髌股内侧韧带重建术后支撑

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Knee Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1055/a-2232-4856
Andrew L Schaver, Meaghan A Tranovich, Olivia C O'Reilly, Matthew J Bollier, Kyle R Duchman, Brian R Wolf, Robert W Westermann
{"title":"髌股内侧韧带重建术后支撑","authors":"Andrew L Schaver, Meaghan A Tranovich, Olivia C O'Reilly, Matthew J Bollier, Kyle R Duchman, Brian R Wolf, Robert W Westermann","doi":"10.1055/a-2232-4856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is unclear if bracing is necessary after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) for recurrent patellar instability. We hypothesize that patients who did not use a brace will have similar outcomes to those who were braced postoperatively. A retrospective review of patients who underwent isolated MPFLr from January 2015 to September 2020 at a single institution was performed. Those with less than 6 weeks of follow-up were excluded. The braced group was provided a hinged-knee brace postoperatively until the return of quadriceps function, which was determined by the treating physical therapist (brace, \"B\"; no brace, \"NB\"). Time to straight leg raise (SLR) without lag, recurrent instability, and total re-operations were determined. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to evaluate outcomes (statistical significance, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Overall, 229 isolated MPFLr were included (B: 165 knees, 146 patients; NB: 64 knees, 58 patients). Baseline demographics were similar (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). Median time to SLR without lag was shorter in the NB group (41 days [interquartile range [IQR]: 20-47] vs. 44 days [IQR: 35.5-88.3], <i>p</i> = 0.01), while return to sport times were equivalent (B: 155 days [IQR: 127.3-193.8] vs. NB: 145 days [IQR: 124-162], <i>p</i> = 0.31). Recurrent instability rates were not significantly different (B: 12 knees [7.27%] vs. NB: 1 knee [1.56%], <i>p</i> = 0.09), but the re-operation rate was higher in the brace group (20 knees [12.1%] vs. 0 [0%], <i>p</i> = 0.001). Regression analysis identified brace use (odds ratio [OR]: 19.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-269.40, <i>p</i> = 0.026) and female patients (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.01-7.34, <i>p</i> = 0.049) to be associated with needing reoperation. Recurrent instability rates and return to sport times were similar between patients who did or did not use a hinged knee brace after isolated MPFLr. Re-operation rates were higher in the braced group. Retrospective Comparative Study, Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"631-637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Bracing after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew L Schaver, Meaghan A Tranovich, Olivia C O'Reilly, Matthew J Bollier, Kyle R Duchman, Brian R Wolf, Robert W Westermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2232-4856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is unclear if bracing is necessary after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) for recurrent patellar instability. We hypothesize that patients who did not use a brace will have similar outcomes to those who were braced postoperatively. A retrospective review of patients who underwent isolated MPFLr from January 2015 to September 2020 at a single institution was performed. Those with less than 6 weeks of follow-up were excluded. The braced group was provided a hinged-knee brace postoperatively until the return of quadriceps function, which was determined by the treating physical therapist (brace, \\\"B\\\"; no brace, \\\"NB\\\"). Time to straight leg raise (SLR) without lag, recurrent instability, and total re-operations were determined. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to evaluate outcomes (statistical significance, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Overall, 229 isolated MPFLr were included (B: 165 knees, 146 patients; NB: 64 knees, 58 patients). Baseline demographics were similar (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). Median time to SLR without lag was shorter in the NB group (41 days [interquartile range [IQR]: 20-47] vs. 44 days [IQR: 35.5-88.3], <i>p</i> = 0.01), while return to sport times were equivalent (B: 155 days [IQR: 127.3-193.8] vs. NB: 145 days [IQR: 124-162], <i>p</i> = 0.31). Recurrent instability rates were not significantly different (B: 12 knees [7.27%] vs. NB: 1 knee [1.56%], <i>p</i> = 0.09), but the re-operation rate was higher in the brace group (20 knees [12.1%] vs. 0 [0%], <i>p</i> = 0.001). Regression analysis identified brace use (odds ratio [OR]: 19.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-269.40, <i>p</i> = 0.026) and female patients (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.01-7.34, <i>p</i> = 0.049) to be associated with needing reoperation. Recurrent instability rates and return to sport times were similar between patients who did or did not use a hinged knee brace after isolated MPFLr. Re-operation rates were higher in the braced group. Retrospective Comparative Study, Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"631-637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2232-4856\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2232-4856","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

