刚果民主共和国输血细菌污染的知识、态度和实践调查。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Blood Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-17 DOI:10.2450/BloodTransfus.586
Anne-Sophie Heroes, Paul Kabamba, Aimée Luyindula, Bernard Bongenya, Pierre Nzazi, Monica Nasali, Cathérine Akele, Marie-Paule Lusinga, John Ekofo, José Coene, Inge Van Cauwenberg, Philippe Vandekerckhove, Octavie Lunguya, Jan Jacobs
{"title":"刚果民主共和国输血细菌污染的知识、态度和实践调查。","authors":"Anne-Sophie Heroes, Paul Kabamba, Aimée Luyindula, Bernard Bongenya, Pierre Nzazi, Monica Nasali, Cathérine Akele, Marie-Paule Lusinga, John Ekofo, José Coene, Inge Van Cauwenberg, Philippe Vandekerckhove, Octavie Lunguya, Jan Jacobs","doi":"10.2450/BloodTransfus.586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We assessed healthcare worker's knowledge-attitude-practice regarding bacterial contamination of blood products in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In three hospitals and the National Blood Transfusion Center (NBTC), two multiple-choice surveys were completed on a tablet computer: one each, for blood bank (31 questions) and for clinical ward staff (20 questions). A score was calculated for 11 overlapping knowledge questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 247 participants (blood bank No.=62, ward No.=185), median (range) knowledge score was 10 (2-19) on a maximum of 20, with blood bank staff (12/20) scoring higher than clinical ward staff (9/20) (p<0.0001). Half (50.2%) of 247 participants recalled previous training in transfusion medicine. Participants had limited understanding of and compliance with NBTC-recommended preventive measures: incorrect assumption that wearing gloves prevents bacterial contamination (83.8%) and that blood banks test donor blood for bacteria (59.9%). Half (50.0%) of blood bank staff did not acknowledge the NBTC-recommended antisepsis procedure, 62.1% did not apply the appropriate number of antisepsis steps, and 32.3% saw no harm in touching the venipuncture site after antisepsis. Presence of bacteria on healthy skin (62.3%) and blood bank fomites (examination gloves: 30.8%, soap: 62.8%) was underestimated. Although 92.4% of clinical ward staff said to easily recognize transfusion reactions, only 15.7% recognized septic reactions and post-transfusion antibiotic treatment practices were not consistent. Challenges reported by blood bank staff and particular for low-resource settings were: frequent power cuts (98.4%), transport of blood products by patient attendants (41.1%), without cooling elements (64.4%), and reuse of finished antiseptic/disinfectant containers (75.4%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The present study points to gaps in knowledge, attitudes, practices along sampling, cold chain and transfusion which can feed customized training and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":49260,"journal":{"name":"Blood Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"213-225"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge, attitude and practice survey of bacterial contamination of blood for transfusion in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Sophie Heroes, Paul Kabamba, Aimée Luyindula, Bernard Bongenya, Pierre Nzazi, Monica Nasali, Cathérine Akele, Marie-Paule Lusinga, John Ekofo, José Coene, Inge Van Cauwenberg, Philippe Vandekerckhove, Octavie Lunguya, Jan Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.2450/BloodTransfus.586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We assessed healthcare worker's knowledge-attitude-practice regarding bacterial contamination of blood products in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In three hospitals and the National Blood Transfusion Center (NBTC), two multiple-choice surveys were completed on a tablet computer: one each, for blood bank (31 questions) and for clinical ward staff (20 questions). A score was calculated for 11 overlapping knowledge questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 247 participants (blood bank No.=62, ward No.=185), median (range) knowledge score was 10 (2-19) on a maximum of 20, with blood bank staff (12/20) scoring higher than clinical ward staff (9/20) (p<0.0001). Half (50.2%) of 247 participants recalled previous training in transfusion medicine. Participants had limited understanding of and compliance with NBTC-recommended preventive measures: incorrect assumption that wearing gloves prevents bacterial contamination (83.8%) and that blood banks test donor blood for bacteria (59.9%). Half (50.0%) of blood bank staff did not acknowledge the NBTC-recommended antisepsis procedure, 62.1% did not apply the appropriate number of antisepsis steps, and 32.3% saw no harm in touching the venipuncture site after antisepsis. Presence of bacteria on healthy skin (62.3%) and blood bank fomites (examination gloves: 30.8%, soap: 62.8%) was underestimated. Although 92.4% of clinical ward staff said to easily recognize transfusion reactions, only 15.7% recognized septic reactions and post-transfusion antibiotic treatment practices were not consistent. Challenges reported by blood bank staff and particular for low-resource settings were: frequent power cuts (98.4%), transport of blood products by patient attendants (41.1%), without cooling elements (64.4%), and reuse of finished antiseptic/disinfectant containers (75.4%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The present study points to gaps in knowledge, attitudes, practices along sampling, cold chain and transfusion which can feed customized training and monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Transfusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"213-225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073624/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2450/BloodTransfus.586\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2450/BloodTransfus.586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们对刚果民主共和国医护人员在血液制品细菌污染方面的知识-态度-实践进行了评估:在三家医院和国家输血中心(NBTC),通过平板电脑完成了两项选择题调查:血库(31 道题)和临床病房工作人员(20 道题)。对 11 个重叠的知识问题进行了评分:在 247 名参与者(血库人数=62,病房人数=185)中,知识得分的中位数(范围)为 10(2-19)分,最高分为 20 分,血库工作人员(12/20)的得分高于临床病房工作人员(9/20)(讨论:本研究指出了在采样、冷链和输血的知识、态度和实践方面存在的差距,可为定制培训和监测提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge, attitude and practice survey of bacterial contamination of blood for transfusion in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Background: We assessed healthcare worker's knowledge-attitude-practice regarding bacterial contamination of blood products in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Materials and methods: In three hospitals and the National Blood Transfusion Center (NBTC), two multiple-choice surveys were completed on a tablet computer: one each, for blood bank (31 questions) and for clinical ward staff (20 questions). A score was calculated for 11 overlapping knowledge questions.

Results: Among 247 participants (blood bank No.=62, ward No.=185), median (range) knowledge score was 10 (2-19) on a maximum of 20, with blood bank staff (12/20) scoring higher than clinical ward staff (9/20) (p<0.0001). Half (50.2%) of 247 participants recalled previous training in transfusion medicine. Participants had limited understanding of and compliance with NBTC-recommended preventive measures: incorrect assumption that wearing gloves prevents bacterial contamination (83.8%) and that blood banks test donor blood for bacteria (59.9%). Half (50.0%) of blood bank staff did not acknowledge the NBTC-recommended antisepsis procedure, 62.1% did not apply the appropriate number of antisepsis steps, and 32.3% saw no harm in touching the venipuncture site after antisepsis. Presence of bacteria on healthy skin (62.3%) and blood bank fomites (examination gloves: 30.8%, soap: 62.8%) was underestimated. Although 92.4% of clinical ward staff said to easily recognize transfusion reactions, only 15.7% recognized septic reactions and post-transfusion antibiotic treatment practices were not consistent. Challenges reported by blood bank staff and particular for low-resource settings were: frequent power cuts (98.4%), transport of blood products by patient attendants (41.1%), without cooling elements (64.4%), and reuse of finished antiseptic/disinfectant containers (75.4%).

Discussion: The present study points to gaps in knowledge, attitudes, practices along sampling, cold chain and transfusion which can feed customized training and monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Transfusion
Blood Transfusion HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Blood Transfusion welcomes international submissions of Original Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports and Letters on all the fields related to Transfusion Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信