改进状态转换模型中总生存期和无进展生存期的估算。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Peter C Wigfield, Bart Heeg, Mario Ouwens
{"title":"改进状态转换模型中总生存期和无进展生存期的估算。","authors":"Peter C Wigfield, Bart Heeg, Mario Ouwens","doi":"10.57264/cer-2023-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance (Technical Support Document 19) highlights a key challenge of state transition models (STMs) being their difficulty in achieving a satisfactory fit to the observed within-trial endpoints. Fitting poorly to data over the trial period can then have implications for long-term extrapolations. A novel estimation approach is defined in which the predicted overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) extrapolations from an STM are optimized to provide closer estimates of the within-trial endpoints. <b>Materials & methods:</b> An STM was fitted to the SQUIRE trial data in non-small-cell lung cancer (obtained from Project Data Sphere). Two methods were used: a standard approach whereby the maximum likelihood was utilized for the individual transitions and the best-fitting parametric model selected based on AIC/BIC, and a novel approach in which parameters were optimized by minimizing the area between the STM-predicted OS and PFS curves and the corresponding OS and PFS Kaplan-Meier curves. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess uncertainty. <b>Results:</b> The novel approach resulted in closer estimations to the OS and PFS Kaplan-Meier for all combinations of parametric distributions analyzed compared with the standard approach. Though the uncertainty associated with the novel approach was slightly larger, it provided better estimates to the restricted mean survival time in 10 of the 12 parametric distributions analyzed. <b>Conclusion:</b> A novel approach is defined which provides an alternative STM estimation method enabling improved fits to modeled endpoints, which can easily be extended to more complex model structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e230031"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10842287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved estimation of overall survival and progression-free survival for state transition modeling.\",\"authors\":\"Peter C Wigfield, Bart Heeg, Mario Ouwens\",\"doi\":\"10.57264/cer-2023-0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance (Technical Support Document 19) highlights a key challenge of state transition models (STMs) being their difficulty in achieving a satisfactory fit to the observed within-trial endpoints. Fitting poorly to data over the trial period can then have implications for long-term extrapolations. A novel estimation approach is defined in which the predicted overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) extrapolations from an STM are optimized to provide closer estimates of the within-trial endpoints. <b>Materials & methods:</b> An STM was fitted to the SQUIRE trial data in non-small-cell lung cancer (obtained from Project Data Sphere). Two methods were used: a standard approach whereby the maximum likelihood was utilized for the individual transitions and the best-fitting parametric model selected based on AIC/BIC, and a novel approach in which parameters were optimized by minimizing the area between the STM-predicted OS and PFS curves and the corresponding OS and PFS Kaplan-Meier curves. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess uncertainty. <b>Results:</b> The novel approach resulted in closer estimations to the OS and PFS Kaplan-Meier for all combinations of parametric distributions analyzed compared with the standard approach. Though the uncertainty associated with the novel approach was slightly larger, it provided better estimates to the restricted mean survival time in 10 of the 12 parametric distributions analyzed. <b>Conclusion:</b> A novel approach is defined which provides an alternative STM estimation method enabling improved fits to modeled endpoints, which can easily be extended to more complex model structures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comparative effectiveness research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e230031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10842287/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comparative effectiveness research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2023-0031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2023-0031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:国家健康与护理卓越研究所指南(第 19 号技术支持文件)强调了状态转换模型(STMs)的一个主要挑战,即很难与试验内观察到的终点达到令人满意的拟合。如果与试验期间的数据拟合不理想,就会对长期外推产生影响。本文定义了一种新的估算方法,通过优化状态转换模型预测的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)外推值,提供更接近试验内终点的估算值。材料与方法:将 STM 拟合到非小细胞肺癌 SQUIRE 试验数据中(数据来自 Project Data Sphere)。使用了两种方法:一种是标准方法,即利用最大似然法进行单个转换,并根据 AIC/BIC 选择最拟合的参数模型;另一种是新方法,即通过最小化 STM 预测的 OS 和 PFS 曲线与相应的 OS 和 PFS Kaplan-Meier 曲线之间的面积来优化参数。进行了敏感性分析以评估不确定性。结果:与标准方法相比,在分析的所有参数分布组合中,新方法都能得出更接近于 OS 和 PFS Kaplan-Meier 的估计值。虽然新方法的不确定性稍大,但在分析的 12 个参数分布中,有 10 个参数分布的限制性平均生存时间的估算结果更好。结论定义了一种新方法,它提供了一种替代的 STM 估算方法,可改善模型终点的拟合,并可轻松扩展到更复杂的模型结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved estimation of overall survival and progression-free survival for state transition modeling.

Aim: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance (Technical Support Document 19) highlights a key challenge of state transition models (STMs) being their difficulty in achieving a satisfactory fit to the observed within-trial endpoints. Fitting poorly to data over the trial period can then have implications for long-term extrapolations. A novel estimation approach is defined in which the predicted overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) extrapolations from an STM are optimized to provide closer estimates of the within-trial endpoints. Materials & methods: An STM was fitted to the SQUIRE trial data in non-small-cell lung cancer (obtained from Project Data Sphere). Two methods were used: a standard approach whereby the maximum likelihood was utilized for the individual transitions and the best-fitting parametric model selected based on AIC/BIC, and a novel approach in which parameters were optimized by minimizing the area between the STM-predicted OS and PFS curves and the corresponding OS and PFS Kaplan-Meier curves. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess uncertainty. Results: The novel approach resulted in closer estimations to the OS and PFS Kaplan-Meier for all combinations of parametric distributions analyzed compared with the standard approach. Though the uncertainty associated with the novel approach was slightly larger, it provided better estimates to the restricted mean survival time in 10 of the 12 parametric distributions analyzed. Conclusion: A novel approach is defined which provides an alternative STM estimation method enabling improved fits to modeled endpoints, which can easily be extended to more complex model structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of comparative effectiveness research
Journal of comparative effectiveness research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies. Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信