髌骨股骨内侧韧带重建术后支撑术 Abstract Introduction:目前尚不清楚孤立的髌股内侧韧带重建术(MPFLr)治疗复发性髌骨不稳是否需要支撑。我们假设,未使用支撑架的患者与术后使用支撑架的患者结果相似:我们对 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 9 月期间在一家机构接受孤立 MPFLr 的患者进行了回顾性研究。随访不足 6 周的患者被排除在外。支撑组术后使用铰链式膝关节支撑,直至股四头肌功能恢复,恢复情况由主治理疗师决定(支撑,"B";无支撑,"NB")。对直腿抬高无滞后时间、复发不稳定性和再次手术总数进行了测定。采用单变量分析和逻辑回归对结果进行评估(统计显著性,P结果:共纳入 229 例孤立 MPFLr(B:165 膝,146 例患者;NB:64 膝,58 例患者)。基线人口统计学特征相似(均 p>0.05)。NB组无滞后直腿抬高的中位时间较短(41天 [IQR,20-47] vs. 44天 [IQR,35.5-88.3],p=0.01),而恢复运动时间相当(B组155天 [IQR,127.3-193.8] vs. NB组145天 [IQR,124-162],p=0.31)。复发性不稳定性发生率无明显差异(B组12个膝关节[7.27%] vs NB组1个膝关节[1.56%],P=0.09),但支架组的再手术率更高(B组20个膝关节[12.1%] vs NB组0个膝关节[0%],P=0.001)。回归分析发现,使用支具(OR 19.63,95%CI 1.43-269.40,p=0.026)和女性患者(OR 2.79,95%CI 1.01-7.34,p=0.049)与需要再次手术有关:结论:孤立性MPFLr术后使用或不使用膝关节铰链支具的患者复发不稳定率和恢复运动时间相似。研究设计:研究设计:回顾性比较研究,III级 关键术语:髌骨不稳、MPFL 重建、支撑、康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative Bracing after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

It is unclear if bracing is necessary after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) for recurrent patellar instability. We hypothesize that patients who did not use a brace will have similar outcomes to those who were braced postoperatively. A retrospective review of patients who underwent isolated MPFLr from January 2015 to September 2020 at a single institution was performed. Those with less than 6 weeks of follow-up were excluded. The braced group was provided a hinged-knee brace postoperatively until the return of quadriceps function, which was determined by the treating physical therapist (brace, "B"; no brace, "NB"). Time to straight leg raise (SLR) without lag, recurrent instability, and total re-operations were determined. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to evaluate outcomes (statistical significance, p < 0.05). Overall, 229 isolated MPFLr were included (B: 165 knees, 146 patients; NB: 64 knees, 58 patients). Baseline demographics were similar (all p > 0.05). Median time to SLR without lag was shorter in the NB group (41 days [interquartile range [IQR]: 20-47] vs. 44 days [IQR: 35.5-88.3], p = 0.01), while return to sport times were equivalent (B: 155 days [IQR: 127.3-193.8] vs. NB: 145 days [IQR: 124-162], p = 0.31). Recurrent instability rates were not significantly different (B: 12 knees [7.27%] vs. NB: 1 knee [1.56%], p = 0.09), but the re-operation rate was higher in the brace group (20 knees [12.1%] vs. 0 [0%], p = 0.001). Regression analysis identified brace use (odds ratio [OR]: 19.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-269.40, p = 0.026) and female patients (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.01-7.34, p = 0.049) to be associated with needing reoperation. Recurrent instability rates and return to sport times were similar between patients who did or did not use a hinged knee brace after isolated MPFLr. Re-operation rates were higher in the braced group. Retrospective Comparative Study, Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信