{"title":"病态肥胖患者喉镜检查和/或插管困难的预测:上唇咬合试验与改良的马兰帕蒂分类法对比。","authors":"Freda Richa, Christine El-Hage, Viviane Chalhoub, Patricia Yazbeck","doi":"10.1177/17504589231206903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aim to compare the upper lip bite test with the modified Mallampati test as predictors of difficult laryngoscopy and/or difficult intubation among morbidly obese patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 500 morbidly obese patients (body mass index > 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) undergoing general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation are included in this prospective single-blinded observational clinical study. The preoperative airway assessment is obtained by the modified Mallampati test and upper lip bite test. The difficulty of laryngoscopy is assessed by an experienced anaesthetist in patients adequately anaesthetised and fully relaxed. The view is classified according to Cormack and Lehane's classification. Modified Mallampati test III or IV and upper lip bite test III are considered positive tests. Difficult laryngoscopy is defined as Cormack and Lehane's classification III and IV, whereas difficult endotracheal intubation is defined as an intubation difficulty scale ⩾ 5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidences of Cormack and Lehane's classification III and IV and intubation difficulty scale ⩾ 5 are 9.4% and 11.8% respectively. The specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy are higher with the upper lip bite test. The combination of the upper lip bite test and the modified Mallampati test improved these measures. The likelihood ratio + was significantly higher for the upper lip bite test (6.35 and 9.47) than for the modified Mallampati test (3.21 and 3.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The upper lip bite test is a test with high sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and accuracy making it a favourable test for identifying easy and difficult intubations and laryngoscopies in morbidly obese patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy and/or intubation among morbidly obese patients: Upper lip bite test versus modified Mallampati classification.\",\"authors\":\"Freda Richa, Christine El-Hage, Viviane Chalhoub, Patricia Yazbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17504589231206903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aim to compare the upper lip bite test with the modified Mallampati test as predictors of difficult laryngoscopy and/or difficult intubation among morbidly obese patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 500 morbidly obese patients (body mass index > 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) undergoing general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation are included in this prospective single-blinded observational clinical study. The preoperative airway assessment is obtained by the modified Mallampati test and upper lip bite test. The difficulty of laryngoscopy is assessed by an experienced anaesthetist in patients adequately anaesthetised and fully relaxed. The view is classified according to Cormack and Lehane's classification. Modified Mallampati test III or IV and upper lip bite test III are considered positive tests. Difficult laryngoscopy is defined as Cormack and Lehane's classification III and IV, whereas difficult endotracheal intubation is defined as an intubation difficulty scale ⩾ 5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidences of Cormack and Lehane's classification III and IV and intubation difficulty scale ⩾ 5 are 9.4% and 11.8% respectively. The specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy are higher with the upper lip bite test. The combination of the upper lip bite test and the modified Mallampati test improved these measures. The likelihood ratio + was significantly higher for the upper lip bite test (6.35 and 9.47) than for the modified Mallampati test (3.21 and 3.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The upper lip bite test is a test with high sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and accuracy making it a favourable test for identifying easy and difficult intubations and laryngoscopies in morbidly obese patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589231206903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589231206903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言我们的目的是比较上唇咬合试验和改良马兰帕蒂试验对病态肥胖患者喉镜检查困难和/或插管困难的预测作用:这项前瞻性单盲观察临床研究共纳入了 500 名接受气管插管全身麻醉的病态肥胖患者(体重指数大于 40 kg/m2)。术前气道评估采用改良马兰帕蒂试验和上唇咬合试验。由经验丰富的麻醉师对充分麻醉和完全放松的患者进行喉镜检查难度评估。视图根据 Cormack 和 Lehane 的分类进行分类。改良马兰帕蒂测试 III 或 IV 和上唇咬合测试 III 被视为阳性测试。喉镜检查困难的定义是 Cormack 和 Lehane 分级 III 和 IV 级,而气管插管困难的定义是插管困难度 ⩾ 5:Cormack 和 Lehane 分级 III 和 IV 以及插管难度分级 ⩾ 5 的发生率分别为 9.4% 和 11.8%。上唇咬合试验的特异性、阳性预测值和准确性更高。将上唇咬合试验和改良的马兰帕蒂试验结合使用可提高这些指标。上唇咬合试验的似然比+(6.35 和 9.47)明显高于改良的马兰帕蒂试验(3.21 和 3.16):上唇咬合试验具有较高的灵敏度、特异性、阴性预测值和准确性,是鉴别病态肥胖患者插管和喉镜检查难易程度的理想试验。
Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy and/or intubation among morbidly obese patients: Upper lip bite test versus modified Mallampati classification.
Introduction: We aim to compare the upper lip bite test with the modified Mallampati test as predictors of difficult laryngoscopy and/or difficult intubation among morbidly obese patients.
Methods: A total of 500 morbidly obese patients (body mass index > 40 kg/m2) undergoing general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation are included in this prospective single-blinded observational clinical study. The preoperative airway assessment is obtained by the modified Mallampati test and upper lip bite test. The difficulty of laryngoscopy is assessed by an experienced anaesthetist in patients adequately anaesthetised and fully relaxed. The view is classified according to Cormack and Lehane's classification. Modified Mallampati test III or IV and upper lip bite test III are considered positive tests. Difficult laryngoscopy is defined as Cormack and Lehane's classification III and IV, whereas difficult endotracheal intubation is defined as an intubation difficulty scale ⩾ 5.
Results: The incidences of Cormack and Lehane's classification III and IV and intubation difficulty scale ⩾ 5 are 9.4% and 11.8% respectively. The specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy are higher with the upper lip bite test. The combination of the upper lip bite test and the modified Mallampati test improved these measures. The likelihood ratio + was significantly higher for the upper lip bite test (6.35 and 9.47) than for the modified Mallampati test (3.21 and 3.16).
Conclusion: The upper lip bite test is a test with high sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and accuracy making it a favourable test for identifying easy and difficult intubations and laryngoscopies in morbidly obese patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.