护理点检测(POCT)的障碍、促进因素、益处和弊端:苏格兰全科医生非工作时间(GPOOH)服务调查。

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-07-29 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0094
Sarah Ee Mills, Sm Babar Akbar, Virginia Hernandez-Santiago
{"title":"护理点检测(POCT)的障碍、促进因素、益处和弊端:苏格兰全科医生非工作时间(GPOOH)服务调查。","authors":"Sarah Ee Mills, Sm Babar Akbar, Virginia Hernandez-Santiago","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The general practice out-of-hours (GPOOH) service is under pressure to treat more patients in less time, while reducing referrals and minimising diagnostic errors. Point-of-care (POC) testing involves rapid clinical tests that can be used to generate results during the consultation, and has the potential to facilitate managing these competing demands safely.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe current availability of POC tests in GPOOH in Scotland, and identify barriers, enablers, benefits, and drawbacks to its use.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Cross-sectional mixed-methods study, which surveyed opinions of clinicians working in the GPOOH service in NHS Scotland.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An electronic questionnaire was developed, designed, piloted, and distributed to clinicians, which had closed questions and areas for free text.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 142 responses were received. Urine dipstick testing (99.2%), pregnancy tests (98.5%), oxygen saturation (97.7%), and blood glucose testing (93.9%), were the only POC tests commonly available in GPOOH in NHS Scotland. There was strongest support for the provision of POC tests, particularly C-reactive protein (CRP; 79.4%), strep A (76.0%), and D-dimer (75.2%). Responders felt that POC tests would improve confidence (92.3%) and safety (89.8%) surrounding clinical decision making, improve patient satisfaction (80.6%), and reduce hospital and secondary care referrals (77.5%). Barriers to POC test use were availability of the test kits and machines (94.5%), training requirements on how to use the machine (71.1%) and interpret results (56.3%), and time to do the test (62.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few POC tests are in regular use in GPOOH in Scotland. GPOOH clinicians are supportive of using POC testing. They identified a number of benefits to its use, with very few drawbacks. Increased provision of POC testing in GPOOH in NHS Scotland should be considered urgently.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers, enablers, benefits, and drawbacks to point-of-care testing: a survey of the general practice out-of-hours service in Scotland.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Ee Mills, Sm Babar Akbar, Virginia Hernandez-Santiago\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The general practice out-of-hours (GPOOH) service is under pressure to treat more patients in less time, while reducing referrals and minimising diagnostic errors. Point-of-care (POC) testing involves rapid clinical tests that can be used to generate results during the consultation, and has the potential to facilitate managing these competing demands safely.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe current availability of POC tests in GPOOH in Scotland, and identify barriers, enablers, benefits, and drawbacks to its use.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Cross-sectional mixed-methods study, which surveyed opinions of clinicians working in the GPOOH service in NHS Scotland.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An electronic questionnaire was developed, designed, piloted, and distributed to clinicians, which had closed questions and areas for free text.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 142 responses were received. Urine dipstick testing (99.2%), pregnancy tests (98.5%), oxygen saturation (97.7%), and blood glucose testing (93.9%), were the only POC tests commonly available in GPOOH in NHS Scotland. There was strongest support for the provision of POC tests, particularly C-reactive protein (CRP; 79.4%), strep A (76.0%), and D-dimer (75.2%). Responders felt that POC tests would improve confidence (92.3%) and safety (89.8%) surrounding clinical decision making, improve patient satisfaction (80.6%), and reduce hospital and secondary care referrals (77.5%). Barriers to POC test use were availability of the test kits and machines (94.5%), training requirements on how to use the machine (71.1%) and interpret results (56.3%), and time to do the test (62.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few POC tests are in regular use in GPOOH in Scotland. GPOOH clinicians are supportive of using POC testing. They identified a number of benefits to its use, with very few drawbacks. Increased provision of POC testing in GPOOH in NHS Scotland should be considered urgently.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300988/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全科医生非工作时间服务(GPOOH)面临着在更短时间内治疗更多病人的压力,同时还要减少转诊和诊断错误。护理点测试(POCT)是一种快速临床测试,可在问诊过程中得出结果,并有可能促进安全地管理这些相互竞争的需求。目的:描述苏格兰 GPOOH 目前的 POCT 可用性,并确定其使用的障碍、促进因素、好处和缺点:设计与环境:开发电子问卷,进行试点设计,并分发给苏格兰国家医疗服务体系中 GPOOH 的临床医生:方法:横断面混合方法研究,采用封闭式问题和自由文本:结果:共收到 142 份回复。在苏格兰国家医疗服务体系的 GPOOH 中,尿液浸量计测试(99.2%)、妊娠测试(98.5%)、血氧饱和度(97.7%)和血糖测试(93.9%)是唯一可提供的常见测试。受访者最支持提供 POCT,尤其是 CRP(79.4%)、A 型链球菌(76.0%)和 D-二聚体(75.2%)。受访者认为 POCT 可增强临床决策的信心(92.3%)和安全性(89.8%),提高患者满意度(80.6%),减少医院和二级医疗机构的转诊(77.5%)。使用 POCT 的障碍是检测试剂盒和机器的供应(94.5%)、如何使用机器(71.1%)和解释结果(56.3%)的培训要求以及进行检测的时间(62.0%):结论:在苏格兰的全科医生组织(GPOOH)中,定期使用 POCT 的医院很少。GPOOH的临床医生支持使用POCT。他们认为使用 POCT 有很多好处,缺点很少。应立即考虑在苏格兰国家医疗服务体系的 GPOOH 中增加 POCT 的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers, enablers, benefits, and drawbacks to point-of-care testing: a survey of the general practice out-of-hours service in Scotland.

Background: The general practice out-of-hours (GPOOH) service is under pressure to treat more patients in less time, while reducing referrals and minimising diagnostic errors. Point-of-care (POC) testing involves rapid clinical tests that can be used to generate results during the consultation, and has the potential to facilitate managing these competing demands safely.

Aim: To describe current availability of POC tests in GPOOH in Scotland, and identify barriers, enablers, benefits, and drawbacks to its use.

Design & setting: Cross-sectional mixed-methods study, which surveyed opinions of clinicians working in the GPOOH service in NHS Scotland.

Method: An electronic questionnaire was developed, designed, piloted, and distributed to clinicians, which had closed questions and areas for free text.

Results: In total, 142 responses were received. Urine dipstick testing (99.2%), pregnancy tests (98.5%), oxygen saturation (97.7%), and blood glucose testing (93.9%), were the only POC tests commonly available in GPOOH in NHS Scotland. There was strongest support for the provision of POC tests, particularly C-reactive protein (CRP; 79.4%), strep A (76.0%), and D-dimer (75.2%). Responders felt that POC tests would improve confidence (92.3%) and safety (89.8%) surrounding clinical decision making, improve patient satisfaction (80.6%), and reduce hospital and secondary care referrals (77.5%). Barriers to POC test use were availability of the test kits and machines (94.5%), training requirements on how to use the machine (71.1%) and interpret results (56.3%), and time to do the test (62.0%).

Conclusion: Few POC tests are in regular use in GPOOH in Scotland. GPOOH clinicians are supportive of using POC testing. They identified a number of benefits to its use, with very few drawbacks. Increased provision of POC testing in GPOOH in NHS Scotland should be considered urgently.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信