预约产前检查的孕妇与未预约产前检查的孕妇的死亡率。

Annals of Saudi medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-07 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2023.357
Abdulrahim Rouzi, Nora Sahly, Abdullah Mohammed Kafy, Rana A Alamoudi, Renad Mazen Abualsaud, Wejdan A Alsheri, Wasayf M Almehmadi, Shahad T Khayyat, Razan M Altumaihi
{"title":"预约产前检查的孕妇与未预约产前检查的孕妇的死亡率。","authors":"Abdulrahim Rouzi, Nora Sahly, Abdullah Mohammed Kafy, Rana A Alamoudi, Renad Mazen Abualsaud, Wejdan A Alsheri, Wasayf M Almehmadi, Shahad T Khayyat, Razan M Altumaihi","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2023.357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perinatal fetal mortality and maternal mortality remains relatively high in Saudi Arabia. Antenatal care aims to improve outcomes; however, evidence to demonstrate its impact on outcomes in Saudi Arabia is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Investigate whether booking status for antenatal care impacted outcomes for pregnant women and identify outcomes that predicted booking status.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All Saudi women admitted to the labor or delivery units between January 2011 and December 2019 were included. Outcomes were compared between booked and unbooked women, and logistic regression was used to identify outcomes that predicted booking status, adjusted for age.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Booked/unbooked status and perinatal mortality of Saudi women.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>10 781 women; 9546 (88.5%) booked, (11.1%) 1192 unbooked.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unbooked mothers had higher incidences of meconium-stained liquor (<i>P</i>=.040), ruptured uterus (<i>P</i>=.017), and blood loss >1000 mL during cesarean deliveries (<i>P</i>=.003), but a lower episiotomy rate (<i>P</i><.001). Perinatal fetal mortality and maternal mortality were equivalent between the two groups. Episiotomy, higher birth weight, higher mother age, perinatal death, delivery mode, onset of labor, and use of analgesics were all independent predictors of the mother being booked when adjusted for all outcomes and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rate of perinatal and maternal mortality in this cohort was relatively low and equivalent between booked and un-booked mothers, contrary to our expectations. More analysis of the socioeconomic data may explain this striking result.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective chart-review with incomplete data retrieval that affected the completeness of data retrieved. The results of the multivariate analysis cannot be used to infer causality because the study is observational.</p>","PeriodicalId":93875,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi medicine","volume":"43 6","pages":"357-363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11182430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mortality outcomes between pregnant women booked for antenatal care and unbooked pregnant women.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulrahim Rouzi, Nora Sahly, Abdullah Mohammed Kafy, Rana A Alamoudi, Renad Mazen Abualsaud, Wejdan A Alsheri, Wasayf M Almehmadi, Shahad T Khayyat, Razan M Altumaihi\",\"doi\":\"10.5144/0256-4947.2023.357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perinatal fetal mortality and maternal mortality remains relatively high in Saudi Arabia. Antenatal care aims to improve outcomes; however, evidence to demonstrate its impact on outcomes in Saudi Arabia is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Investigate whether booking status for antenatal care impacted outcomes for pregnant women and identify outcomes that predicted booking status.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All Saudi women admitted to the labor or delivery units between January 2011 and December 2019 were included. Outcomes were compared between booked and unbooked women, and logistic regression was used to identify outcomes that predicted booking status, adjusted for age.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Booked/unbooked status and perinatal mortality of Saudi women.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>10 781 women; 9546 (88.5%) booked, (11.1%) 1192 unbooked.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unbooked mothers had higher incidences of meconium-stained liquor (<i>P</i>=.040), ruptured uterus (<i>P</i>=.017), and blood loss >1000 mL during cesarean deliveries (<i>P</i>=.003), but a lower episiotomy rate (<i>P</i><.001). Perinatal fetal mortality and maternal mortality were equivalent between the two groups. Episiotomy, higher birth weight, higher mother age, perinatal death, delivery mode, onset of labor, and use of analgesics were all independent predictors of the mother being booked when adjusted for all outcomes and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rate of perinatal and maternal mortality in this cohort was relatively low and equivalent between booked and un-booked mothers, contrary to our expectations. More analysis of the socioeconomic data may explain this striking result.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective chart-review with incomplete data retrieval that affected the completeness of data retrieved. The results of the multivariate analysis cannot be used to infer causality because the study is observational.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Saudi medicine\",\"volume\":\"43 6\",\"pages\":\"357-363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11182430/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Saudi medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2023.357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2023.357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在沙特阿拉伯,围产期胎儿死亡率和孕产妇死亡率仍然相对较高。产前护理的目的是改善预后;然而,在沙特阿拉伯,缺乏证据证明产前护理对预后的影响:调查产前检查的预约情况是否会影响孕妇的预后,并确定可预测预约情况的预后:设计:回顾性观察队列研究:设置:三级医疗中心:纳入 2011 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间入住产房或分娩室的所有沙特籍孕妇。对已预约和未预约产妇的结果进行比较,并使用逻辑回归确定预测预约状态的结果,同时对年龄进行调整:样本量:10 781 名妇女;其中 9546 人(88.5%)已预约,1192 人(11.1%)未预约:结果:未预约产妇的胎粪染色液(P=.040)、子宫破裂(P=.017)和剖宫产失血量大于 1000 毫升(P=.003)的发生率较高,但外阴切开术的发生率较低(PConclusions:该队列中围产期和孕产妇死亡率相对较低,预约和未预约产妇的死亡率相当,这与我们的预期相反。对社会经济数据的更多分析可能会解释这一惊人的结果:回顾性图表审查,数据检索不完整,影响了数据检索的完整性。多变量分析的结果不能用来推断因果关系,因为该研究是观察性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mortality outcomes between pregnant women booked for antenatal care and unbooked pregnant women.

Background: Perinatal fetal mortality and maternal mortality remains relatively high in Saudi Arabia. Antenatal care aims to improve outcomes; however, evidence to demonstrate its impact on outcomes in Saudi Arabia is lacking.

Objectives: Investigate whether booking status for antenatal care impacted outcomes for pregnant women and identify outcomes that predicted booking status.

Design: Retrospective observational cohort study.

Settings: Tertiary care center.

Patients and methods: All Saudi women admitted to the labor or delivery units between January 2011 and December 2019 were included. Outcomes were compared between booked and unbooked women, and logistic regression was used to identify outcomes that predicted booking status, adjusted for age.

Main outcome measures: Booked/unbooked status and perinatal mortality of Saudi women.

Sample size: 10 781 women; 9546 (88.5%) booked, (11.1%) 1192 unbooked.

Results: Unbooked mothers had higher incidences of meconium-stained liquor (P=.040), ruptured uterus (P=.017), and blood loss >1000 mL during cesarean deliveries (P=.003), but a lower episiotomy rate (P<.001). Perinatal fetal mortality and maternal mortality were equivalent between the two groups. Episiotomy, higher birth weight, higher mother age, perinatal death, delivery mode, onset of labor, and use of analgesics were all independent predictors of the mother being booked when adjusted for all outcomes and age.

Conclusions: The rate of perinatal and maternal mortality in this cohort was relatively low and equivalent between booked and un-booked mothers, contrary to our expectations. More analysis of the socioeconomic data may explain this striking result.

Limitations: Retrospective chart-review with incomplete data retrieval that affected the completeness of data retrieved. The results of the multivariate analysis cannot be used to infer causality because the study is observational.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信