为 83.3%，物理收集组为 60%（P < 0.05），数字收集组在所有收集时间（3、6 和 12 周）的回复率都更高。对收集时间的分析表明，在研究的所有时间段，物理收集组的变异性更大（2.8 vs 1.5；4.0 vs 2.4；8.6 vs 1.5）：结论：数字数据采集能有效获取踝关节扭伤患者的临床数据。证据等级 III，平行组比较性、前瞻性、纵向研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLINICAL DATA COLLECTION THROUGH ONLINE AND PHYSICAL ELECTRONIC QUESTIONNAIRE IN ORTHOPEDIC PATIENTS.

The collection of clinical data is an essential step for the development of any scientific research. Online digital data collection can optimize this step.

Objective: To compare the response rate and the accuracy of the clinical data collection date through the online and physical digital questionnaire in orthopedic patients.

Methods: Comparative study, level III of evidence, with forty patients who had ankle sprains were evaluated, followed up for a period of 12 weeks with the application of physical and digital Visual Analogue Scale, Foot Function Index and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool questionnaires, and data were collected about the moment of collection of each questionnaire.

Results: We obtained a response rate of 83.3% in the digital collection group and 60% in the physical collection group (p < 0.05), and the response rate in the digital collection group was higher at all times of collection (3, 6 and 12 weeks). Analysis of the time of collection shows greater variability in the larger physical collection group at all times of the study (2.8 vs 1.5; 4.0 vs 2.4; 8.6 vs 1.5).

Conclusion: Digital data collection is effective for obtaining clinical data in patients with ankle sprains. Level of Evidence III, Comparative, Prospective, Longitudinal Study in Parallel Groups.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Orthopedics-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

14.30%

发文量

审稿时长

25 weeks

期刊介绍： A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.