Donald Iain MacDonald, Monessha Jayabalan, Jonathan Seaman, Rakshita Balaji, Alec Nickolls, Alexander Chesler
{"title":"缺乏 P 物质和 CGRPα 信号传导的小鼠会持续感到疼痛。","authors":"Donald Iain MacDonald, Monessha Jayabalan, Jonathan Seaman, Rakshita Balaji, Alec Nickolls, Alexander Chesler","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.15.567208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The neuropeptides Substance P and CGRPα have long been thought important for pain sensation. Both peptides and their receptors are expressed at high levels in pain-responsive neurons from the periphery to the brain making them attractive therapeutic targets. However, drugs targeting these pathways individually did not relieve pain in clinical trials. Since Substance P and CGRPα are extensively co-expressed we hypothesized that their simultaneous inhibition would be required for effective analgesia. We therefore generated <i>Tac1</i> and <i>Calca</i> double knockout (DKO) mice and assessed their behavior using a wide range of pain-relevant assays. As expected, Substance P and CGRPα peptides were undetectable throughout the nervous system of DKO mice. To our surprise, these animals displayed largely intact responses to mechanical, thermal, chemical, and visceral pain stimuli, as well as itch. Moreover, chronic inflammatory pain and neurogenic inflammation were unaffected by loss of the two peptides. Finally, neuropathic pain evoked by nerve injury or chemotherapy treatment was also preserved in peptide-deficient mice. Thus, our results demonstrate that even in combination, Substance P and CGRPα are not required for the transmission of acute and chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":72407,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10705526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain persists in mice lacking both Substance P and CGRPα signaling.\",\"authors\":\"Donald Iain MacDonald, Monessha Jayabalan, Jonathan Seaman, Rakshita Balaji, Alec Nickolls, Alexander Chesler\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2023.11.15.567208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The neuropeptides Substance P and CGRPα have long been thought important for pain sensation. Both peptides and their receptors are expressed at high levels in pain-responsive neurons from the periphery to the brain making them attractive therapeutic targets. However, drugs targeting these pathways individually did not relieve pain in clinical trials. Since Substance P and CGRPα are extensively co-expressed we hypothesized that their simultaneous inhibition would be required for effective analgesia. We therefore generated <i>Tac1</i> and <i>Calca</i> double knockout (DKO) mice and assessed their behavior using a wide range of pain-relevant assays. As expected, Substance P and CGRPα peptides were undetectable throughout the nervous system of DKO mice. To our surprise, these animals displayed largely intact responses to mechanical, thermal, chemical, and visceral pain stimuli, as well as itch. Moreover, chronic inflammatory pain and neurogenic inflammation were unaffected by loss of the two peptides. Finally, neuropathic pain evoked by nerve injury or chemotherapy treatment was also preserved in peptide-deficient mice. Thus, our results demonstrate that even in combination, Substance P and CGRPα are not required for the transmission of acute and chronic pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10705526/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.567208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.567208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
长期以来,人们一直认为神经肽 Substance P 和 CGRPα 对痛觉非常重要。这两种肽及其受体在从外周到大脑的疼痛反应神经元中都有高水平表达,因此成为极具吸引力的治疗靶点。然而,在临床试验中,单独针对这些通路的药物并不能缓解疼痛。由于物质 P 和 CGRPα 广泛共表达,我们假设需要同时抑制它们才能有效镇痛。因此,我们产生了 Tac1 和 Calca 双基因敲除(DKO)小鼠,并使用多种疼痛相关实验对它们的行为进行了评估。不出所料,DKO 小鼠的整个神经系统都检测不到 P 物质和 CGRPα 肽。令我们惊讶的是,这些动物对机械、热、化学和内脏疼痛刺激以及瘙痒的反应基本完好无损。此外,慢性炎症性疼痛和神经源性炎症不受这两种肽缺失的影响。最后,神经损伤或化疗诱发的神经性疼痛在肽缺陷小鼠体内也得到了保留。因此,我们的研究结果表明,即使将物质 P 和 CGRPα 结合在一起,也不是传递急性和慢性疼痛所必需的。
Pain persists in mice lacking both Substance P and CGRPα signaling.
The neuropeptides Substance P and CGRPα have long been thought important for pain sensation. Both peptides and their receptors are expressed at high levels in pain-responsive neurons from the periphery to the brain making them attractive therapeutic targets. However, drugs targeting these pathways individually did not relieve pain in clinical trials. Since Substance P and CGRPα are extensively co-expressed we hypothesized that their simultaneous inhibition would be required for effective analgesia. We therefore generated Tac1 and Calca double knockout (DKO) mice and assessed their behavior using a wide range of pain-relevant assays. As expected, Substance P and CGRPα peptides were undetectable throughout the nervous system of DKO mice. To our surprise, these animals displayed largely intact responses to mechanical, thermal, chemical, and visceral pain stimuli, as well as itch. Moreover, chronic inflammatory pain and neurogenic inflammation were unaffected by loss of the two peptides. Finally, neuropathic pain evoked by nerve injury or chemotherapy treatment was also preserved in peptide-deficient mice. Thus, our results demonstrate that even in combination, Substance P and CGRPα are not required for the transmission of acute and chronic pain.